I think Justin was worried about the RSL names when creating an RC. How do the RSLs get their names? Doesn't the TLF RSL have a different version appended to its name? Don't the other RSLs go from having a .0.0.0 to some actual version?
On 12/10/12 1:07 PM, "Carol Frampton" <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote: > As far as I know the sdk build isn't using the build.number files (the > installer has one which is being used). build.number is a "magic" file > which the ant build number task uses. > > There is a build.number property in the top-level build.properties file > which is overridden with the svn rev for release builds with > -Dbuild.number=<svn last changed rev> on the command line of the build. > > Carol > > On 12/10/12 3 :44PM, "Chema Balsas" <jbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I did a full mustella run over the weekend (it takes my computer over 12 >> hours...). In an initial pass, I got about 70 errors or so with the swcs >> not including version.properties. Then I reverted the changes and run the >> mustella on the failures getting the same errors, the changes don't seem >> to >> introduce any new errors. >> >> @Justin Since you were the one to raise concerns about this, does this >> look >> good to you? >> >> To wrap it up, in the other thread Gordon said: >> >> I think Adobe's build machines had some scripts that set build.number to >>> the Perforce revision number that it was building. >> >> >> I assumed this was being used to keep track of the released versions of >> some swcs. Can someone on Adobe confirm or further comment on this? What >> strikes me as odd is that only those 3 swcs were including this file. Is >> there some explanation for this, or is this maybe just some code left from >> the donation process? >> >> Cheers, >> Chema >> >> 2012/12/8 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >> >>> There was a discussion in another thread. Maybe I misunderstood. Anyway >>> develop branch was broken. Release branch doesn't have this problem. >>> >>> Sent from my Motorola ATRIX 4G on AT&T >>> >>> >>> -----Original message----- >>> From: Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >>> To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org> >>> Sent: Sat, Dec 8, 2012 17:33:55 GMT+00:00 >>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in >>> /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml >>> spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>>> Remove version.properties include-file directive from rpc, spark and >>> spark_dmv as conflicts with compile-config.xml and is currently unused >>> You might want to double check that it not used in the release build. I >>> think that the version number is used when generating the RSLs. >>> >>> Justin >>> > -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
