> I was about to open an INFRA ticket to request the new mirrors after the
> SVN restructure
> I'd still do that otherwise any patches we git from git are going to be
> more and more out of date as time goes on.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
Alrighty, I submitted a JIRA issue [1].
-omar
[1] https://is
>
> Just wanted to make sure I didn't miss it, don't want to piss off INFRA by
> submitting more than one, I only looked through issues tagged Git.
>
> I'll re-open the ticket now so we can get the mirrors updated.
>
> -omar
>
Submitted request for new mirrors to match after SVN restructure: [1]
Hi,
> Hmm... not sure how messy that can get yet if we keep SVN mirroring to Git
> and merging patches into Git and sending them to SVN via git-svn.
Well as far as I can work out the git mirrors will lag behind the SVN master
repo so sometimes you get a changes that don't quite match but you coul
Congratulations Erik!
Keep up the good work and thanks for your contributions.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Om wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Erik de Bruin as Apache Flex's newest committer
> and PPMC member. Erik has been a vocal participant on the mailing list and
> h
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > We do want to get those mirrors back up before we move forward right?
> I'd guess that would take less time/infra has less objections (if at all)
> to that than the read/write Git repo so ask for the mirrors first.
>
> In order to
Hi,
> I want to try using git-svn to get code from GitHub/Git back to SVN, but I
> think the Git mirrors need to be updated before I try to mess with that.
Working with patch files is probably simpler, but would be good to know if it's
possible.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> We do want to get those mirrors back up before we move forward right?
I'd guess that would take less time/infra has less objections (if at all) to
that than the read/write Git repo so ask for the mirrors first.
In order to have a read/write git repo we would have to disconnect it from
bei
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/20/12 11:05 PM, "Omar Gonzalez" wrote:
>
> > Forgot the link to [2].
> >
> > Also, looks like flex-site is already mirroring: [3]
> >
> > So we just need 1-5.
> >
> > Should I put in the JIRA issue or did someone else already do it
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Om wrote:
> I don't think we need [1].
>
> Thanks,
> Om
So it would be 2-5 that we need, yea?
2. git://git.apache.org/flex-falcon.git
3. git://git.apache.org/flex-sdk.git
4. git://git.apache.org/flex-tlf.git
5. git://git.apache.org/flex-utilities.git
-omar
On 8/20/12 11:05 PM, "Omar Gonzalez" wrote:
> Forgot the link to [2].
>
> Also, looks like flex-site is already mirroring: [3]
>
> So we just need 1-5.
>
> Should I put in the JIRA issue or did someone else already do it?
>
I do not remember any emails from anyone claiming to have filed th
I don't think we need [1].
Thanks,
Om
On Aug 20, 2012 11:05 PM, "Omar Gonzalez" wrote:
> Forgot the link to [2].
>
> Also, looks like flex-site is already mirroring: [3]
>
> So we just need 1-5.
>
> Should I put in the JIRA issue or did someone else already do it?
>
> -omar
>
> [2] https://issue
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > * create patch file from pull request
> > 1) Commit & Push
> > 2) Create Pull Request
> > 3) Save Patch File & Correct Encoding
> >
> > * create patch file with git format-patch
> > 1) Commit & Push
> > 2) Create Patch File (gi
Forgot the link to [2].
Also, looks like flex-site is already mirroring: [3]
So we just need 1-5.
Should I put in the JIRA issue or did someone else already do it?
-omar
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4366
[3] https://github.com/apache/flex-site
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:03
Hey everyone,
It looks like the Git mirrors still haven't been updated so the changes to
the SVN structure are mirrored.
I looked through the Git tickets in Infra here: [1]
I didn't see any issues submitted to update our mirrors to match the new
structure.
>From what I can tell, what we need ar
Hi,
> * create patch file from pull request
> 1) Commit & Push
> 2) Create Pull Request
> 3) Save Patch File & Correct Encoding
>
> * create patch file with git format-patch
> 1) Commit & Push
> 2) Create Patch File (git format-patch)
Not 100% we have an encoding issue it may be what was che
Hi
Instead of using the patch file from a pull request it would be also
possible to create the patch file in the local repository with "git
format-patch .." ( http://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch )
I used this command to create my few patches. It could be even more
efficient than using the pul
Hi,
And I'm still not sure why "native2ascii -encoding UTF-8 -reverse" fixed the
patch but you then get an issue in applying it.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
>> It was in another translation es_ES file inside this project, but I can not
>> remember exactly what was that file. Making some file search would help.
All the other es_ES file are correctly encoded as far a sI can see.
So do we know if this is an issue with the encoding of the github pa
>It was in another translation es_ES file inside this project, but I can not
>remember exactly what was that file. Making some file search would help.
Justin,
Perhaps I misunderstood. It seems like this code was manually entered from this
response. Is that the case?
Mike
It was in another translation es_ES file inside this project, but I can not
remember exactly what was that file. Making some file search would help.
Right now I must turn off laptop. Please let me know what's the expected
format and I'll update the patch accordingly
Thanks on advance!
El martes,
>but I made it look like the first one since I saw other spanish translation
>transforming the special chars like that.
Where did you do that work?
Mike
>Yep look like the patch file is not UTF8 encoded?
Yeh, its not actually encoded at all. If it were, I would expect to see:
utf32 - 0x00F3
utf16 - 0x00F3
utf8 - 0xC3 0xB3
So, is it coming out of github's character patch generation code that way
directly? If so, we could write a bit of code
Hi Mike and Justin,
The line showed by mike as the example:
+invalidCharPostcodeError=El c\u00f3digo postal contiene caract\u00e9res
inv\u00e1lidos.
could be changed to this:
+invalidCharPostcodeError=El código postal contiene caractéres inválidos.
but I made it look like the first one since I
Hi,
> Can you help me _see_ the Unicode issue better. I am clearly missing
> something. In the example patch, I see things like:
> +invalidCharPostcodeError=El c\u00f3digo postal contiene caract\u00e9res
> inv\u00e1lidos.
>
> Is this what you are referring to?
Yep look like the patch file is n
Hi,
> Also given that Justin is the only person on this list who has a full
> handle on the automated builds, we need to make sure that he is available
> during the switch.
There a few other people with access to Jenkins admin not just me. You do need
to have admin right in order to view the conf
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jeff Conrad wrote:
> > I thought when we made the "develop" branch in SVN it didn't show up in
> the
> > GitHub mirror.
>
> The GitHub mirror has been off since the svn restructuring. We
> essentially took one SVN repository with a branches, tags, and trunk
> and
>Anyone have any ideas on this? Using curl and the patch URL for a pull request
>from github to apply a githib patch to SVN looks possible if we can sort out
>the unicode issue.
Justin,
Can you help me _see_ the Unicode issue better. I am clearly missing something.
In the example patch, I see
Awesome! I knew it would have been an easy fix either way. Glad to
see you're on top of it.
>>> 2. The Jenkins automated build is broken right now
> It's actually working fine. I changed the job to use the new SVN URL shortly
> after it was changed.
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Flex_SDK_buil
Hi,
Anyone have any ideas on this? Using curl and the patch URL for a pull request
from github to apply a githib patch to SVN looks possible if we can sort out
the unicode issue.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
>> 1. What happens to the automated builds when we do the switch?
> That part is simple. The Git plugin is already installed in Jenkins.
Yep see no issues there and easy to modify the job to use Git rather than SVN.
>> 2. The Jenkins automated build is broken right now
It's actually workin
Hi Dave,
I just read, signed, scanned, and sent my iCLA to secret...@apache.org.
Jeff
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I appreciate your efforts. It may be necessary to have an apache id and be a
> committer.
>
> Have you filed an iCLA[1]? If not then that wou
Hi,
> Another proposal the get GBM on board using github.
Being an Apache project I'm fairly sure we need to host our source code with
Apache. That's not to say we can't use Github but I don't think it can be the
central repository.
Justin
BTW my github account (if anyone is interested) is her
Hi,
> AFAIK There will still be a delay until someone writes a good
> post-receive-hook script that runs on the
> git-wip-us.apache.org/incubating-flex-* repository to update GitHub as
> soon a changes are received.
Which is probably why it would be a bad idea to use the SVN/Git combined repo
br
Hi Jeff,
I appreciate your efforts. It may be necessary to have an apache id and be a
committer.
Have you filed an iCLA[1]? If not then that would help.
PPMC / Committer volunteers?
Regards,
Dave
[1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/
On Aug 20, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Jeff Conrad wrote:
> Hi Dave,
Hi Dave,
I'm in the IRC channel as jconrad. I'm not a committer or PPMC
member, but I'll do whatever I'm able / allowed to do to move this
along.
Jeff
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So many threads and so much volume of email that I don't have time to read.
>
> S
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Another proposal the get GBM on board using github. This proposal is due to
> the fact that official apache git repo is unusable due to no one (even PPMC
> members) to write on it:
I just saw your answer in the previous thread, but I'll put
great move! I wasn't aware of this! :)
2012/8/20 Jeff Conrad
> > I thought when we made the "develop" branch in SVN it didn't show up in
> the
> > GitHub mirror.
>
> The GitHub mirror has been off since the svn restructuring. We
> essentially took one SVN repository with a branches, tags, and t
> I thought when we made the "develop" branch in SVN it didn't show up in the
> GitHub mirror.
The GitHub mirror has been off since the svn restructuring. We
essentially took one SVN repository with a branches, tags, and trunk
and turned it into 6+. I totally agreed with that move, and I'm glad
On 8/20/12 12:56 PM, "Om" wrote:
>>>
>>> No. Any branching would be updated in the next github mirror refresh.
>> Has this been verified? It isn't true for SVN branching.
>>
> Why do you say that it is not true for SVN branching?
>
> Om
I thought when we made the "develop" branch in SVN
Thanks Jeff,
you put on the table lots of things. Right now I was syncing with github
fork and nothings comes! so it's clear that in this way we can't work. We
need urgently to get git and github refresh each time someone update SVN...
2012/8/20 Jeff Conrad
> > Thanks Jeff for doing all the l
Right! We are looking for people with completly freedom since this would
make make things move forward in the project due to remove barriers and
allow contributions flow.
The fear that at sometime apache flex official project will be cloacked by
a more successful fork will always be possible. Righ
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote:>
> > 1. Make a patch of ApacheFlexContributorA codebase and attach it to a
> JIRA
> > ticket. In the JIRA ticket the CLA of only Contributor A is sufficient.
> Has Apache ruled that this is the case?
>
That is what I got from the various JIR
On 8/20/12 12:21 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
> The one cool thing about GitHub lets me easily host my personal project on
> a publicly available repository. Take this scenario for example:
>
> Contributor A has an idea for a feature. He forks ApacheFlex on Github
> into ApacheFlexContributorA
> He
This seems like a great way to manage changes to Flex while giving people
complete freedom to fiddle with it. The danger can come, at some point in
the future, from git repositories that contain features not compatible
with Apache Flex. I would think this could be handled by making sure
Apache Flex
Hi,
So many threads and so much volume of email that I don't have time to read.
Someone from the PPMC who has volunteered to admin GIT for Flex should get on
IRC #asfinfra, introduce themselves, and start asking questions. Only then will
real answers come.
Best Regards,
Dave
You understand perfectly Peter :)
2012/8/20 Peter Ent
> If I mayŠ
>
> 1. Have Apache Git be the origin for Apache Flex (including branches that
> are official).
> 2. Use GitHub to mirror and for additional work and features. This lets
> the community do as the please to explore and modify, test,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/20/12 11:34 AM, "Om" wrote:
>
> >>
> >> What would be the steps to integrate a proposed change if we didn't use
> >> GitHub and we retired the GitHub mirror?
> >>
> >
> > I am sorry, but why would we want to retire the GitHub mirro
Github has a feature called pull requests that an Apache Flex Git repo does not.
https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests
It's essentially a code review process layer on top of git.
It allows us to fork Apache Flex… make modifications then send a pull request
to the main apache repo
Complete agree with you Peter, this way was I said... :)
Sent from my iPad
On 20/08/2012, at 20:58, Peter Ent wrote:
> If I mayŠ
>
> 1. Have Apache Git be the origin for Apache Flex (including branches that
> are official).
> 2. Use GitHub to mirror and for additional work and features. This le
If I mayŠ
1. Have Apache Git be the origin for Apache Flex (including branches that
are official).
2. Use GitHub to mirror and for additional work and features. This lets
the community do as the please to explore and modify, test, enhance, etc.
3. Committers perform the integration from GitHub to
On 8/20/12 11:34 AM, "Om" wrote:
>>
>> What would be the steps to integrate a proposed change if we didn't use
>> GitHub and we retired the GitHub mirror?
>>
>
> I am sorry, but why would we want to retire the GitHub mirror? Right now,
> it is read-only. If we leave it like that, the comm
Hi Om,
while googling how others make and focus on things with github - apache and
so on...I see this post :
http://www.mikealrogers.com/posts/apache-considered-harmful.html
worth a read by anyone here at least to be informed of internal things at
apache that many of us, new to the internals doe
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Om wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/20/12 11:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Alex,
>> >
>> > when we get the official repo in Apache we'd not need to have github,
>> but
>> > if you use it or not it wou
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/20/12 11:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > when we get the official repo in Apache we'd not need to have github, but
> > if you use it or not it would not be important. Git is "distributed" so
> > unlike SVN yo
On 8/20/12 1 :08PM, "Joel Marks" wrote:
>Great news!! Currently it seemed like Jin Huang was still working on TLF
>is Adobe going to continue to contribute any resources to TLF on Apache?
>
>There was talk still of a new version of TLF that was being worked on that
>included tables among other
See the "Merging a Pull Request" section near the bottom of this page:
https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests
The difference would be that you'd be pushing back to apache.org and the user
who opened the pull request would need to close it themselves.
--Dasa
On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:
FYI, a few of the major projects at Apache are using Git as their main
VCS: Cassandra, CouchDB, and TrafficServer.
http://cassandra.apache.org/ - Huge NoSQL database in use by Reddit,
Twitter, Digg, Netflix, and others. Originally open-sourced by
Facebook.
http://couchdb.apache.org/ - Another wel
On 8/20/12 11:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> when we get the official repo in Apache we'd not need to have github, but
> if you use it or not it would not be important. Git is "distributed" so
> unlike SVN you always have a "distributed" full repo. The one at apache
> will be th
Hi Om,
I was making pull request and moving the github thing due to the fact that
until we don't have apache git write access is the easiest way to get GBM
routed vía github and the integrated to SVN. What do you think about it?
If you think is not the way we could go try another
Best,
Carlos
Hi Michael,
as Jose Barragan told us in a response in this thread it seems we don't
need such branch. I must said that we, at work, didn't need such branch.
I think the first problem to solve here is to get write access to the
github apache flex repo. You as PPMC could see why apache flex repo do
> Almost all of them are procedural questions. We need to be aware of what
> would happen after the switch so that we are prepared. Other Apache projects
> have successfully move the Git, so it is only a matter of us figuring things
> out ourselves. I am
> raising these questions now so that
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> when we get the official repo in Apache we'd not need to have github, but
> if you use it or not it would not be important. Git is "distributed" so
> unlike SVN you always have a "distributed" fu
> 1. What happens to the automated builds when we do the switch? I think we
> are using an svn connector in Jenkins right now. We need to switch to the
> git plugin for the switch.
That part is simple. The Git plugin is already installed in Jenkins.
Here's a build using Git that happened 50 mi
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Guthmann, Scott <
sguthm...@on3solutions.com> wrote:
> > I can do it. Can we first discuss what the immediate repercussions
> would be when the switch happens? Here are my concerns:
> > 1. What happens to the automated builds when we do the switch? I think
> w
> I can do it. Can we first discuss what the immediate repercussions would be
> when the switch happens? Here are my concerns:
> 1. What happens to the automated builds when we do the switch? I think we
> are using an svn connector in Jenkins right now. We need to switch to the
> git plugin
Hi Alex,
when we get the official repo in Apache we'd not need to have github, but
if you use it or not it would not be important. Git is "distributed" so
unlike SVN you always have a "distributed" full repo. The one at apache
will be the so called "origin" and well all flows will converge, but th
I can do it. Can we first discuss what the immediate repercussions would
be when the switch happens? Here are my concerns:
1. What happens to the automated builds when we do the switch? I think we
are using an svn connector in Jenkins right now. We need to switch to the
git plugin for the swi
> Thanks Jeff for doing all the legwork. I think it would be better if PPMC
> members create the Infra request.
Can a PPMC member make that ticket today and then post in this thread
what the ticket number is I can follow it? I did a quick search of
all the Infra tickets and I didn't see one abou
I don't think I ever updated the naming conventions to reflect that decision,
but I should have.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:25 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mixed Case class names and SW, SW
>The issue is how do we change github pull requests into SVN commits and
>hopefully with a minimum amount of steps/minimal extra work required. If
>anyone has any ideas please speak up.
Justin,
What if we maintained a git branch which had the .svn files checked in already.
The process would t
>That would be much appreciated. As someone who is just 1/3 of the way thru
>the git-hub book I am completely lost by this discussion. At this point, only
>if there were very clear instructions with relatively few >steps would I be
>interested in committing a patch for someone.
Once we get a
On 8/20/12 10:08 AM, "Joel Marks" wrote:
> Great news!! Currently it seemed like Jin Huang was still working on TLF
> is Adobe going to continue to contribute any resources to TLF on Apache?
>
> There was talk still of a new version of TLF that was being worked on that
> included tables amon
Great news!! Currently it seemed like Jin Huang was still working on TLF
is Adobe going to continue to contribute any resources to TLF on Apache?
There was talk still of a new version of TLF that was being worked on that
included tables among other things. Will that code be contributed and if
so
On 8/20/12 9:51 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> Hi Carol,
>
> my recomendation is that you make a user in github, then make a fork of
> apache flex mirror in your user, and finaly start playing with all the
> things git and github can give you, so you end understanding the sharing
> and communit
Hi Carol,
my recomendation is that you make a user in github, then make a fork of
apache flex mirror in your user, and finaly start playing with all the
things git and github can give you, so you end understanding the sharing
and community driven philosophy behind all this stuff.
Thanks
2012/8/
Maybe git-svn would work?
http://www.google.com/search?q=git+svn+workflow
On Aug 20, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> The issue is how do we change github pull requests into SVN commits and
> hopefully with a minimum amount of steps/minimal extra work required. If
> anyone has any ide
On 8/20/12 11 :56AM, "Omar Gonzalez" wrote:
>>
>> I understand the answer is not in the book but first I have to learn
>>what
>> pull and push requests are.
>>
>> Carol
>>
>>
>Just to add some clarity to these two terms, sorry if you already know.
>
>First, there is no such thing as a push requ
>
> I understand the answer is not in the book but first I have to learn what
> pull and push requests are.
>
> Carol
>
>
Just to add some clarity to these two terms, sorry if you already know.
First, there is no such thing as a push request, there are only pull
requests.
A pull request is not th
On 8/20/12 11 :29AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> That would be much appreciated. As someone who is just 1/3 of the way
>> thru the git-hub book I am completely lost by this discussion.
>
>My guess is that the answer is not in the github book (just as the
>gitflow docs are for Git not SVN)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > That would be much appreciated. As someone who is just 1/3 of the way
> > thru the git-hub book I am completely lost by this discussion.
>
> My guess is that the answer is not in the github book (just as the gitflow
> docs are for
Hi,
> That would be much appreciated. As someone who is just 1/3 of the way
> thru the git-hub book I am completely lost by this discussion.
My guess is that the answer is not in the github book (just as the gitflow docs
are for Git not SVN) but that's what got voted for so that's what we need
On 8/18/12 8 :11AM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote:
>Hi
>
>Started to test the LangPacks/German and after a while I found out that
>this path is added to the exclude propertey (sdk.mustella.excludes). in
>mustella/properties/musstella1.properties. Is there a specific reason that
>all the language tests e
On 8/17/12 11 :30PM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net"
wrote:
>>Maybe Michael Labriola or Om could support us here...
>
>Let me catch up on the thread and try to help out tomorrow.
That would be much appreciated. As someone who is just 1/3 of the way
thru the git-hub book I am completely lost by
I have updated the Mustella wiki with a section on repairing the tests.
This should help you identify the failure and pinpoint where to make the
change to the test case. Be sure to re-run after each change as Mustella
stops on the first failure and subsequent test steps may have erroneous
expected
Hi Flex PPMC members,
I have added links to
http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html and
http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt to the invitation
that we send to new committers and PPMC members, see
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/New+committer+or+PMC+member+i
85 matches
Mail list logo
