On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:07:10 +0100, Yennick Trevels <yennick.trev...@gmail.com> wrote: Non-text part: multipart/alternative > I'm splitting up the previous thread because there was imo too much > confusion between which build tool to use for the Flex SDK and which build > tools we should support (aka create artifacts for). These are two totally > different discussions. > > This thread can be used to discuss which build tools we should support. > E.g. for Maven we should create Flex SDK artifacts that will be deployed on > a repository, for Ant we should maintain the ant scripts which people use > to build their project, etc.
You still seem to be confused. Why would one chose to support two build systems - when ANT, is to all intents and purposes a subset of Maven's functionality; minus dependency management and a standardized configuration? Especially if you are generating artifacts in Maven, why would you then use a seperate build system to access them? What do you gain? Have you used Ant and Maven before? Regards, Bryan Hunt
