1) +1 2) -1 (Binding)
SDK upgrades in Flex have always been difficult enough. Package renaming is a pretty trivial benefit given the cost. sD On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Omar Gonzalez <omarg.develo...@gmail.com>wrote: > It's no biggie, just wanted to make sure we didn't miss a binding vote if > you were on PPMC since I didn't recognize the email. > > -omar > > On Sunday, April 1, 2012, tinylion development wrote: > > > Sorry mate > > > > I just used someone else's message and copy pasted > > as it was same as what I wanted to say > > > > Lazy I know. Will keep an eye that in future > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: omarg.develo...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > > [mailto:omarg.develo...@gmail.com <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of > > Omar Gonzalez > > Sent: 01 April 2012 01:15 > > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org <javascript:;>; > > i...@tinylion.co.uk <javascript:;> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package > > "org.apache.flex" > > > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:08 PM, tinylion > > development > > <i...@tinylion.co.uk <javascript:;>>wrote: > > > > > 1) Keep the current package names in the first > > Apache Flex release > > > 4.8 > > > +1[Binding] > > > [[gw]] > > > > > > > > > 2) Change the package names in the first major > > Apache release 5 > > > 0 > > > [[gw]] > > > > > > > Are you on the PPMC? I don't recognize your email > > as one of the PPMC on the team list here: > > http://incubator.apache.org/flex/team.html > > > > If not please don't use [Binding] for your votes > > as it makes it more effort for the vote tally > > later, binding is for PPMC members. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Omar Gonzalez > > s9tpep...@apache.org <javascript:;> > > Apache Flex PPMC Member > > > > >
