Awesome!!
-Arthur
On Aug 9, 2012, at 3:05 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The Apache Flex PPMC would like to inform our community that Adobe Systems
> Inc. has assigned the Flex trademark to the Apache Software Foundation.
> This is an important milestone in our progress towards graduating and
> becom
+1 to Jude's description suggestion.
On Aug 5, 2012, at 4:17 AM, jude wrote:
> It's on our wiki as well [1]. I would change the last line to, "Flex
> applications can be deployed to the ubiquitous Adobe® Flash® Player in the
> browser, Adobe® AIR™ on desktop and mobile or to native Android, iOS,
I like Keith's suggestion. I think that, given the attitude surrounding Flash
in the developer community, dropping that name or minimizing it would be good
to do. It also would make it easier for non developer folk to understand what
it is that Flex really does. Just my two cents.
-A
Wow! I really like that.
--
Arthur Lockman | Senior Developer @ Vivace
vi.vace.me
Twitter: @arthurlockman
a.rthr.me
On Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> > just out of practical concerns - does it look good
> > scaled down and in grayscale?
> >
t as well. Just performance as a
whole needs to be worked on.
--
Arthur Lockman | Senior Developer @ Vivace
vi.vace.me
Twitter: @arthurlockman
a.rthr.me
On Wednesday, January 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Fréderic Cox wrote:
> And it's not only on mobile, on desktop (mostly Mac's) this is a probl
+1 on this. Performance definitely needs to be addressed on Flex. I've noticed
that on newer devices, it works fine. But on the slightly older ones,
performance is a huge issue. Hopefully we can get in there and clean it up so
it performs better.
--
Arthur Lockman | Senior Deve
Thats worth a lot. I'm glad to hear that.
-Arthur
---
Arthur Lockman
a.rthr.me
@arthurlockman
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 4, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> I can tell you that it is my commitment. Take that for what it is worth.
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:36 PM,
I hope that it stays air compatible. Working with flex mobile with air
is a breeze, and there's really nothing like it. I hope it continues
to work with it.
---
Arthur Lockman
a.rthr.me
@arthurlockman
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 4, 2012, at 4:30 PM, "Fréderic Cox" wrote:
>
I agree with Peter. There needs to be some kind of structure so we
don't en up with some kind of mishmash of features that dont work
together.
-Arthur
---
Arthur Lockman
a.rthr.me
@arthurlockman
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 4, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Peter Elst wrote:
> Thats a good point
