ojos, is quite frankly a pain in the arse to use. I use it, only
because I like to resurect projects every couple of months or so -
because I'm one of those philistines, who gets paid to write software.
The replies to this thread are so willfully obtuse, I started to wonder
about two weeks ago if I were being trolled. Now I am certain of that
fact.
Kindest, loving regards,
Bryan Hunt
a good idea to Version Control
the Apache Commons libraries alongside the Flex SDK source code?
Regards,
Bryan Hunt
y management with an eye towards the
larger eco-system was the most significant problem.
Ant is fine for small projects, I used to use it myself back in 2003 or
thereabouts but for larger stuff, with big teams it sucks.
Regards,
Bryan Hunt
does not a truth make.
If your story is/was true, I don't think the problem was between the
Software and the Build System, I think it was a Problem Between The
Chair And Keyboard.
There seems to be a bit of an anti-maven, pressure group - manifesting
itself in the lowlands at the moment.
Best.
'Bryan Hunt'
artifacts for). These are two totally
> different discussions.
>
> This thread can be used to discuss which build tool we should use to build
> to Flex SDK.
Maven, Ant or Make.
Regards,
Bryan Hunt
ing artifacts in Maven, why would you then
use a seperate build system to access them? What do you gain?
Have you used Ant and Maven before?
Regards,
Bryan Hunt
ly reproduce their build or you store
up many problems for the future.
Regards,
Bryan Hunt
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:21:50 +0100, Alain Ekambi
wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/alternative
> And what exactly wrong with targeting the Flash player ?
> Because it does work on Linux ? Well use Chrome. Which is the best browser
> anyway.
> I dont really see what s the problem folk.
>
> The fir
a kiss on the
cheek?
Regards,
Bryan Hunt
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:36:55 -0500, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 2/27/2012 8:02 AM, David Arno wrote:
> > As I'm sure most of you know, Adobe announced last Wednesday that they were
> > dumping their support for Flash on Linux.
> That is inaccurate. It'll be supported in Chrome; and if other
> br
heir Player roadmap as well... seems to be going far away
> from Apache Flex vision... Games? Video boards?
>
> Rafael Santos
> CEO at Specta
Yeah, Chrome doesn't ship with any 'Flashblock'. "Do no evil", my arse.
Bryan Hunt
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:16:57 -0500, Nicholas Kwiatkowski
wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/alternative
> Already done :)
>
> https://github.com/apache/flex
>
> -Nick
Man, Subversion sucks, how come you guys are using it in 2012 anyway?
Regards,
Bryan Hunt
eing is just
to be, regardless'. Perhaps he was on to something.
Regards,
Bryan Hunt
13 matches
Mail list logo
