1) +1
2) -1
Navin
1) +1
2) -1
-Saurabh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oleg Sivokon updated FLEX-35:
-
Attachment: build.patch
The patch for downloads.xml
> Removing dependency to a contrib libr
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35 I posted the patch. It seem
to work for me.
Best.
Oleg
Removing dependency to a contrib library in the MXML download/build script
--
Key: FLEX-35
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35
Project: Apache Flex
Issue
1) +1
2) -1
(Binding)
SDK upgrades in Flex have always been difficult enough. Package renaming is
a pretty trivial benefit given the cost.
sD
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> It's no biggie, just wanted to make sure we didn't miss a binding vote if
> you were on PPMC sinc
While we are at it, what is the convention for property names in Ant
scripts? I can find these: CAPS_LOCK_IS_HERE, names.with.dots and
sTuRdYcApS, which one should I use if I need to add a new property?
Best.
Oleg
>
>
> Oleg, if you want to see something like this get done, it is best to do it
> yourself and submit the patch.
>
> I absolutely will. Was just asking whether this was intended.
On 4/1/12 3:32 AM, "olegsivo...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Hi Justin, I understand what it's used for. I am asking that because I
> think that simplicity of compilation for others > simplicity of writing for
> the author.
> Besides, I know a lot of people who would, out of principle disallow ant
> co
It's no biggie, just wanted to make sure we didn't miss a binding vote if
you were on PPMC since I didn't recognize the email.
-omar
On Sunday, April 1, 2012, tinylion development wrote:
> Sorry mate
>
> I just used someone else's message and copy pasted
> as it was same as what I wanted to say
Sorry mate
I just used someone else's message and copy pasted
as it was same as what I wanted to say
Lazy I know. Will keep an eye that in future
-Original Message-
From: omarg.develo...@gmail.com
[mailto:omarg.develo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Omar Gonzalez
Sent: 01 April 2012 01:15
To:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Martin Heidegger
wrote:
> I found that the discussion about the "org.apache.flex" package was not
> finished and there is still the ISSUE Flex-7[1] open.
>
> So I suggest that we start voting on that, please vote on following points:
>
> 1) Keep the current pack
Hi Justin, I understand what it's used for. I am asking that because I
think that simplicity of compilation for others > simplicity of writing for
the author.
Besides, I know a lot of people who would, out of principle disallow ant
contrib libraries. And I quite share their viewpoint. Compilation s
Hi,
> Was this conrib library inherited or added on purpose? I'd rather we loose
> it. It's not required really.
It's needed for the if ant task which is used in the download ant script. While
it possible to write conditional ant tasks without it it makes them much
simpler and easier to underst
14 matches
Mail list logo
