Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

On 12/10/12 9:24 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > >> The top-level build.xml has the basedir set to some folder on your computer. > The checked in file is correct, but the file build on machine isn't, this was > to get around spaces in paths and issues with the ant unzip task. I'll have to

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

Hi, > The top-level build.xml has the basedir set to some folder on your computer. The checked in file is correct, but the file build on machine isn't, this was to get around spaces in paths and issues with the ant unzip task. I'll have to come up with another way of fixing that. Thanks, Justin

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

HI, > The top-level build.xml has the basedir set to some folder on your computer. Opps that change shouldn't of been checked in. I'll correct that. Thanks, Justin

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

The top-level build.xml has the basedir set to some folder on your computer. I set it to "." and am building. On 12/10/12 8:57 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > BTW I did check the MD5 hashes, PGP signatures and the checkin tests passed - > which is a good start. > > I think the README in

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

Hi, BTW I did check the MD5 hashes, PGP signatures and the checkin tests passed - which is a good start. I think the README instructions may need updating. An "ant main" works but there's no notes of how to use the src distribution in any of the IDEs (Use scripts in ide/flashbuilder/?) via the

Re: CONFIG::performanceInstrumentation / PerfUtil?

I don't know what kinds of changes folks have planned for the current Flex SDK code, but other than the CSS perf fix, I haven't seen too many other things that would make getting this stuff through an audit a priority. The problem with any perf suite that runs on people's computers is the possibil

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

I have fixes for all failures that aren't related to ADG, Charts or ResourceManager. It required some changes to the SDK so a full mustella run needs to happen tonight to verify. On 12/10/12 10:02 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > I have found flaws in the StyleManager tests (also timing/event issues)

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

Hi, > Mind if I take a stab at fixing some awkward wording in the readme? Not at all - feel free to modify the version in the release branch. Thanks, Justin

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

Sorry -- misfire on the auto correct--- That was to say Carol, not Carroll. On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > I know Carroll has battled the issue with the README for a while. > > Mind if I take a stab at fixing some awkward wording in the readme? Some > of the ref

Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

I know Carroll has battled the issue with the README for a while. Mind if I take a stab at fixing some awkward wording in the readme? Some of the references to the previous versions are confusing how they are written today. -Nick On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: CONFIG::performanceInstrumentation / PerfUtil?

And I didn't say that was for Apache but more for committers, when someone tells you what he did breaks performences, I want to be able to demostrated too -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 3:46 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: CONFIG::performanceInstrumentation / PerfUtil?

PerfSubmitter probably talks to an Adobe thing and I'm pretty sure that's private too but I'd like to be able to develop the same class without doing a war with Adobe's legals, that's my point. -Message d'origine- From: Alex Harui Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 8:07 PM To: flex-dev@i

Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

Hi, This is a just a test release to see that it been packaged, signed and everything is where it should be and signed correctly. I'd appreciate if someone can take a look and give me some feedback. Note that this test release has not been tagged and the full Mustella tests have not been run.

Re: Falcon SDKSWCTests

Nice! That fixed other 5 tests for free and made other 2 easy to fix. I've committed the changes to the sdk and sdkswctests. We now have 18 out of 29 tests passing. I'll try to start looking over the hard ones over the week. Cheers, Chema 2012/12/10 Gordon Smith > > I've just commited some cha

RE: Falcon SDKSWCTests

> I've just commited some changes into rpc, authoringsupport, framework and > mobilecomponents so that they compile properly in falcon. I've enabled those > tests and now we have 11 out of 29 working. Nice progress! > Warning: mx.core.Version is defined by multiple files: This is an example wh

Re: Falcon SDKSWCTests

Hi, I've just commited some changes into rpc, authoringsupport, framework and mobilecomponents so that they compile properly in falcon. I've enabled those tests and now we have 11 out of 29 working. @Gordon One recurrent issue for other projects is Warning: mx.core.Version is defined by multiple

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33290) Apache Flex Mavenized SDK Deployer Bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13528339#comment-13528339 ] Jose Barragan commented on FLEX-33290: -- Hi Frédéric, I was testing yet: C:\Document

Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml

Oh, ok. That hasn't been changed. If I got that right, the release script is generating the build.number based on the current svn revision and then injecting it to the ant target with -Dbuild.number. The only change we added here was avoiding to include a file with that number in three of the gene

Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml

That’s done in the top-level build.xml, target is frameworks-rsls, and it uses build-number="${release.version}.${build.number}" which is the build.number I was referring to - passed in on the command line for the release build, defaults to 0 from build.properties. Carol On 12/10/12 4 :18PM, "Ale

Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml

I think Justin was worried about the RSL names when creating an RC. How do the RSLs get their names? Doesn't the TLF RSL have a different version appended to its name? Don't the other RSLs go from having a .0.0.0 to some actual version? On 12/10/12 1:07 PM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: > As far as

Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml

As far as I know the sdk build isn't using the build.number files (the installer has one which is being used). build.number is a "magic" file which the ant build number task uses. There is a build.number property in the top-level build.properties file which is overridden with the svn rev for rele

Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml

I did a full mustella run over the weekend (it takes my computer over 12 hours...). In an initial pass, I got about 70 errors or so with the swcs not including version.properties. Then I reverted the changes and run the mustella on the failures getting the same errors, the changes don't seem to int

RE: [Falcon] Unit tests failing

And I'm not blocked by this. - Gordon -Original Message- From: Gordon Smith Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 11:21 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [Falcon] Unit tests failing They're not yet run by 'ant tests'. I just run them in Eclipse. But I'm planning to add them t

RE: [Falcon] Unit tests failing

They're not yet run by 'ant tests'. I just run them in Eclipse. But I'm planning to add them to Ant soon. - Gordon -Original Message- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 10:56 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Falcon] Unit tests fa

Re: [Falcon] Unit tests failing

Excellent. I will go back to other things. On 12/10/12 11:13 AM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote: > I can take a look at it tonight if it's not too late then. > > Cyrill > > Am 10.12.2012 um 10:56 schrieb Alex Harui : > >> OK. Are the feature tests in the ant build? I think they aren't so they >> di

Re: [Falcon] Unit tests failing

I can take a look at it tonight if it's not too late then. Cyrill Am 10.12.2012 um 10:56 schrieb Alex Harui : > OK. Are the feature tests in the ant build? I think they aren't so they > didn't break so I didn't notice them. > > I've got to deal with some mustella issues, then I'll get to this

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

On 12/10/12 9:56 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: > > Quoting Alex Harui : > >> Mike, >> >> What are you planning to do with your Friday work? Assuming I get time to >> work on my MXMLClassDirectiveProcessor today or tomorrow, I think I want to >> teach it to spit out the goog code, but then

Re: CONFIG::performanceInstrumentation / PerfUtil?

On 12/10/12 10:00 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >> I think it was a plug-in that fed results to a reporting infrastructure. > I'm not so sure we need it but we could try to get it donated. > > I comeback on that because it would be nice to be able to test the perfs on > parts of the framework

Re: [Falcon] Unit tests failing

OK. Are the feature tests in the ant build? I think they aren't so they didn't break so I didn't notice them. I've got to deal with some mustella issues, then I'll get to this unless you are completely blocked. I think you aren't if you copy the sdk. On 12/10/12 10:27 AM, "Gordon Smith" wrot

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33290) Apache Flex Mavenized SDK Deployer Bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13528161#comment-13528161 ] Frédéric THOMAS commented on FLEX-33290: Hi Jose, I agree with the idea of ​​usin

RE: [Falcon] Unit tests failing

You only made the unit-tests work with a unittest.properties file. I think the feature-tests need a similar fix. I don't particularly want to have multiple .properties file that have to be configured. Can you please make one, perhaps at the level of the falcon directory, that can be used by both

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33290) Apache Flex Mavenized SDK Deployer Bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13528128#comment-13528128 ] Jose Barragan commented on FLEX-33290: -- Hi Frédéric, I still in conversation about

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33290) Apache Flex Mavenized SDK Deployer Bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13528119#comment-13528119 ] Frédéric THOMAS commented on FLEX-33290: Hi Jose, I'm not sure if you use it or c

[jira] [Updated] (FLEX-33290) Apache Flex Mavenized SDK Deployer Bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frédéric THOMAS updated FLEX-33290: --- Assignee: Frédéric THOMAS > Apache Flex Mavenized SDK Deployer Bug >

[jira] [Created] (FLEX-33290) Apache Flex Mavenized SDK Deployer Bug

Jose Barragan created FLEX-33290: Summary: Apache Flex Mavenized SDK Deployer Bug Key: FLEX-33290 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33290 Project: Apache Flex Issue Type: Bug

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

I have found flaws in the StyleManager tests (also timing/event issues). I will test those out shortly. On 12/10/12 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > OK, thanks. > > > On 12/10/12 3:22 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > >> @Alex >> I don't know what happened this morning but I had what I describe

CONFIG::performanceInstrumentation / PerfUtil?

I think it was a plug-in that fed results to a reporting infrastructure. I'm not so sure we need it but we could try to get it donated. I comeback on that because it would be nice to be able to test the perfs on parts of the framework but I noticed that not all the framework/tests directory ha

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

Quoting Alex Harui : Mike, What are you planning to do with your Friday work? Assuming I get time to work on my MXMLClassDirectiveProcessor today or tomorrow, I think I want to teach it to spit out the goog code, but then I need the AS output to also do the same. Maybe I'll just try make the

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

Mike, What are you planning to do with your Friday work? Assuming I get time to work on my MXMLClassDirectiveProcessor today or tomorrow, I think I want to teach it to spit out the goog code, but then I need the AS output to also do the same. Maybe I'll just try make the changes for the AS outpu

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

OK, thanks. On 12/10/12 3:22 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > @Alex > I don't know what happened this morning but I had what I described above in > my working copy, looking at the svn, it wasn't like that, well, anyway, this > one is fixed, the 2 others as well, it means the 3 last of my 90 faile

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

On 12/10/12 9 :06AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: > > >On 12/9/12 12 :25AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > >>I would ignore AdvancedDataGrid and Charts. The tests are newly donated >>and >>I'm not sure they have been proven to work on both platforms. > >The AdvancedDataGrid and Chart tests pass for me on b

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

@Carol, I mean, whitout to fix anything ? -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 3:48 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed Good news, cheers Carol :) -Message d'origine- From: Carol Frampton Sent: M

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

Good news, cheers Carol :) -Message d'origine- From: Carol Frampton Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 3:06 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed On 12/9/12 12 :25AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: I would ignore AdvancedDataGrid and Charts. The tests

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

On 12/9/12 12 :25AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I would ignore AdvancedDataGrid and Charts. The tests are newly donated >and >I'm not sure they have been proven to work on both platforms. The AdvancedDataGrid and Chart tests pass for me on both Windows and Mac using the develop branch and player 11

Re: [Flash Builder] Mystery email from Adobe Licensing

I appreciated the post. Thanks Sent from my Virgin Mobile Android-Powered Device - Reply message - From: "Kevo X Thomson" To: , Subject: [Flash Builder] Mystery email from Adobe Licensing Date: Sat, Dec 8, 2012 5:54 pm Still, those using Flash Builder 4.7 would have found that they re

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

Quoting Frank Wienberg : Mike, what about this approach: you continue on your path, and I go ahead and tweak Jangaroo to generate code using the "goog" API (where is makes sense, see my comment on the Wiki page) instead of the Jangaroo Runtime, so I can experiment with what the desired output f

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

Quoting Frank Wienberg : Okay, so for the time being, I'll continue to share my experience / ideas here on the mailing list and by commenting in the Wiki. In case you are not watching the Wiki page, I just struck again

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

Mike, what about this approach: you continue on your path, and I go ahead and tweak Jangaroo to generate code using the "goog" API (where is makes sense, see my comment on the Wiki page) instead of the Jangaroo Runtime, so I can experiment with what the desired output format would be without having

RE: Welcome Chema Balsas as Apache Flex Committer!

Congratulations. -Original Message- From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Om Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 18:08 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Welcome Chema Balsas as Apache Flex Committer! Team, Please join me in welcoming Chema Balsas as our

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

Okay, so for the time being, I'll continue to share my experience / ideas here on the mailing list and by commenting in the Wiki. In case you are not watching the Wiki page, I just struck again

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

@Alex I don't know what happened this morning but I had what I described above in my working copy, looking at the svn, it wasn't like that, well, anyway, this one is fixed, the 2 others as well, it means the 3 last of my 90 failed tests are fixed and committed [1]. The 2 last, were a bit tric

Re: Falcon compiler on java 7

oh my bad. just created FLEX-33289 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33289 thanks. Jun. 2012/12/10 Michael Schmalle : > Hi, > > Can you post this as a bug in JIRA [0] please? > > > Mike > > - [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX > > > > Quoting jun funakura : > >> Hi, >> >> Fa

[jira] [Created] (FLEX-33289) Falcon compiler does not support java 7 on Mac OS X.

Jun Funakura created FLEX-33289: --- Summary: Falcon compiler does not support java 7 on Mac OS X. Key: FLEX-33289 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33289 Project: Apache Flex Issue

Re: Falcon compiler on java 7

Hi, Can you post this as a bug in JIRA [0] please? Mike - [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX Quoting jun funakura : Hi, Falcon compiler does not support java 7 on Mac OS X. but flex sdk is already supported. Completion of FLEX-33110. Java 7 support on Mac and Windows. http://s

Falcon compiler on java 7

Hi, Falcon compiler does not support java 7 on Mac OS X. but flex sdk is already supported. Completion of FLEX-33110. Java 7 support on Mac and Windows. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1402596 Can someone fix the CommandLine as follows? +javaVersion="`java -version 2>&1 |

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

Quoting Alex Harui : On 12/9/12 11:28 PM, "Frank Wienberg" wrote: Mike, this is really great news! Wow! I'd really like to get my hands on that code of yours! I'd like to see it too. FWIW, I think I have successfully found a way to get FalconJS to call my MXMLClassDirectiveProcessor so

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

Quoting Frank Wienberg : Mike, this is really great news! Wow! I'd really like to get my hands on that code of yours! I made sure I didn't use any code from anywhere except my head on this first iteration. I also used some of my experience when I made an as3 code creator framework a cou

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33134) New Apache Flex website

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527778#comment-13527778 ] Erik de Bruin commented on FLEX-33134: -- Also, in my comment above (from Nov. 16th), I