On 7/14/12 8:28 PM, "FRANKLIN GARZON" wrote:
>
> Thanks for the information Alex. If ADOBE can help us to migrate HTML5 using
> whatever other ADOBE tool will be great (I meaning near to migrate with
> minimal redo code), so our effort in the way not will be lost at 100%.
>
I have to remind
Thanks for the information Alex. If ADOBE can help us to migrate HTML5 using
whatever other ADOBE tool will be great (I meaning near to migrate with minimal
redo code), so our effort in the way not will be lost at 100%.
Franklin Garzón
Regional Development Manager
MCITP Microsoft SQLServer
Your time and effort are greatly appreciated Gordon.
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/13/12 7:32 PM, "FRANKLIN GARZON" wrote:
>
>>
>> Congratulations, this is a good news.
>> Any people know about the compiler for our enterprice apps into HTML5?
>>
> That is sched
On Jul 14, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 7/14/2012 11:41 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> Anyway this is an example about why it is best to try to contribute upstream
>> and use the unaltered project code if possible.
> I have to admit I am not sure if this sentence is directed at me, at
>> The paragraph is attempting to say "any version of 1.5 greater than 0_13 or
>> 1.6". 1.7 is not supported.
>
> Understood [now]. Should we make that more overt and explicitly state
> that 1.7 is not supported? Or am I the only one who is going to make
> that mistake?
Feel free to chang
You are not the only one so far. There have been a few people on the
mailing list that have mentioned they had 1.7.
-Nick
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 7/14/2012 11:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 7/14/12 8:55 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
>>
>> The project sh
On 7/14/2012 11:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
On 7/14/12 8:55 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
The project should note somewhere on the DL page that there are build issues
with Java 7 and what those are, but it is not a release blocker - IMO.
I might recommend adding this to the readme file. I'm s
On 7/14/2012 12:32 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
Jeffry,
Where are you seeing that it simply says 1.5.0_13 or higher is
required? The README clearly says 1.5 or 1.6. We will want to make
sure that gets corrected for others.
The only place I see version numbers mentioned in the readme is
The 1.5 or higher caught me too. I had 1.7 and then just tried 1.5 just in
case, and it then worked. I meant to mention this but forgot.
I read 1.5 or higher as to include 1.7
Sorry if the readme has already changed
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Jeffry,
Where are you seeing that it simply says 1.5.0_13 or higher is required?
The README clearly says 1.5 or 1.6. We will want to make sure that gets
corrected for others.
Cygwin is a toolset that allows you to use certain unix/linux tools, such
as bash, on Windows. It does come with a pack
On 7/14/12 8:55 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
>
>> The project should note somewhere on the DL page that there are build issues
>> with Java 7 and what those are, but it is not a release blocker - IMO.
> I might recommend adding this to the readme file. I'm still under the
> belief that my in
On 7/14/2012 11:41 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Anyway this is an example about why it is best to try to contribute upstream
and use the unaltered project code if possible.
I have to admit I am not sure if this sentence is directed at me, at
Flex, or at Batik.
The project should note somewhere on
There is a patch in Jira that I submitted to build the SDK with Java 7. If
you have some spare minutes, it would be good to know if the patch works
for you.
Regards,
Christophe
Op 14 jul. 2012 17:42 schreef "Dave Fisher" het
volgende:
>
> On Jul 14, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> > O
On Jul 14, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 7/14/2012 11:28 AM, Clint Modien wrote:
>> need to build with jdk ver 1.6
>
> I'll try that; but if that is the case I misunderstood the release notes:
>
>Java SDK 1.5 (0_13 or greater)
>or Java SDK 1.6 (*1)
>
> I assumed that 1.7
On 7/14/2012 11:28 AM, Clint Modien wrote:
need to build with jdk ver 1.6
I'll try that; but if that is the case I misunderstood the release notes:
Java SDK 1.5 (0_13 or greater)
or Java SDK 1.6 (*1)
I assumed that 1.7 was greater than 1.5 and therefore it should work.
Was that an
need to build with jdk ver 1.6
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 14, 2012, at 7:59 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> I'm still unable to build the Apache Flex SDK; and I'm guessing it is a
> configuration issue on my own machine; but I'm at a loss on what to look at
> next.
>
> I downloaded the RC3. (
I'm still unable to build the Apache Flex SDK; and I'm guessing it is
a configuration issue on my own machine; but I'm at a loss on what to
look at next.
I downloaded the RC3. ( The zip file from here:
http://people.apache.org/~cframpton/ApacheFlexRC/release_candidate_3/ ).
I'm using W
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-26916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tony Stevenson updated FLEX-26916:
--
Attachment: (was: Screen Shot 2012-07-12 at 21.39.52.png)
> [TLF 2820847] Bindable valu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-26916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tony Stevenson updated FLEX-26916:
--
Attachment: Screen Shot 2012-07-12 at 21.39.52.png
> [TLF 2820847] Bindable values not upda
19 matches
Mail list logo
