Justin,
Rat-check failed with two issues. I'm fixing that now and running rat again
(takes about an hour). I also fixed a minor issue in the README since we're
going to have to re-kit again.
I'll email again with the all clear when rat is clean and I check in
build.xml.
While waiting for rat I
Hi,
This is a Apache Flex 4.9.0 release candidate 6. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES
and the README.
Fixed in this release candidate:
- Fix so that the release build compiles the experimental projects (issue with
empty.properties being removed from binary package)
The release candidate can be fo
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> default value (if present). I figured out how to handle
> that in JS
>
Hi Erik,
just so that you do not run into a minor fallacy Bernd Paradies went into
in FalconJS: did you have a look at my blog post tackling exactly that
feature, defau
Mike,
I ended up in 'org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.js.codgen.ASBlockWalker',
the 'visitParameter' method, where I commented out all code but the
first two lines. That seemed to do the trick :-) Do you want me to
check in my commented "solution"? For kicks and just to get the
process running?
I just re-run the tests because it was so weird before and now I have all
previous tests failed [1] but with bad image, where is there something
logical in all that ?
- Fred
[1]
=
Failed:
===
Interesting I don't knwo but weird, to get the console log, I just re-run
the failed tests and the spark/core/fxg/properties passed and now I have a
bad image for the gumbo/components/Image/styles
I don't understand what happened, I ran them several times between yesterday
and today and they fai
Hi Folks,
I've seen the last few VOTE threads, immediately become discussions.
I have two thoughts.
(1) Start the process with a [DISCUSS] thread with a title like "[DISCUSS]
Packaging for Apache Flex 4.9 RC6 - is it ready for a VOTE"
Once consensus is reached then a VOTE can proceed rather qu
Interesting. Does the console output give the full path to where it wrote
the bad.png files? Are you sure you're in the right source branch
(release4.9 vs develop).
Anyway, I've seen those same failures so I think we just ignore them for
now.
On 12/22/12 8:18 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> T
There are no bad images in tests\spark\core\fxg\properties\baselines or
\tests\components\Charts\Bubble\Properties\Baselines that's why I can't get
how I can have Failed CompareBitmap
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 5:11 PM
To: flex-dev@i
Maybe I don't understand. If you use imageDiffAIR it can't find any bad
images? Are you looking in the right folders?
On 12/22/12 7:48 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
>> Player is choosing different pixel values.
> Use a grey background color in ImageDiffAIR
>
> As I said before,
Hi Alex,
Player is choosing different pixel values.
Use a grey background color in ImageDiffAIR
As I said before, the problem is I haven't got any bad image to compare them
with, I wonder how it can be possible to have Failed CompareBitmap without
bad images, you know why ?
- Fred
-M
Those will have to wait until we get the display list compare feature
checked in after the release. Player is choosing different pixel values.
Use a grey background color in ImageDiffAIR.
Justin can you start a vote thread on RC6?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 12/22/12 4:45 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
Hi,
Running Mustella Tests against FP11.4/AIR3.4/en_US, I've still got these
failed tests :
=
Failed:
=
components/Charts/Bubble/Properties/BubbleProperties
BubbleSeries_multipleAxes_dis
And one more thing,
We use to think of ourselves, programmers, a problem solvers.
We love that phrase so much, that we even creating more for ourself by
making wrong design decisions.
I realised that all my talks seems to many of you as to much care on the
initial state of the process.
Like wor
Hehe, is not your bit I am worry about,
And well, OK I will stop posting for a moment, because looks like
interrupting people at work.
Will back to discussion when will be able to help physically, for now
just talking during my breaks, because busy working on something that
pay my bills.
By
Frank,
I never said that. Everyone cares that's why we having this discussion
going. But different people different ideas how we should do care :)
And I do agree with Alex too, he was the one who started with very early
prototype and kick-started this thread.
I see Alex as a guy of lets-do-it
Erik,
I've got a challenge for you. Try to figure out how to change how a
parementer is emited and fix the;
- com.example.components.MyTextButton = function(value:String) {
line to;
- com.example.components.MyTextButton = function(value) {
If you can figure that out, it's all down hill.
M
This is funny, it took me less then 2 weeks to rewrite the cross
compiler for alternate output formats and we are talking about not
competeing.
A team is only as strong as it's weakest link. That link is not going
to be me. I have a feeling Daniel this will get ironed out. Once Erik,
Al
Oh you made me break my promise of radio silence! I guess that will
start tomorrow, my kids are throwing tomatoes at me then they get up
(I'm on EST). :)
Yes, The way I am testing this is have your debug workspace setup with
the variables view.
- Put your break point on visitor.visitFil
well, Christmas time, parents in law in house, perfect moment to have a
read trough then :)
Merry Christmas to everyone.
On 12/22/2012 12:09 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
Nice catch;
But as I said I wasn't done. :) What you see is that I am tired and
stopping for today. :) I just wanted to pos
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Daniel Wasilewski wrote:
> With all respect, all the talks on this subject just convinced me more to
> continue my work on BixBite project, because I can't see flex to compete in
> near future.
Dan, what exactly in this discussion made you think that we don't ca
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I saw a brief overview of Require and it seemed way more difficult than
> goog.require, but I could be wrong about that.
>
Hi Alex,
using RequireJS may (only) become difficult if you use its advanced
features (e.g. path mappings), but my prot
FYI, I was able to use the unit test to look at the JS output, by
uncommenting the assert and looking at it fail ;-)
Is there a more convenient way to do this? Mind you, I'm not
complaining! Just askin' ;-)
EdB
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Awesome, Mike!
>
> Now you
And oh, the swfobject issue I had in earlier RCs have gone away now. Not
sure what fixed that.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Om wrote:
> I tested with the installer and Flex 4.9 RC6 looks good to me. I switched
> up the sdk-installer-config.xml file to point to RC6 in case anyone else
> w
I tested with the installer and Flex 4.9 RC6 looks good to me. I switched
up the sdk-installer-config.xml file to point to RC6 in case anyone else
wants to test.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> We'll try to make RC6 work. I am downloading it now.
>
>
> On 12/21
Awesome, Mike!
Now you've gone and created a reason for me to waste a considerable
amount of the holidays on getting to know this code and "finish" the
conversion table ;-)
Have a very merry Xmas,
EdB
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Well I busted my A$$ b
26 matches
Mail list logo
