> How about the designer, good enough to win our contest, determine how they
> want to take feedback. No design by committee.
+1, with passion :-)
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
I Agree..
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> Yea, that's more along the lines of what I meant. I don't think it needs
> major tweaks myself but I think the designer of the logo is best suited to
> tell us right?
>
Yea, that's more along the lines of what I meant. I don't think it needs
major tweaks myself but I think the designer of the logo is best suited to
tell us right?
On Jan 27, 2012 12:28 AM, "Omar Gonzalez" wrote:
>
> I don't think there is any need for another contest. I think we'll have to
> discuss how to proceed with having tweaks to refine the winning logo.
>
> -omar
How about the designer, good enough to win our contest, determine how they
want to take
I don't think there is any need for another contest. I think we'll have to
discuss how to proceed with having tweaks to refine the winning logo.
-omar
OMG... please, not another contest...
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:26 PM, James Ong wrote:
> I'm thinking if there a need for a contest whoever can tweak #42 logo
> with better design?
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Jonathan Campos
> wrote:
> > I would remove any fallen f discussion and just
I'm thinking if there a need for a contest whoever can tweak #42 logo
with better design?
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> I would remove any fallen f discussion and just be positive about good
> proposals. Wouldn't want to be picking at anyone.
> On Jan 26, 2012 11:54 PM
I would remove any fallen f discussion and just be positive about good
proposals. Wouldn't want to be picking at anyone.
On Jan 26, 2012 11:54 PM, "Doug Arthur" wrote:
> Here's my blog post proposal, I will post it tomorrow if no one opposes.
> -Doug
>
> ---
> Logo Contest Update:
Here's my blog post proposal, I will post it tomorrow if no one opposes.
-Doug
---
Logo Contest Update:
The logo contest was a major milestone for our project. The community
and PPMC members came together and voted on a logo, and were in-sync
for the entire ride. The community and
On Jan 26, 2012 9:39 PM, "Ted Patrick" wrote:
>
> Hello Apache Flex. My name is Ted Patrick, I run developer relations
> at Sencha and formerly worked at Adobe on Flex as an evangelist and
> have used Flash since it was FutureSplash and Flex since 1.5.
>
> I thought I might clarify some things...
Hello Apache Flex. My name is Ted Patrick, I run developer relations
at Sencha and formerly worked at Adobe on Flex as an evangelist and
have used Flash since it was FutureSplash and Flex since 1.5.
I thought I might clarify some things...
We launched a marketing campaign to talk to Flex develope
And another for the front page. We'll update the logo space (tweaking
allowed) when we get the ICLA and sources from Tomasz Maciag.
Thanks everyone!
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:30 PM
Subject: svn commit: r803382 - in /websites/production/flex: ./
Updated logo contest page with results, let me know if anything should
be changed.
- Doug
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:19 PM
Subject: svn commit: r803379 - in /websites/production/flex: ./
content/flex/logo-contest.html
To: flex-comm...@incubator.ap
Hello everyone,
Sorry for the delay, my schedule has not given me the time to post
this until now.
The Logo contest has come to a conclusion, and we have a winner.
Congratulations to Tomasz Maciag (#42) for his submission, as his logo
will become the new image of Apache Flex. As stated before, we
I've been doing a lot of work with Michigan State University's Research
Center for Persons with Disabilities (RCPD for short). Their
recommendation for the blind up until two years ago was JAWS with IE. They
always said it was the best supported, and worked with the most websites.
I guess Firefox
Please + for 42.
Franklin Garzón
Regional Development Manager
MCITP Microsoft SQLServer
*Si el hombre dejara de aprender entonces dejaría de existir*
094496862
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:21:04 +0100
> From: tomis...@svemir.net
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VO
Listening to the screen reader's robotic voice reading the same content
over and over for 100s of hours while testing accessibilitynow,
that...is a nightmare.
On Jan 26, 2012 8:25 PM, "Rick Winscot" wrote:
> What would be great for 508 is to implement first class mechanisms for
> accessibilit
What would be great for 508 is to implement first class mechanisms for
accessibility ... creating new components that are accessible (the Flash
way) is a nightmare.
On Jan 26, 2012 5:53 PM, "Michael Jordan" wrote:
>
> On 1/26/12 1:54 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >
On 1/26/12 1:54 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Francis Buhler [mailto:davidbuh...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:48 AM
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Pushing Flex components thorough the GPU
>>
>> Windows, Jaws, jaws
On 26.1.2012. 20:37, Alex Harui wrote:
Building a capability into a single framework where you can grab
bitmaps from the display list, hide the display list, use the GPU to
render a really slick animation, and bring the modified display list
right back on top of the final results might be a bet
+1 #42
Some comments:
#49
While really respecting the energy invested in working on this logo, it
just keeps reminding me on fallen F no matter how strong I try thinking
about raising mountain or Indian tent...
I tried to make it standing still by applying various transforms in in
Photoshop, b
Given Adobe's new emphasis on gaming, improving compile-time and JIT-time
optimization to increase ActionScript performance is becoming a high priority
for the company. Hopefully, ongoing compile-time optimizations will get
donated as improvements to Falcon.
- Gordon Smith, Adobe
-Origina
The Falcon compiler will have some bytecode optimizations that the current
compiler doesn't do, such as constant propogation. But in general, the question
of which optimizations belong in the compiler and which belong in the JIT is
tricky. If you put them all in the compiler, the SWF size could
If the need for GPU assistance is during scrolling and transitions, that's
a different problem. Building a capability into a single framework where
you can grab bitmaps from the display list, hide the display list, use the
GPU to render a really slick animation, and bring the modified display list
I have now seen it.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Francis Buhler [mailto:davidbuh...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:11 AM
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Pushing Flex components thorough th
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Altomare [mailto:lost...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:24 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Pushing Flex components thorough the GPU
>
> It seems that this thread has turned into a discussion about
> accessibility,
>
+1 count me in
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Om wrote:
> If anyone is interested in helping me take on this project please let me
>
> > know! As of right now I'm not sure how much time I can really dedicate to
> > this so all help would be greatly appreciated!
> >
> >
> Sign me up. I am not
If anyone is interested in helping me take on this project please let me
> know! As of right now I'm not sure how much time I can really dedicate to
> this so all help would be greatly appreciated!
>
>
Sign me up. I am not a committer though :-)
Om
> -Original Message-
> From: David Francis Buhler [mailto:davidbuh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Pushing Flex components thorough the GPU
>
> The only information I can find, regarding platforms for Flex and
>
It seems that this thread has turned into a discussion about accessibility,
while this is not a bad thing and is an interesting subject I think we may
have veered a bit off topic.
Is anyone here interested in discussing the implementation of this type of
GPU framework? As soon as I have some free
I'm happy to work on any Accessibility ANE tasks, btw.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Francis Buhler [mailto:davidbuh...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:48 AM
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Pu
The only information I can find, regarding platforms for Flex and
Accessibility always routes me to:
http://www.adobe.com/accessibility/products/flex/jaws.html
List of Accessible Flex components (this is probably out of date)
http://www.adobe.com/accessibility/products/flex/components.html
Impair
Don't discount HTML/JS frameworks without investigating them, or you'll
find yourselves contributing to a waning project while the competitors
are
recruiting all your developers.
Also, one or more of these frameworks might become our best friend
if we end up mapping MXML to their UI Widgets so
> -Original Message-
> From: David Francis Buhler [mailto:davidbuh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:48 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Pushing Flex components thorough the GPU
>
> Windows, Jaws, jaws scripts, and IE. :)
> On Jan 26, 2012 1:29 PM, "A
Windows, Jaws, jaws scripts, and IE. :)
On Jan 26, 2012 1:29 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Francis Buhler [mailto:davidbuh...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:27 AM
> > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Pushing Flex comp
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Also, one or more of these frameworks might become our best friend if we end
> up mapping MXML to their UI Widgets someday.
+1 Good point!
Hi Joan,
I've read the proverb at the end of your message. I totally agree with it.
Regards,
Bogdan
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Joan Llenas Masó <
joan.llenas.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sencha has done a great job making ExtJS a successful product and I'm sure
> they'll give some interesting
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug McCune [mailto:d...@dougmccune.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:24 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Webinar: Moving from Adobe Flex to HTML5 and Sencha
>
>
> Don't discount HTML/JS frameworks without investigating them, or y
> -Original Message-
> From: David Francis Buhler [mailto:davidbuh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:27 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Pushing Flex components thorough the GPU
>
> Do the Mobile Components support accessibility properties?
>
> The D
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:39 AM, David Francis Buhler wrote:
> Almost all accessibility implementations are failures. If a blind
> person cannot understand a single word pronounced, this can be a
> show-stopper.
>
> However, most US companies need to support users with disabilities. A
> disabilit
+1 #42
--
*Alberto Morales | @bertiko_**
*
Almost all accessibility implementations are failures. If a blind
person cannot understand a single word pronounced, this can be a
show-stopper.
However, most US companies need to support users with disabilities. A
disability can be cognitive, visual, a hearing problem, etc. The lack
of an accessi
Do the Mobile Components support accessibility properties?
The DateSpinner, for example, supports accessibility properties.
Whether or not the Accessibility properties of AIR on Mobile devices
works across all Mobile OS devices is a question I don't know the
answer to.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:
I agree also.
I think this will see it's biggest benefits in Mobile where accessibility
(may) not be as big of an issue. I'm not sure how accessible the current
Flex Mobile components already are or how they interact with accessible
handhelds.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Jonathan Campos wrot
>
> I understand the frustration but can we move on and concentrate on Flex?
I think an understanding of the others options out there is really good. I
saw the title of this thread and before clicking it was hoping it didn't
turn into one giant flamewar, which of course, it did. I think it is wor
I think there are two different use cases here
I think there is a common use case where you have a flexible ui that needs
to save the positions of hdividedbox and vdividedbox positions and the
column widths of datagrids, stuff like that, so that users can customize a
flexible view to their tastes
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Doug McCune wrote:
> Also, I'm still not clear on where AIR for mobile stands in regards
> to accessibility (ie with Apple's VoiceOver stuff or Android's TalkBack).
> Are current AIR for mobile apps accessible to screen readers?
>
I agree Doug. I don't see this
>
> So for now using Stage3D is not viable option IMHO as an enterprise
> application framework like flex cannot do without an accessibility
> implementation.
> So it's probably better to seek optimizations for flex using the
> displaylist api.
Unless some developers don't care about accessibilit
+1 #49 {binding}
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:55 AM, jude wrote:
> +1 #42
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Yiotis Katsambas wrote:
>
>> +1 #49
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:11 PM, David Francis Buhler <
>> davidbuh...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > +1 #42
>> >
>>
On 24-01-2012, at 09:48, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/23/12 7:36 PM, "Frank Altomare" wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Has anyone looked into the feasibility of pushing some of the Flex
>> components through a GPU framework such as Starling? Once Stage3D comes out
>> for mobile this would
I understand the frustration but can we move on and concentrate on Flex?
G.
> -Original Message-
> From: Roland Zwaga [mailto:rol...@stackandheap.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:33 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [OT] Atlassian
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> So I'm trying to understand
> where
> this disconnect between Adobe and its enterprise
One item from the PDF:
Developer immediacy Here’s how Ext JS provides more immediacy to the
developer than Flex:
• Greater flexibility, since Flex requires investment in Adobe-specific tool
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Andras Csizmadia wrote:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1375050/Sencha-Ext-JS
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/23/12 3:00 AM, "Martin Heidegger" wrote:
>
> > I think the tension here is justified. Many people waited for a long
> > time to work on things and the expectations are high. Right now a lot
> > of requests and questions that the p
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1375050/Sencha-Ext-JS-Flex-Comp.pdf.pdf
saved from your google docs link
-Original Message-
From: Joan Llenas Masó
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 5:12 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Webinar: Moving from Adobe Flex to HTML5 and Sencha
I made
I made it public to the whole web, it has to be accessible now...
if not I'll send it by email.
Anyway, I'll delete it as soon as the new one is made public. Rectification
is smart.
--
Joan Llenas Masó
http://joan.garnet.io
@joangarnet (es)
@joanllenas (en)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 17:01, Davi
Well, the fact that this document was ever created and made public makes me
think that Sencha was planning to play dirty. They were caught though.
Was Ted the one who wrote (or allowed to make public) the document?
I'd like to think that answer is no.
--
Joan Llenas Masó
http://joan.garnet.io
@jo
Still inaccessible.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Joan Llenas Masó
wrote:
> David, check again please.
>
> --
> Joan Llenas Masó
> http://joan.garnet.io
> @joangarnet (es)
> @joanllenas (en)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 16:56, David Francis Buhler
> wrote:
>
>> Joan,
>>
>> I cannot access
David, check again please.
--
Joan Llenas Masó
http://joan.garnet.io
@joangarnet (es)
@joanllenas (en)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 16:56, David Francis Buhler
wrote:
> Joan,
>
> I cannot access your link to the Google Doc. Perhaps the document
> isn't 'public'?
>
> -BUHLER
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012
Joan,
I cannot access your link to the Google Doc. Perhaps the document
isn't 'public'?
-BUHLER
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Joan Llenas Masó
wrote:
> wow, "some inaccuracies" was actually a sarcasm...
> Well then, my document checker popped up a notification saying "no criteria
> was foun
From: "Doug Arthur"
I think someone here should create an identical PDF, but about Flex -
with the facts, and post it here! I would totally do it if I had time,
but it would take me a week or more with my schedule.
- Doug
Before the guns starts blazing, it should be mentionned that Ted Patrick
+1 #42
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Yiotis Katsambas wrote:
> +1 #49
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:11 PM, David Francis Buhler <
> davidbuh...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > +1 #42
> >
>
Its showing up fine for me.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Fritze [mailto:marcus.fri...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:22 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Webinar: Moving from Adobe Flex to HTML5 and Sencha
404...
Am 26.01.2012 um 16:05 schrieb Dav
I get a "404 not found" for that link... Could someone please forward me a
copy of the PDF if they have it?
Thanks,
Andrew Trice
Technical Evangelist, Adobe
On 1/26/12 10:40 AM, "Doug Arthur" wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Arnoud Bos
>wrote:
>> no prop here. i can download the
wow, "some inaccuracies" was actually a sarcasm...
Well then, my document checker popped up a notification saying "no criteria
was found in this document".
Anyway, this doesn't change the fact that ExtJS is an excellent product.
I'm attending to the webminar just to see how they are going to appro
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Arnoud Bos wrote:
> no prop here. i can download the pdf (which is indeed very inaccurate)
> leaving out air is crazy. They say for example you cannot deploy flex on iOS.
>
> pff so many things wrong i don't know where to start
>
> another example: They only me
no prop here. i can download the pdf (which is indeed very inaccurate)
leaving out air is crazy. They say for example you cannot deploy flex on iOS.
pff so many things wrong i don't know where to start
another example: They only mention flash builder (premium edition) a $699 when
talking abo
404...
Am 26.01.2012 um 16:05 schrieb David Francis Buhler:
> http://pages.sencha.com/rs/sencha/images/Sencha-Ext-JS-Flex-Comp.pdf
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Ivan Ilijašić wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Jeffry Houser >> wrote:
>>
>>> They had another PDF up there which
Hi Omar, its easy to filter out the [OT] messages. The fact that you reply
to this thread seems like beating a dead horse as well ;)
On 26 January 2012 15:20, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> Honestly, at this point who cares where things went wrong? They went wrong,
> Flex is now at Apache and we are all
http://pages.sencha.com/rs/sencha/images/Sencha-Ext-JS-Flex-Comp.pdf
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Ivan Ilijašić wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Jeffry Houser >wrote:
>
> > They had another PDF up there which compared Sencha to Flex. It was
> > removed after I complained on twitte
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> They had another PDF up there which compared Sencha to Flex. It was
> removed after I complained on twitter about inaccuracies.
>
That's why I can't find it :)
They tried to compare Sencha and mobile Flex based on Flash Player, not on
AIR.
On 1/26/2012 6:38 AM, Joan Llenas Masó wrote:
Once you register to the webminar they offer the "The Development Manager’s
Quick Guide to HTML5" for download:
http://pages.sencha.com/rs/sencha/images/Sencha-WP-Dev-Mgrs-Guide-to-HTML5.pdf
Which seems to be a good overview of what they are going to
Honestly, at this point who cares where things went wrong? They went wrong,
Flex is now at Apache and we are all here. Don't mean to be so rude but
lets stop beating a long dead horse and move on people, Adobe has.
-omar
If you want a GUI for git svn commands the Tower app has support. Also, git
svn commands should come with a standard Git installation, at least I
didn't have to install that separately.
-omar
>I would rather see Stage3D render for mobile components and fallback
>to software render on unsupported devices.
I agree with that totally, I actually started a tread related to this
earlier this week.
My plan is to start experimenting with a GPU enabled DataGroup and go from
there.
On Thu, Jan
Francis,
> From: "Frank Altomare"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 26 de Janeiro de 2012 14:08>
> >
> > I, on the other hand, would 100% disagree and say that mobile features
are
> > very important.
> >
> >
> +1,
> I would actually say a focus on Mobile performance will really help out
the
> project
> Fr
I would rather see Stage3D render for mobile components and fallback
to software render on unsupported devices.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Frank Altomare wrote:
>>
>> I, on the other hand, would 100% disagree and say that mobile features are
>> very important.
>>
>>
> +1,
> I would actual
>
> I, on the other hand, would 100% disagree and say that mobile features are
> very important.
>
>
+1,
I would actually say a focus on Mobile performance will really help out the
project
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ivan Ilijašić wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jonathan Campos >w
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
>
> I, on the other hand, would 100% disagree and say that mobile features are
> very important.
>
>
+1
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Pepe wrote:
> # As my opinion, mobile feature is not important in Apache Flex.
I, on the other hand, would 100% disagree and say that mobile features are
very important.
--
Jonathan Campos
Can we have Flex at GitHub too?
--Dwayne
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> ...at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4366 - once that's
> setup, the mirror(s) will be listed at git.apache.org (see links to
> docs there).
>
> -Bertrand
>
Sorry, I didn't mean to be funny.
Sencha is one of the most stablished HTML RIA frameworks in the enterprise
market.
To give you an example, Adobe Day ECM is using it internally and is what
you use to extend Day's built in widgets.
They know what they do and I'm sure we can use their reasoning "aga
In that case you are talking about AIR, though, which is a different beast
from the Flash Player in terms of sandbox limitations. Within the browser
player you have limitations on how much data you can store in a shared
object before it prompts the user ( if I recall correctly it is 100kb) to
ask i
> From: Pepe [mailto:pepe.f...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 26 January 2012 07:45
>
> Please do not try to make a hybrid architecture. I believe it will
failure.
> I hope Flex 5 will have two versions which are desktop version and mobile
version.
The key here is to use composition, rather than inheritance,
Does it work well with the flash builder?
Em 19/01/2012 05:23, "Conrad Winchester" escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I am not sure if this helps, but I did a LOT of work with flex mojos last
> year and learnt to produce my own Maven installs of any SDK that I wanted -
> I outlined how to do it here
>
> htt
Great contribution LOLL
you are a funny guy :D
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joan Llenas Masó <
joan.llenas.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sencha has done a great job making ExtJS a successful product and I'm sure
> they'll give some interesting implicit inputs about where Flex can improve
> from
> From: Rui Silva [mailto:f...@rduartes.net]
> Sent: 26 January 2012 10:13
>
> For me, and for the time-being, Apache Flex is a good enough codename.
> After the first official release I'd give it another thought if that is
something I miss.
The problem I had with that is that we have three vers
Sencha has done a great job making ExtJS a successful product and I'm sure
they'll give some interesting implicit inputs about where Flex can improve
from their perspective.
I see this as a great opportunity to understand how they justify the
transition to potential enterprise customers.
They have
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Rui Silva wrote:
>
>
> For me, and for the time-being, Apache Flex is a good enough codename.
> After the first official release I'd give it another thought if that is
> something I miss.
>
> Rui
>
>
I totally agree.
> From: "David Arno"
> Someone suggested calling the first Apache release "lifeboat." I like
that,
> so it's what I have started referring to it as (it avoids the whole
> discussion on version numbers.) I don't know if anyone else uses the
term
> though.
>
> David.
For me, and for the time-be
> From: Rodrigo Pandini [mailto:rodrigopand...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 26 January 2012 02:51
>
> I would like know if there are some plan to put a codename for the new
version that will be release?
Someone suggested calling the first Apache release "lifeboat." I like that,
so it's what I have started
I agree with this, Flex 3 and Flex 4 should be kept apart and in my view
both moving to Apache and starting a fresh is as good as time as any to
trim away the fat as it's something I believe will be harder once you
release a build that people actually start using then you are stuck
maintaining that
On 26 January 2012 09:04, Alex Harui wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Haykel BEN JEMIA [mailto:hayke...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:23 PM
> > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Port some mobile components to web
> >
> > I have searched in the
> I would look at the git svn commands and manage my work from there if I
> wasn't a committer. I believe it'll even let you create patches from your
> Git branch for SVN.
Yep that works but it don't preserve checkins or commits (to git). So when your
code gets checked in to SVN it will a miss a
I didn't mind backward compatibility even at Flex 4.
But they left it. I guess there were some big voice.
Current UIComponent is very fat.
I believe dropping backward compatibility is neccesary in order that
Flex evolves.
New architecture and new component model are welcome.
thanks
Shigeru Nak
Hi Alex,
I wasn't implying that Adobe ought to make money from the Flash Player
directly. All I wanted to highlight
was the fact that during the Flex Summit it became apparent that there
seemed to be a disconnect between
Adobe and their enterprise customers. From what I understood left and right
(
...at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4366 - once that's
setup, the mirror(s) will be listed at git.apache.org (see links to
docs there).
-Bertrand
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Doug McCune wrote:
> ...seriously, we don't need another 500-message thread to discuss
> codenames like we had for logos...
big +1, the best way to express a cool idea is with code. Even an ugly
quick prototype usually speaks much louder than a 100-email thread.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Om wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
>> People who join project lists should review the list archives [1]
>> before posting anyway, to avoid duplicating previous discussions. This
>> should allow them
> -Original Message-
> From: Haykel BEN JEMIA [mailto:hayke...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:23 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Port some mobile components to web
>
> I have searched in the archives and did not find any message talking
> about
> th
100 matches
Mail list logo
