On 16/05/2025 09:48, Kieran O Leary wrote:
Hi
I do think this is a bug, as FFmpeg did not previously behave this
way. I made an ffv1/mkv from the test video provided, then reversed
that back to v210/mov. I got matching md5 values when decoding the
video streams, but the width values appear to b
Hi
I do think this is a bug, as FFmpeg did not previously behave this
way. I made an ffv1/mkv from the test video provided, then reversed
that back to v210/mov. I got matching md5 values when decoding the
video streams, but the width values appear to be hardcoded to the clap
value. I used mediatra
> On 15 May 2025, at 13:56, BloodMan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Everything indicates that:
>
> 1. The real, stored, image resolution is 702x576 (702/3/4? weird)
>
> 2. The display resolution is set to 720x576
>
> 3. Additionally, there is information about the image positioning offset
> 702x57
Hello,
Everything indicates that:
1. The real, stored, image resolution is 702x576 (702/3/4? weird)
2. The display resolution is set to 720x576
3. Additionally, there is information about the image positioning offset
702x576 in 720x576 resolution (in MOV headers)
So:
There is no possibil
Hello,
It looks a lot like the file is actually cropped. At least, I can’t find a
player or tool that tells me that the 720 px are still there. See the bottom
for mediainfo and exiftool reports for the FFV1 file.
Yes, the strange thing is, I did run frameMD5 checks on original and resulting
co
Hi,
On Mon 12 May 2025 at 11:01, Christian Sievers via ffmpeg-user <
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We would like to transcode v210 (uncompressed 8 bit 4:2:2 PAL) Quicktime
> mov video files to FFV1/MKV for archival purposes.
>
> ffmpeg crops these files, using Quicktime's CLAP atom
> On 15 May 2025, at 04:02, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
> On 5/14/2025 11:31 AM, Edit 'B wrote:
>> The resolution is there, but the sides are supposed to be invisible.
>> The aperture to be shown should be even smaller.
>> (SD was an overscanned format. In the full frame you should often see the
>>
On 5/14/2025 11:31 AM, Edit 'B wrote:
The resolution is there, but the sides are supposed to be invisible.
The aperture to be shown should be even smaller.
(SD was an overscanned format. In the full frame you should often see the tip
of a boom mic, that is ‘as close as possible, without being in
The resolution is there, but the sides are supposed to be invisible.
The aperture to be shown should be even smaller.
(SD was an overscanned format. In the full frame you should often see the tip
of a boom mic, that is ‘as close as possible, without being in the frame’)
Bouke
> On 14 May 2025, a
If anyone had an idea how to make sure that the resulting files have the full
720 px, I’d be grateful!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg
10 matches
Mail list logo
