On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Om wrote:
>
> > Mentors,
> >
> > As you have seen in the vote thread, we need 2 IPMC votes for the RC7 to
> be
> > released. We have plenty of +1 votes and I think that this is good
> enough
> > for a release.
Shigeru Nakagaki created FLEX-33237:
---
Summary: UIComponent#resourceManager_changeHandler() should be
protected scope.
Key: FLEX-33237
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33237
Project: A
On 10/28/12 9:55 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> The SDK should not need to be built for particular player versions.
>
> Currently 4.8 requires 11.1 (specified as minimum player version in
> flex-config.xml) which means as far as I'm aware you can't compile an
> application using the c
Hi,
> The SDK should not need to be built for particular player versions.
Currently 4.8 requires 11.1 (specified as minimum player version in
flex-config.xml) which means as far as I'm aware you can't compile an
application using the current SDK and make it run in flash player 11.0 or
below. T
Thanks Alex. After I reset linkages to merged-into-code it worked and a
newly created and my own project runs without error.
So I tried to reproduce the error I had before but no success.
+1 It's working. great .. thanks for the work.
cyrill
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 10/28/12 8:42 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Just update from svn, rebuilt, ran mustella tests and got 104 fails, 55
> related to MarshallPlan (FP11.1)
You probably need to setup an http server. Tests expect to use localhost to
get at some sub-swfs for testing.
>
>> I still think that if
Just update from svn, rebuilt, ran mustella tests and got 104 fails, 55
related to MarshallPlan (FP11.1)
I still think that if you use -createImages you could create baselines
that
miss something when you make changes, if your configuration has some error.
If I run -createImages just after I
On 10/28/12 1:27 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Anyway, I don't want to change the actual things, my goal basicly was to be
> able to build and test the current framework against a particular
> playerglobal version and make sure the tests would pass if I modify the
> framework, I discovered 2
On 10/28/12 12:59 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a suggestion why not add the flash player version to the image path if
> they differ by a signifiant amount? That way we have multiple baselines, and
> any new changes would show up if they break one or more versions of the flash
> p
On 10/28/12 12:37 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> Maybe I'm not understanding your strategy. If someone tries to use your
> proposed build.properties and changes player versions, they will get
> failures against your 10.3 baselines, won't they?
>
> If someone check out the sdk and in order t
Even a brand new project?
Otherwise, check your project properties to make sure linkages are set to
merged-into-code. It looks like some things are set to external or RSL.
On 10/28/12 3:02 PM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote:
> Does anyone tried it successfully with flash builder 4.7 b1. After I
> downl
Does anyone tried it successfully with flash builder 4.7 b1. After I
downloaded apache flex 4.8.0 through the installer app I get on all my
projects and even newly created hundreds of actionscript runtime errors.
VerifyError: Error #1014: Class mx.core::UIComponent could not be found.
at flash.
Just found a better solution:
you can give cygwin a lower priority.
Write a new batch file, for exampe "cygstart.bat" with the following
content:
# cygstart.bat
start "Cygwin" /low C:\cygwin\Cygwin.bat
While I'm writing this email, my tests are running :)
-Message d'origine-
From: F
Hi there,
I've been taking my few first uncertain steps into grokking the Falcon
sources. I was looking at the MXMLStringNode tests and wanted to see if the
parser takes into account
CDATA sections in them.
So I added a test that set up an node like this:
String code = ""; //The CDATA section
he
As a hint, I set the process priority of my shell lower than normal and can
use windows almost normaly while the tests are running.
-Message d'origine-
From: Michael Schmalle
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:38 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: mustella performance
Hi,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-20864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13485601#comment-13485601
]
Ad Miel commented on FLEX-20864:
I use Flex 4.6.0.23201 and I get still this issue with
s
Anyway, I don't want to change the actual things, my goal basicly was to be
able to build and test the current framework against a particular
playerglobal version and make sure the tests would pass if I modify the
framework, I discovered 2 things, the first one was a mustella java bug, the
seco
It could be done but it's not necessary IMO, each other can modify and run
the tests for a particular playerglobal/swf-version, as soon as they want to
check in, they just have to make sure those changes pass in the current
official version of the framework.
-Message d'origine-
From:
For example, if my company has customers still in FP 10.3, my company will
need to have a apache flex sdk built from that particular version, if later,
my company find a bug into the framework, before to do any change, my
company will have to generate the baseline images, once done, they can
mo
Hi,
Just a suggestion why not add the flash player version to the image path if
they differ by a signifiant amount? That way we have multiple baselines, and
any new changes would show up if they break one or more versions of the flash
player.
Justin
Maybe I'm not understanding your strategy. If someone tries to use your
proposed build.properties and changes player versions, they will get
failures against your 10.3 baselines, won't they?
If someone check out the sdk and in order to build it for another particular
version, changes the build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Neogene updated FLEX-33232:
---
Description:
Setting loop as property of a videoplayer/videodisplay and playing creates a
not gapless playin
On 10/28/12 12:07 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> So changing swf.version and running with -createImages doesn't really tell
> you anything
>
Maybe I'm not understanding your strategy. If someone tries to use your
proposed build.properties and changes player versions, they will get
failures
So changing swf.version and running with -createImages doesn't really tell
you anything
All my assumption was based on what you told me before:
"The SWF version is probably the most
important thing. If you set it to a lower number, that probably puts the
font rendering on a different code path
24 matches
Mail list logo
