c.helmr...@ecodis.de wrote:
> In libFLAC/src/stream_encoder.c, the following C++ style comment was added
> recently:
>
> //FLAC__ASSERT(samples <= blocksize);
>
> Since all other comments in this file (and, possibly, the entire lib) are
> C-style /* */,
> I suggest to remove this line agai
Over on Hydrogenaudio "o-l-a-v" has tested 1.3.1 against 1.3.2pre3 on Windows
10 Pro x64.
The conclusion is: no errors, 1.3.2pre3 seems to produce slightly smaller files
but is also slightly slower with encoding.
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,113190.msg932918.html#msg932918
Maurits
Am 21.12.2016 um 22:55 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
Hi all,
New pre-release here is at:
http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
Really need someone to test the Windows binaries because I don't have
Windows.
I also finished my te
lvqcl.mail wrote:
> I compiled sources from flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz (MinGW/Windows)
> and ran 'make check'. The result is: "All tests passed".
>
> Then I replaced flac.exe and metaflac.exe with the files from
> flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip and re-ran the tests. Again the result
> is: "All tests passed".
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
New pre-release here is at:
http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
Really need someone to test the Windows binaries because I don't have
Windows.
Erik
I compiled sources from flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
Am 22.12.2016 um 14:31 schrieb Declan Kelly:
Do you have any of the popular front-end software that rips from CD and
then performs the encoding in parallel?
Do we have any front-end developers on this list?
I'm the developer of fre:ac that supports parallel encoding with both
libFLAC and the co
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:19:21AM +, oresteszoupa...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, I tested both the 32- and 64-bit flac.exe's on my
> Windows 10, with about 45 WAV files I have.
>
> Got some warnings about unexpected metadata, but the audio was encoded
> fine. Using the --ke
> Really need someone to test the Windows binaries because I don't have
> Windows.
Will test on Windows 7, 64-bit (C:\>ver output: version 6.1.7601). Anything
I should look at specifically and/or more closely? Is there a (full) test
suite I could run?
--Martin
> > http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
> > * Fixes for non-Intel CPUs.
>
> Compiles and runs fine on a MacMini running OpenBSD/current
> and on a BeagleBone Black running OpenBSD/current.
I can test compilation on a CentOS/VirtualBox virtual machine if
there's interest. Drive space is
> I even had a weird WAV that caused "WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format
> type 1 but bits-per-sample=24", but flac dealt with it without problems
> and the output file was fine and playable.
For what it's worth: this happens to me when I record with my Edirol R-09
in 24-bit mode. I'm guessing s
On Dec 22 08:55:42, mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
> http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz
> * Fixes for non-Intel CPUs.
Compiles and runs fine on a MacMini running OpenBSD/current
and on a BeagleBone Black running OpenBSD/current.
Jan
__
Orestes Zoupanos wrote:
> For what it's worth, I tested both the 32- and 64-bit flac.exe's on my
> Windows 10, with about 45 WAV files I have.
>
> Got some warnings about unexpected metadata, but the audio was encoded
> fine. Using the --keep-foreign-metadata flag cleared those warnings.
>
> I
For what it's worth, I tested both the 32- and 64-bit flac.exe's on my
Windows 10, with about 45 WAV files I have.
Got some warnings about unexpected metadata, but the audio was encoded
fine. Using the --keep-foreign-metadata flag cleared those warnings.
I even had a weird WAV that caused "WARN
13 matches
Mail list logo
