Anyway, I don't want to change the actual things, my goal basicly was to be
able to build and test the current framework against a particular
playerglobal version and make sure the tests would pass if I modify the
framework, I discovered 2 things, the first one was a mustella java bug, the
second is that in order to have a valid buid that can pass the tests, I need
to specify in more than the playerglobal version, the swf-version which not
appear today in the build.properties but can be used anyway, I'm just saying
that if it would appear, it would make the live of the folks easier because
they would be aware of its importance.
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 9:13 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Flex runtime
It could be done but it's not necessary IMO, each other can modify and run
the tests for a particular playerglobal/swf-version, as soon as they want to
check in, they just have to make sure those changes pass in the current
official version of the framework.
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:59 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About Flex runtime
Hi,
Just a suggestion why not add the flash player version to the image path if
they differ by a signifiant amount? That way we have multiple baselines, and
any new changes would show up if they break one or more versions of the
flash player.
Justin
