In theory, any new tests should pass, but it is very easy for them to pass
on your system and have them fail on other systems. New tests often need
some back and forth between systems and OS's to work out any kinks.
On 12/8/12 11:19 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Thank's Alex, I'll run the tes
Thank's Alex, I'll run the test in the day then.
BTW, that makes me wonder, is it a normal process here to commit tests that
not pass or it's an exception ?
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 8:11 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject:
I will investigate the test failures over the next few days. There are two
sets of failures that are troubling that we want to make sure isn't in 4.9.
The rest might be flaws in the tests themselves.
If you get the same failures with or without the patch, then it is ok to
accept the patch. I kno
Hi Alex,
What then for the failed tests not relative to AdvancedDataGrid and Charts
?
I've got no clue how to fix them and some are relative to CSS, except I
wanted to run the test suite against a patch which modify CSSCondition, does
it worth to test it anyway or I have to wait for someone
I would ignore AdvancedDataGrid and Charts. The tests are newly donated and
I'm not sure they have been proven to work on both platforms.
I ran the full suite last night and saw the same other errors.
On 12/8/12 8:54 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> After a closer look, they all failed comparin
After a closer look, they all failed comparing bitmaps except for the three
last where it's a locale resources problem.
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 5:36 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [Mustella] 90 tests failed
Hi,
Hi,
Can someone confirm he recently ran the all test suite with no failed tests ?
I just ran it and had 90 tests failed[1]
After a quick look at the advanceddatagrid ones, it appear that’s due to the
sort separator comparing bitmaps and the edges of the glyphs too.
- Fred
[1]
Managers/StyleMa
On 12/8/12 2:46 PM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
>
>
> On 12/8/2012 5:37 PM, Kevo X Thomson wrote:
>> As far as I know, you need Flash Builder 4.7 to work with Apache Flex.
>
> You are misinformed:
>
> If you want to develop applications with Apache Flex 4.8, you can use
> Flash Builder 4.6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527329#comment-13527329
]
Frédéric THOMAS commented on FLEX-33273:
I updated the SDK an ran the all test sui
Williams,
It seems this is an issue with Adobe AIR, not Flex. I don't think we have
the ability to fix this, as the code is not ours to fix. You may need to
open a ticket with Adobe, or ask the question in the Adobe AIR forums to
see if they can help you out more.
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at
Hi Kevo,
I don't see anything wrong with your posting as you clearly marked the
thread as having to do with Flash Builder. Jeffry's comments, as he stated,
were just a tad bit anal retentive as you aren't posting questions to Adobe
on Apache Flex's mailing list but instead simply sharing some info
Still, those using Flash Builder 4.7 would have found that they required a
new serial number to continue using it.
I thought I might share my findings with others who might have been
affected in the same way. I'm sorry if I ruffled your feathers or broke
etiquette by posting something off topic, b
On 12/8/2012 5:37 PM, Kevo X Thomson wrote:
As far as I know, you need Flash Builder 4.7 to work with Apache Flex.
You are misinformed:
If you want to develop applications with Apache Flex 4.8, you can use
Flash Builder 4.6 just fine. You can use IntelliJ. You can use command
line tool
As far as I know, you need Flash Builder 4.7 to work with Apache Flex.
I also demarked the title with [Flash Builder] to give a clue as to the
contents.
On 8 December 2012 20:06, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> Not to be anal retentive; but what does this have to do with Apache Flex?
>
>
> On 12/8/20
Not to be anal retentive; but what does this have to do with Apache Flex?
On 12/8/2012 4:25 AM, Kevo X Thomson wrote:
This morning I received an email from Adobe titled "Your Adobe licensing
order has been processed".
As I hadn't knowingly ordered anything, I investigated further. It appears
There was a discussion in another thread. Maybe I misunderstood. Anyway develop
branch was broken. Release branch doesn't have this problem.
Sent from my Motorola ATRIX™ 4G on AT&T
-Original message-
From: Justin Mclean
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org"
Sent: Sat, Dec 8, 2012 17:33
Cheers Carol,
I can compile the locales and run the test suite now :-)
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 11:28 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release build - another TLF issue
Thanks Carol
Much appreciated, I think we now in a
Oh, I see...
How do you think this could affect the release? Are you aware if there's
any check for build.number somewhere? Only rpc, spark and spark_dmv were
including this file inside their swcs in the whole sdk. The release process
will still use the build.number to update all the Version.as fi
Hi Om,
Ok, I see, the addition of a socket server is a good idea (I guess you had
to change something in the suite to make you server be listened, hadn't you
?).
I'm pretty much doing the same thing[1] on my side except that I started the
from the other side, as I already explained, the goal
Hi,
> Remove version.properties include-file directive from rpc, spark and
> spark_dmv as conflicts with compile-config.xml and is currently unused
You might want to double check that it not used in the release build. I think
that the version number is used when generating the RSLs.
Justin
No problem Greg!
I've just verified that I have access and have been able to do a simple
commit, so I'm ready to go :)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chema
2012/12/8 Greg Reddin
> Sorry for the delay again. I've now given jbalsas commit access to Flex.
>
> I know some of the other new committers had issues
Sorry for the delay again. I've now given jbalsas commit access to Flex.
I know some of the other new committers had issues with publishing the
site. I'm not sure if that ever got resolved. But you should have access to
the source repo now.
Greg
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Greg Reddin wro
I found a URL you can use to request an update from 4.5 or 4.6
https://adobeformscentral.com/?f=aqd5Yq*ONlcAvnasuWDB8w#
On 8 December 2012 16:12, Kevo X Thomson wrote:
> I have purchased all my Adobe software licenses from the Business Store:
> http://volumelicensing.adobe.com/
>
> And I end up
I have purchased all my Adobe software licenses from the Business Store:
http://volumelicensing.adobe.com/
And I end up retrieving my serial numbers from this URL
https://licensing.adobe.com/
Perhaps they have a different process for updating customers who purchased
via other methods.
Regards,
neither did I
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:52 AM, James Roland Cabresos
wrote:
> I had one 4.6 license but didn't received such email.
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Kevo X Thomson >wrote:
>
> > This morning I received an email from Adobe titled "Your Adobe licensing
> > order has been processe
I had one 4.6 license but didn't received such email.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Kevo X Thomson wrote:
> This morning I received an email from Adobe titled "Your Adobe licensing
> order has been processed".
>
> As I hadn't knowingly ordered anything, I investigated further. It appears
> that
26 matches
Mail list logo
