> On 15 May 2025, at 04:02, Carl Zwanzig <c...@tuunq.com> wrote: > > On 5/14/2025 11:31 AM, Edit 'B wrote: >> The resolution is there, but the sides are supposed to be invisible. >> The aperture to be shown should be even smaller. >> (SD was an overscanned format. In the full frame you should often see the >> tip of a boom mic, that is ‘as close as possible, without being in the >> frame’) > > If you're trying to archive tapes, there's a good argument for capturing all > the information and maybe masking it down when viewing. > > Later, > > z!
Afaik, only the display is affected, NOT the actual captured pixels. It’s not like FFmpeg to throw away resolution without warning. But without full info I can’t prove this of course. Bouke _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
