Re: compiler files in pending svn load are in my whiteboard area

Was this conrib library inherited or added on purpose? I'd rather we loose it. It's not required really. Best. Oleg

RE: compiler files in pending svn load are in my whiteboard area

>Just a note to anyone trying to compiling that the download.xml script uses >the ant task which is not part of the standard ant install. >You'll need to get it form here: >http://sourceforge.net/projects/ant-contrib/files/ant-contrib/ant-contrib-1.0b2/ Also on windows, it is best to run these

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

> > > 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 > +1 {Binding} > > 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 > +0 {Binding} -- Omar Gonzalez s9tpep...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:08 PM, tinylion development wrote: > 1) Keep the current package names in the first > Apache Flex release 4.8 > +1[Binding] > [[gw]] > > > 2) Change the package names in the first major > Apache release 5 > 0 > [[gw]] > Are you on the PPMC? I don't recognize your email

RE: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 +1[Binding] [[gw]] 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 0 [[gw]]

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > Just for the record -- Flash Builder Licenses are not tied to a particular > platform like the creative suites. The 1+1 license can be split between > two different OSs (this is how I have mine setup -- Win for Desktop, Mac > for Lapt

Re: compiler files in pending svn load are in my whiteboard area

Hi, Just a note to anyone trying to compiling that the download.xml script uses the ant task which is not part of the standard ant install. You'll need to get it form here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ant-contrib/files/ant-contrib/ant-contrib-1.0b2/ On OSX you need to download the file and

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

I spoke at length to Adobe sales and they were very clear that I could not with one license of at least Flash Builder 4.6 standard (approx $250.00 ) be able to effectively install and run them both on my Win 7 tablet and on my Mac Mini and of course I don't mean simultaneous use. That was the rea

compiler files in pending svn load are in my whiteboard area

Although Alex got the signed software grant from Adobe to Apache on Friday it was not recorded so infra can not load the dump file this weekend. I just added the files that are in the dumpfile to my whiteboard area: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/whiteboard/cframpton/trunk I s

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

Hi, > 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 +1 [Binding] > 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 -1 [Binding] When voting down something I believe a reason must be given. In this case the package name change would affect a large amount

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

Honestly I'm not even sure I would want to vote for using "org.apache.flex" as a package name. While thinking about it I like the fact that Adobe stuck with spark.* and mx.*. We've talked about namespaces before and I voted to not use the "apache" ns there too. Would prefer a more descriptive name

RE: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

Reading the article below, seems I can vote, though it may not count and is not [Bindable] Sorry if I read it wrong and should be just watching. 1) +1 2) -1 Mark Fuqua -Original Message- From: Martin Heidegger [mailto:m...@leichtgewicht.at] Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 1:06 AM To: fl

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

Just for the record -- Flash Builder Licenses are not tied to a particular platform like the creative suites. The 1+1 license can be split between two different OSs (this is how I have mine setup -- Win for Desktop, Mac for Laptop). -Nick On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote: >

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

On Mar 31, 2012 9:24 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: > > Issue 1 : +1 > Issue 2 : -1 > > (Binding Votes) > 1) +1 2) -1 Binding.

RE: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

1) +1 [Binding] 2) 0 [Binding] -Original Message- From: Martin Heidegger [mailto:m...@leichtgewicht.at] Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 1:06 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex" I found that the discussion about the "org.apache.flex" packa

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

1) +1 2) +1 2012/3/31 David Francis Buhler > 1) +1 > 2) +1 > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 CODEOSCOPIC S.A. Avd. del General Perón, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

1) +1 2) +1

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

thanks, I guess when I did not see how a file template for a Flex unit test I assumed lack of support. Anyhow, I am now getting off subject , unfortunately nobody has commented on their thoughts as a substitute for the UI designer. for those interested i.e. here's a link to a blog showng FlexUnit

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release +1 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 -1 I would start using org.apache.flex when new stuff is added. A full renaming of the current package naming will break backwards compatibility with existing 3rd

donation of ui designer to apache flex? (was: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee)

Is there any news about the idea to give the flash builder ui designer to apache flex, as its a flex app? Le 31/03/2012 19:35, Charles Monteiro a écrit : they don't allow cross - os use. I feared that many would not think it pertinent to this list. My only glimmer of hope was that since Adobe

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

they don't allow cross - os use. I feared that many would not think it pertinent to this list. My only glimmer of hope was that since Adobe is dropping the UI designer that the Balsamiq + Napkee combo would give Apache Flex future users i.e. especially newbies like me hope i.e. that there's an alt

Apache Flex Versioning... again (#leSigh) (was Re: [DISCUSS][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex")

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote: > You are right, it was not decided (one step at a time): that's why I > marked it as "first release" and "first major release". > > yours > Martin. > > > > On 31/03/2012 21:03, Jeffry Houser wrote: > >> On 3/31/2012 1:06 AM, Martin Heidegge

RE: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

>#2 >I have not found a testing framework for AS3 that has a visual test runner >available i.e. like what's there in Flash Builder but maybe I have just missed >it ? FlexUnit integrates with FlashBuilder, FDT and IntelliJ to provide a visual test run and has 2 or 3 browser based visual test run

RE: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

> 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release +1 [Binding] > 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 -1 (maybe a 0 once we know what this means more)

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

really ? ok, I don't see FlexUnit as a framework available to the project. I'll inquire in the IDEA forums , thanks. I sent an email to Charles about that , the language on his site seems to state the opposite. Hopefully, it looks like a well thought out tool. On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Omar

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

On 3/31/2012 1:09 PM, Charles Monteiro wrote: hi, I just made a decision NOT to purchase the Flash Builder IDE, for one their license is tied to the computer and not to the user and I need to be able to both work on Flex on my Win notebook and Mac Mini. The Adobe licenses allow you to install it

Re: the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

You should be able to run Charles on both your computers. As far as a visual test runner you can use FlexUnit with IntelliJ's test runner. -omar

the gui designer issue: Balsamiq + Napkee

hi, I just made a decision NOT to purchase the Flash Builder IDE, for one their license is tied to the computer and not to the user and I need to be able to both work on Flex on my Win notebook and Mac Mini. Anyhow, in giving up Flash Builder I have given up on the following elements that are cruci

Re: [DISCUSS][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

You are right, it was not decided (one step at a time): that's why I marked it as "first release" and "first major release". yours Martin. On 31/03/2012 21:03, Jeffry Houser wrote: On 3/31/2012 1:06 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote: 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex rele

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

Apache policy: If it didn't happen on the mailing list, then it didn't happen. yours Martin. On 31/03/2012 20:30, தமிழ் wrote: Hi all, Here are my votes, 1) +1 2) +1 Can we host a polling somewhere instead of mail chains? Thanks, Tamil Elamukil

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

Issue 1 : +1 Issue 2 : -1 (Binding Votes) Keep existing package names as is until they are deprecated (change for change-sake makes a LOT of extra work, and only increases the stock in Tylenol) , but any new packages should reside in a new package. Carol: Lazy consensious have on record fro

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

On 3/31/12 1 :06AM, "Martin Heidegger" wrote: >I found that the discussion about the "org.apache.flex" package was not >finished and there is still the ISSUE Flex-7[1] open. > >So I suggest that we start voting on that, please vote on following >points: > > 1) Keep the current package names in

Re: [DISCUSS][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

On 3/31/12 8 :03AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote: >On 3/31/2012 1:06 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote: >> >> 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 >> 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 > > In terms of version numbers; I didn't think anything

Re: [DISCUSS][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

On 3/31/2012 1:06 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote: 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 In terms of version numbers; I didn't think anything was decided. I understood there was a chance Adobe coul

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

On 3/31/2012 1:06 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote: So I suggest that we start voting on that, please vote on following points: 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 +1 [Binding] 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 -1 [Binding] --

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

Hi all, Here are my votes, 1) +1 2) +1 Can we host a polling somewhere instead of mail chains? Thanks, Tamil Elamukil

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex" [BINDING]

> > 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 > > +1 > > > 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 > > + 0 > > >

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

[Binding] >  1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 +1 >  2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 -1 Cheers, Iwo Banas

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

Oops just realized that current package names do not contain any reference to Adobe, so I want to correct my vote: 1) +1 2) -1 Haykel On 31 March 2012 10:08, Haykel BEN JEMIA wrote: > 1) +1 > 2) +1. I suggest also to add a script or ant target to port old code. > > Haykel > > > > > On 31 Mar

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

1) +1 2) +1. I suggest also to add a script or ant target to port old code. Haykel On 31 March 2012 06:06, Martin Heidegger wrote: > I found that the discussion about the "org.apache.flex" package was not > finished and there is still the ISSUE Flex-7[1] open. > > So I suggest that we start

Re: [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex" [BINDING]

> 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 +1 > 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 + 0