Brian Willoughby wrote:
> Why would you release a new version of FLAC if the binary did not
> change (on a given platform)?
The version number is attached to the source code not the binary.
BSD distros, Linux distros and things like MacPorts have scripts
that rely on the md5sum of a given vers
Martijn van Beurden wrote:
> Well, the changelog in the docs directory has been used previously by
> Josh to keep track of all changes. It seems the code in cvs had some
> bugs fixed and libFLAC got an new function
> (FLAC__format_blocksize_is_subset()) so that should be enough to warrant
> a
Martijn van Beurden wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Lots of bugs and support requests in the sourceforge tracker are related
> to the FLAC frontend, which is bundled with FLAC for Windows with the
> installer. However, I couldn't find it in git. I really thought the FLAC
> frontend was part of the projec
Sorry, I wasn't specific enough: there's a GUI bundled with the Windows
installer as well, which is called 'FLAC Frontend'. It is used a lot but
it has been broken for years. (just take a look at the Sourceforge bug
section)
Anyway, I've already started coding a replacement with MSVC 2005.
On
Martijn van Beurden wrote:
> Sorry, I wasn't specific enough: there's a GUI bundled with the Windows
> installer as well, which is called 'FLAC Frontend'. It is used a lot but
> it has been broken for years. (just take a look at the Sourceforge bug
> section)
If it was never officially part of
On 22-01-13 10:02, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
If it was never officially part of the FLAC project and FLAC source
code then bugs against it shouldn't be in FLAC's bug tracker :-). Erik
It depends on your definition of 'being officially part of'. This GUI
was developed by a 3rd party but has al
Martijn van Beurden wrote:
> It depends on your definition of 'being officially part of'.
My definition :
In the FLAC source tree and compiles on/for most platforms
FLAC compiles on/for.
> I think bundling a GUI for Windows users is still desirable, because
> they don't have nice comma
On 22-01-13 10:57, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> I disagree that it needs to be bundled with FLAC, but agree with it
> being desirable. Even if this FLAC GUI is cross platform I don't think
> it should be part of the FLAC source code tree.
That certainly makes sense. I think I'll create a new sou
