Hi,
when i use the lame encoder to transcode a 320 bps mp3 to VBR, I can see, that
some percentage of frames is encoded to 320 bps frames, so these frames seem to
contain important data :
$ lame -V1 in.mp3 out.mp3
LAME 3.100 64bits (http://lame.sf.net)
Using polyphase lowpass filter, transiti
Hi Jesse,
W dniu 2025-04-04 o 20:11, Jesse Gordon pisze:
Good Morning BloodMan and Everybody! (Not yet solved, getting closer!)
https://video.stackexchange.com/questions/35917/ffmpeg-how-to-burn-in-the-timecode-from-a-streams-metadata
Thank you for the tips! This is getting close, but in my cas
Hello Jesse,
On 2025-04-04T06:15:40+0200, Jesse Gordon wrote:
ffmpeg -i 0.MTS -vf
"drawtext=fontsize=60:fontcolor=black:text='%{pts\:gmtime}':x=(w-text_w):y=(h-text_h)"
-acodec mp3 -y output.mp4
And that almost works, but it starts the date at "1970-01-01 00:00:00"
and counts up.
I thin
Good Morning BloodMan and Everybody! (Not yet solved, getting closer!)
https://video.stackexchange.com/questions/35917/ffmpeg-how-to-burn-in-the-timecode-from-a-streams-metadata
Thank you for the tips! This is getting close, but in my case it always
just displays "00:00:00:00" because, accor
Good morning Jesse,
W dniu 2025-04-04 o 18:37, Jesse Gordon pisze:
I'm trying to burn-in the TRUE time that the video was actually recorded
-- i.e. "2025-04-03 12:45:32.123" -- the camera records the true date
and time and both the camera AND ffplay display it during playback as a
text overlay
Hello Reino, and Everybody, (Still unsolved)
I think https://stackoverflow.com/a/67409424/2703456 can help you out
on this one.
Thank you so much for the quick response! I have updated the subject line:
I'm trying to burn-in the TRUE time that the video was actually recorded
-- i.e. "2025-0
Good Day,
I got an older Sony handycam that makes 0.MTS type files. It does
record the date and time in them, which it can optionally display during
playback.
And ffplay also displays the correct date and time as a text overlay
while vlc does not and youtube does not show the timestamp.
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 14:17:42 +0100, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
> On 15-02-2025 13:25, mb...@mbork.pl wrote:
> > time ffmpeg -y -i some_film.mp4 -i some_film.srt -ss 121052ms -to 140392ms
> > -c:v libx264 -vf scale=240:-1 -c:a copy -c:s mov_text clip.mp4
> >
> > but it didn't work - the clip was sel
On 15-02-2025 13:25, mb...@mbork.pl wrote:
Hi all,
I have a video with subtitles (as an srt file). I want to clip
a fragment from it, scaling it down to a worse resolution, _and_ put the
subtitles in the resulting clip.
This is how I do it now:
time ffmpeg -y -i some_film.mp4 -ss 121052ms -to
Hi all,
I have a video with subtitles (as an srt file). I want to clip
a fragment from it, scaling it down to a worse resolution, _and_ put the
subtitles in the resulting clip.
This is how I do it now:
time ffmpeg -y -i some_film.mp4 -ss 121052ms -to 140392ms -c:v libx264 -c:a
copy -vf subtitl
Hello,
I am going forward with my imagined workflow but now I faced a new problem:
how to put DTS to mp4.
I tried some possibilities wich I found but nothing happened.
What is the exact way for it?
Thank you,
kosza
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-u
On 1/9/2025 3:34 AM, Gennaro Esposito wrote:
My company has a video wall whose decoder is essentially designed
only for cameras, so the only devices it can view, via IP, are those
with "protocols" like RTSP or Onvif. It also has 4 HMDI/DVI ports to
view any "normal" graphic output
The protocols
The simple answer is YES, but not directly (as far as I know).
I use CasparCG with HTML producer and FFmpeg consumer for these purposes.
https://github.com/CasparCG/help/wiki/Server
чт, 9 янв. 2025 г. в 13:34, Gennaro Esposito :
>
> Greetings
>
> My company has a video wall whose decoder is essen
Greetings
My company has a video wall whose decoder is essentially designed only
for cameras, so the only devices it can view, via IP, are those with
"protocols" like RTSP or Onvif. It also has 4 HMDI/DVI ports to view any
"normal" graphic output (btw: it's a Dahua NVD0905DH-4I-4K, but the
d
On 12/19/2024 8:18 PM, Josh Mulligan wrote:
hi hello i am sorry for your troubles i am not a ffmpreg worker i use it to
eddit my animations and file and save them properly i understand that this
can be complicated but can i ask how did u get my email because i keep
getting messages like this and
hi hello i am sorry for your troubles i am not a ffmpreg worker i use it to
eddit my animations and file and save them properly i understand that this
can be complicated but can i ask how did u get my email because i keep
getting messages like this and i dont entirely remember giving concent to
spr
I want to extract the last few seconds of a GoPro video losslessly with
FFmpeg so that it keeps telemetry info and keeps the original stream order.
A GoPro video has 4 streams, in that order:
1. Stream #0:0[0x1](eng): Video
2. Stream #0:1[0x2](eng): Audio
3. Stream #0:2[0x3](eng): Data:
On 30/10/2024 5:25 am, Terje J. Hanssen wrote:
Have you simply tried
cat 001.mkv 002.mkv > 001+002.mkv
Thanks for the idea.
That concatenates the files, not the video streams, though
ffmpeg/ffprobe seems to recognise it regardless.
Unfortunately, ffprobe still shows the frames out of orde
Den 29.10.2024 14:15, skrev Flopsy:
On 29/10/2024 10:46 pm, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
Smells like someone is soring by alphabet.
Test it yourself after renaming the files 0001.mkv and 0002.mkv
See what happens then.
Thanks for the suggestion!
I gave that a try, unfortunately it didn't make
> On 29 Oct 2024, at 14:15, Flopsy wrote:
>
> On 29/10/2024 10:46 pm, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
>> Smells like someone is soring by alphabet.
>>
>> Test it yourself after renaming the files 0001.mkv and 0002.mkv
>> See what happens then.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion!
>
> I gave that a try, unfo
On 29/10/2024 10:46 pm, Bouke / edit 'B wrote:
Smells like someone is soring by alphabet.
Test it yourself after renaming the files 0001.mkv and 0002.mkv
See what happens then.
Thanks for the suggestion!
I gave that a try, unfortunately it didn't make any difference.
Even tried reversing the
Hi!
I'm trying to concatenate these two single frame videos
[https://files.catbox.moe/v85pqy.zip], but they always end up in the
wrong order.
I've tried with the following command:
ffmpeg -y -f concat -i filelist.txt -c copy outf.mkv
...where filelist.txt contains:
file '0012890a_9680.m
> On 29 Oct 2024, at 13:39, Flopsy wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to concatenate these two single frame videos
> [https://files.catbox.moe/v85pqy.zip], but they always end up in the wrong
> order.
>
> I've tried with the following command:
>
>> ffmpeg -y -f concat -i filelist.txt -c copy out
On 10/15/2024 4:42 AM, tarun singhal wrote:
What happens is often while vmaf is about to finish someone merges code and
it kills the old pod in which case I end up restarting the entire process
again.
Is there a way in ffmpeg world where I can keep a track of how much vmaf is
done and resume fro
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 21:54, Srikanth Kotagiri wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 11:39 PM tarun singhal
> wrote:
>
> > I have specified thread count as 32
> >
> > For 20 min video duration - I was able to get 1x speed
> >
> > But for 2.2hr video duration it took 12 hrs, hence lesser speed using
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 11:39 PM tarun singhal wrote:
> I have specified thread count as 32
>
> For 20 min video duration - I was able to get 1x speed
>
> But for 2.2hr video duration it took 12 hrs, hence lesser speed using same
> ffmpeg command and same underlying infrastructure
>
>
> Hence I a
I have specified thread count as 32
For 20 min video duration - I was able to get 1x speed
But for 2.2hr video duration it took 12 hrs, hence lesser speed using same
ffmpeg command and same underlying infrastructure
Hence I am curious, What are the factors which helps ffmpeg decide how many
thr
Hi Team,
I have 3-hour long video on which I run VMAF evaluation against its
transcoded version.
and generally, it takes 5-6 hr to finish.
I am running these on kubernetes pods.
I have a continuous deployment pipeline.
What happens is often while vmaf is about to finish someone merges code
On 30-09-2024 18:03, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 20:36:04 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2024-09-30 05:46 pm, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:40:44 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2024-09-30 01:34 pm, Bo Berglund wrote:
I checked with CharGPT and got the following:
[quo
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 20:36:04 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
>On 2024-09-30 05:46 pm, Bo Berglund wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:40:44 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 2024-09-30 01:34 pm, Bo Berglund wrote:
I checked with CharGPT and got the following:
[quote]
The hybri
On 2024-09-30 05:46 pm, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:40:44 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2024-09-30 01:34 pm, Bo Berglund wrote:
I checked with CharGPT and got the following:
[quote]
The hybrid_fragmented flag was added to FFmpeg in version 6.0, released on June
5, 2024. This
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:40:44 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
>On 2024-09-30 01:34 pm, Bo Berglund wrote:
>> I checked with CharGPT and got the following:
>>
>> [quote]
>> The hybrid_fragmented flag was added to FFmpeg in version 6.0, released on
>> June
>> 5, 2024. This feature allows for the creat
On 2024-09-30 01:34 pm, Bo Berglund wrote:
I checked with CharGPT and got the following:
[quote]
The hybrid_fragmented flag was added to FFmpeg in version 6.0, released on June
5, 2024. This feature allows for the creation of hybrid
fragmented/non-fragmented MP4 files, which can be useful for
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:55:54 +0200, Bo Berglund wrote:
>Basic install question on Linux:
>
>If one wants to get to the latest version of ffmpeg and it is not provided by
>the Linux distribution used, how can one upgrade to it?
I checked with CharGPT and got the following:
[quote]
The hybrid_fra
On 2024-09-29 21:59, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have created a script that downloads Internet video streams (basically news
programs) and transcodes to mp4 format with a fixed windows size.
As soon as the video stream recording ends the mp4 file can be played.
I wonder if there is a way to let ffmpeg
On 30-09-2024 07:55, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:49:34 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2024-09-30 01:29 am, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have created a script that downloads Internet video streams (basically news
programs) and transcodes to mp4 format with a fixed windows size.
As soon
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:49:34 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
>On 2024-09-30 01:29 am, Bo Berglund wrote:
>> I have created a script that downloads Internet video streams (basically news
>> programs) and transcodes to mp4 format with a fixed windows size.
>> As soon as the video stream recording ends
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 9:19 PM Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-09-30 01:29 am, Bo Berglund wrote:
> > I have created a script that downloads Internet video streams (basically
> news
> > programs) and transcodes to mp4 format with a fixed windows size.
> > As soon as the video stream recording en
On 2024-09-30 01:29 am, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have created a script that downloads Internet video streams (basically news
programs) and transcodes to mp4 format with a fixed windows size.
As soon as the video stream recording ends the mp4 file can be played.
I wonder if there is a way to let f
I have created a script that downloads Internet video streams (basically news
programs) and transcodes to mp4 format with a fixed windows size.
As soon as the video stream recording ends the mp4 file can be played.
I wonder if there is a way to let ffmpeg do two things at the same time:
- download
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:06:11 +0200, Bo Berglund
wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:50:01 +0200, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
How can I reduce this to only show some progress messages without all this
noise?
Is there a verbocity setting I can use?
My download script reformats the video output on the go t
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:06:11 +0200, Bo Berglund wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:50:01 +0200, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
>
>>> How can I reduce this to only show some progress messages without all this
>>> noise?
>>> Is there a verbocity setting I can use?
>>>
>>> My download script reformats the video
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:50:01 +0200, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
>> How can I reduce this to only show some progress messages without all this
>> noise?
>> Is there a verbocity setting I can use?
>>
>> My download script reformats the video output on the go to a specific size
>> such
>> that it can be
When downloading a live stream on Linux using ffmpeg I get a lot of
noise on the
screen like:
[hls @ 0x17859d0] Skip ('#EXT-X-VERSION:3')
[https @ 0x1a03eb0] Opening 'https://somesite.com/stream/bc-1727330916096.ts'
for reading
frame= 628 fps= 41 q=32.0 size=1280kB time=00:00:20.99 bitrate=
When downloading a live stream on Linux using ffmpeg I get a lot of noise on the
screen like:
[hls @ 0x17859d0] Skip ('#EXT-X-VERSION:3')
[https @ 0x1a03eb0] Opening 'https://somesite.com/stream/bc-1727330916096.ts'
for reading
frame= 628 fps= 41 q=32.0 size=1280kB time=00:00:20.99 bitrate=
4
> I have tried the following commands
>
> ffmpeg -err_detect ignore_err -i old.mp4 -c copy new.mp4
> ...
> [mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2 @ 00158b00] stream 1, contradictionary STSC and
> STCO
> [mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2 @ 00158b00] error reading header
Hmm, I see.
Maybe one last "cheap" attempt: if yo
Thank you but it produces the same result as before.
I have tried the following commands
ffmpeg -err_detect ignore_err -i old.mp4 -c copy new.mp4
ffmpeg -i old.mp4 -map 0:v -c copy video_only.mp4
ffmpeg -i old.mp4 -map 0:a -c copy audio_only.aac
ffmpeg -i old.mp4 -fflags +genpts -c copy new.mp
Hi, Vincent,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Let me explain the real case: I have many MP4 files which lost some data in
the tail,
which make them not playable. I analyze these files manually and find the
ftyp and
moov boxes and their child boxes are all OK. But part of the data in mdat
box are
l
Hi, Gia
Thank you very much.
The only issue is that the tool needs a similar video to fix the truncated
one. For most of the cases, it is rather difficult to do so. So I still
hope to be able to reassemble a new MP4 with all the existing boxes and
packets in the original MP4 without a reference,
On 9/22/24 09:22, Alan Chen via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> Hi, Vincent,
>
> Thank you for your suggestion.
>
> Let me explain the real case: I have many MP4 files which lost some data in
> the tail,
> which make them not playable. I analyze these files manually and find the
> ftyp and
> moov
Hi, Vincent,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Let me explain the real case: I have many MP4 files which lost some data in
the tail,
which make them not playable. I analyze these files manually and find the
ftyp and
moov boxes and their child boxes are all OK. But part of the data in mdat
box are
lo
>
> In that case, what are some video editor software does with the videos?
> They can cut some frames from the original video and create a new MP4 file.
> Are these software just decode and uncompress everything, then remove some
> frames, then re-encode and re-compress the remaining video?
>
Tha
>
>
>
> > So, how to reassemble the raw packet data back to a new MP4 file?
>
> That's not possible in general, because your raw packets do not
> contain sufficient information to create an MP4 file.
>
> I suggest that you explain why you are actually doing all of that.
> What is the purpose, what
Thank you.
In that case, what are some video editor software does with the videos?
They can cut some frames from the original video and create a new MP4 file.
Are these software just decode and uncompress everything, then remove some
frames, then re-encode and re-compress the remaining video?
___
Alan Chen via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> ffprobe -print_format json -show_packets -show_streams -show_entries
> packet=pts,duration,size,codec_type,pos test.mp4 > test.mp4.info
You need to provide more information.
What are the contents of test.mp4? What codecs?
> I extract the raw data of the pack
On 21-09-2024 12:32, Alan Chen via ffmpeg-user wrote:
What I remove is the last video and audio packet in each stream. All the
meta data are still there, together with all remaining packet data as
separate files. But I don't know how to utilize them in the commandline to
reassemble the packets
What I remove is the last video and audio packet in each stream. All the
meta data are still there, together with all remaining packet data as
separate files. But I don't know how to utilize them in the commandline to
reassemble the packets.
___
ffmpeg-us
On 21-09-2024 10:57, Alan Chen via ffmpeg-user wrote:
I try on another MP4 file with H264 codec video, but still get the same
result.
___
Your file needs to conform to te specifications in either part 12 and/or
14 of the standard in which the .MP4
I try on another MP4 file with H264 codec video, but still get the same
result.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org
On 21-09-2024 04:39, Alan Chen via ffmpeg-user wrote:
I am using ffmpeg.
I use the following command to get all packet info:
ffprobe -print_format json -show_packets -show_streams -show_entries
packet=pts,duration,size,codec_type,pos test.mp4 > test.mp4.info
Then based on each packet info, suc
I am using ffmpeg.
I use the following command to get all packet info:
ffprobe -print_format json -show_packets -show_streams -show_entries
packet=pts,duration,size,codec_type,pos test.mp4 > test.mp4.info
Then based on each packet info, such as the one below:
{
"codec_type":
Dan Naughton wrote:
> ffmpeg mjpeg streaming is working (VLC tested as a client)
>
> This is the command:
> ffmpeg -stream_loop -1 -re -i file.mjpeg -an -c copy -listen 1 -f mpjpeg
> http://192.168.1.7:8080
>
> But when the client closed the connection - ffmpeg exits:
> [...]
> Is ther
ffmpeg mjpeg streaming is working (VLC tested as a client)
This is the command:
ffmpeg -stream_loop -1 -re -i file.mjpeg -an -c copy -listen 1 -f mpjpeg
http://192.168.1.7:8080
But when the client closed the connection - ffmpeg exits:
Press [q] to stop, [?] for help
[vost#0:0/copy @ 0x55aa2a61f
пн, 9 сент. 2024 г., 23:19 Andrew Randrianasulu :
>
>
> пн, 9 сент. 2024 г., 23:04 Andrew Randrianasulu :
>
>>
>>
>> пн, 9 сент. 2024 г., 18:06 Andrew Randrianasulu > >:
>>
>>> Looking at libswscale/swscale.c (due to
>>> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11182#comment:5) I do not understand
>>> how i
пн, 9 сент. 2024 г., 23:04 Andrew Randrianasulu :
>
>
> пн, 9 сент. 2024 г., 18:06 Andrew Randrianasulu :
>
>> Looking at libswscale/swscale.c (due to
>> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11182#comment:5) I do not understand
>> how it works :)
>>
>> why shits to 11 and to 12 ?
>>
>> // FIXME all pal
пн, 9 сент. 2024 г., 18:06 Andrew Randrianasulu :
> Looking at libswscale/swscale.c (due to
> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11182#comment:5) I do not understand
> how it works :)
>
> why shits to 11 and to 12 ?
>
> // FIXME all pal and rgb srcFormats could do this conversion as well
> // FIXME al
Looking at libswscale/swscale.c (due to
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11182#comment:5) I do not understand
how it works :)
why shits to 11 and to 12 ?
// FIXME all pal and rgb srcFormats could do this conversion as well
// FIXME all scalers more complex than bilinear could do half of this transf
I'm sorry this mail is going to be rather long. However, I would
like to explain my opinion on this matter in detail.
I would also like to kindly ask everybody to calm down and refrain
from further ad-hominem attacks, because these are not going to make
things better for anybody.
Thank you for
avid Niklas
Subject: [FFmpeg-user] How does one apply a filter option for a limited amount
of time?
Hello,
Here's my command:
ffmpeg -i in.mp4 -filter_complex
"drawbox=w=1920:h=1080:color=black@1:t=fill" out.mp4
How do I apply it for only a few seconds to a
Hello,
Here's my command:
ffmpeg -i in.mp4 -filter_complex
"drawbox=w=1920:h=1080:color=black@1:t=fill" out.mp4
How do I apply it for only a few seconds to a specific time in the video?
Thanks!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https
Am 21.08.24 um 14:39 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
To me it's very useful. Imagine you have huge collection of pictures and
videos. If I do some compression later, preserving the mtime allows me
to simply use the file manager for listing the files in their right
order
when you have a huge collection
Am 21.08.24 um 14:39 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
and I'm not aware of any program that overrides it
I've seen this plenty of times. The one, which instantly comes in memory is
IrfanView. There it's my standard setting. From there I was inspired for my
proposal. I also remember some MP3-tag editors, w
Am 21.08.24 um 14:39 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Second, implementing the proposed option correctly is actually very
non-trivial, especially considering that there can be multiple input
files and multiple output files, and there needs to be some syntax
and built-in logic for mapping mtime from input fil
Am 21.08.24 um 12:45 schrieb Oliver Fromme:
I'm sorry this mail is going to be rather long. However, I would
like to explain my opinion on this matter in detail.
Hollala, thanks for your effort. German accuracy? ;-)
Well, I'm not sure who brought up the "OS call" argument -- and why.
I thi
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 12:15, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> Oliver Fromme (12024-08-21):
> > I'm sorry this mail is going to be rather long. However, I would
> > like to explain my opinion on this matter in detail.
>
> You are more patient than this issue deserves.
I enjoyed reading Oliver's explana
Am 21.08.24 um 12:48 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
So for 1. it must be additionally:
In case of output file existence 2 additional OS operations are needed
and executed: Write a message to system output stream + read and parse
users answer from system input stream.
As discovered by James Ralston, the
Oliver Fromme (12024-08-21):
> I'm sorry this mail is going to be rather long. However, I would
> like to explain my opinion on this matter in detail.
You are more patient than this issue deserves.
> In fact, I can rather imagine use cases to preserve the *atime*
> (access time) of the input fil
Am 21.08.24 um 10:56 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 20.08.24 um 21:33 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
There seems some need to outline and precise my original message.
1. For the security of existing data and in some way for convenience (avoid the
need to create the potentially overwritten data again) FFmpeg
I'm sorry this mail is going to be rather long. However, I would
like to explain my opinion on this matter in detail.
I would also like to kindly ask everybody to calm down and refrain
from further ad-hominem attacks, because these are not going to make
things better for anybody.
Ulf Zibis wrote
Am 21.08.24 um 10:40 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 20.08.24 um 21:59 schrieb Rob Hallam:
It is unlikely at this point you will receive an argument you deem
applicable.
A call to an OS function is not the same as managing filesystem-level
metadata.
If you really want it, it is possible for you to
Am 20.08.24 um 21:33 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 14.08.24 um 17:20 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 12.08.24 um 19:04 schrieb Mark Filipak:
That's a question for your operating system. I can change file times
to whatever I want via the TotalCommander file browser. There are
probably others.
Isn't remo
Am 20.08.24 um 21:59 schrieb Rob Hallam:
It is unlikely at this point you will receive an argument you deem applicable.
A call to an OS function is not the same as managing filesystem-level metadata.
If you really want it, it is possible for you to write and maintain
your own small patch that
> I suspect the reason why ffmpeg implements its current (incorrect)
> behavior is because Windows lacks the Unix/Linux equivalent of O_EXCL.
Consider the CreateFileA function in fileapi.h with the dwCreationDisposition
argument set to CREATE_NEW, which would fail on the existence of the target
On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 20:33, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> 4. I'm fine with the result, that FFmpeg developers don't want to provide my
> proposal.
>
> But please *avoid inapplicable arguments*.
It is unlikely at this point you will receive an argument you deem applicable.
A call to an OS functio
Am 14.08.24 um 17:20 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 12.08.24 um 19:04 schrieb Mark Filipak:
That's a question for your operating system. I can change file times to
whatever I want via the TotalCommander file browser. There are probably others.
Isn't removing existing output files samely a question
Am 18.08.24 um 11:38 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 18.08.24 um 00:54 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 18.08.24 um 00:26 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 17.08.24 um 22:33 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
And WHAT then happens with the original file, when write creates ANOTHER file
???
NOTHING'
Another interesting va
Am 19.08.24 um 17:40 schrieb James Ralston:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 6:41 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.08.24 um 07:56 schrieb James Ralston:
The fact that ffmpeg does it this way [queries for the existence
of the output file itself) is a bug (albeit perhaps one of
convenience, since ffmpeg
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 6:41 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 19.08.24 um 07:56 schrieb James Ralston:
>
> > The fact that ffmpeg does it this way [queries for the existence
> > of the output file itself) is a bug (albeit perhaps one of
> > convenience, since ffmpeg supports more operating systems th
Am 19.08.24 um 07:56 schrieb James Ralston:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 3:54 PM Ulf Zibis wrote:
You can spin it however you like. The logic around the ‘-y’ option
requires an extra additional OS call
It shouldn’t.
in this case querying the existence of the file, before it is
overwritten.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 3:54 PM Ulf Zibis wrote:
> You can spin it however you like. The logic around the ‘-y’ option
> requires an extra additional OS call
It shouldn’t.
> in this case querying the existence of the file, before it is
> overwritten.
The fact that ffmpeg does it this way is a b
Am 18.08.24 um 12:16 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 18.08.24 um 12:12 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 18.08.24 um 03:04 schrieb Oliver Fromme:
Would you please stop this? This kind of discussion is not going to
improve FFmpeg. You're just annoying everybody.
You mean the discussion about smartness, dumbn
Am 18.08.24 um 12:12 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 18.08.24 um 03:04 schrieb Oliver Fromme:
Would you please stop this? This kind of discussion is not going to
improve FFmpeg. You're just annoying everybody.
You mean the discussion about smartness, dumbness and nonsense? I agree
with you.
Please
Am 18.08.24 um 03:04 schrieb Oliver Fromme:
Would you please stop this? This kind of discussion is not going to
improve FFmpeg. You're just annoying everybody.
You mean the discussion about smartness, dumbness and nonsense? I agree with
you.
Please address the originator.
Cheers Ulf
which is
identically handeled in both cases
you pretended "But for convenience FFmpeg CLI provides option `-y` for
this task" which is technically nonsense - that's the whole topic - period
so your are talking nosense all the time
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betre
ouke wrote "_not_ -y in line". This is the
opposite case.
you pretended "But for convenience FFmpeg CLI provides option `-y` for
this task" which is technically nonsense - that's the whole topic - period
Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----
Betreff: Re: [FFmpeg-us
Am 18.08.24 um 00:46 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 18.08.24 um 00:26 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 17.08.24 um 21:53 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
but there is no delete action
You can spin it however you like. The logic around the ‘-y’ option
requires an extra additional OS call, in this case querying the
exi
Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Am 18.08.24 um 00:26 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > Am 17.08.24 um 22:33 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
> > >
> > > Am 17.08.24 um 22:10 schrieb Bouke / Videotoolshed:
> > > > ..., it will be ‘another’ file with the same name.
> > > And WHAT then happens with the original file, when write
Am 18.08.24 um 00:26 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 17.08.24 um 22:33 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 17.08.24 um 22:10 schrieb Bouke / Videotoolshed:
..., it will be ‘another’ file with the same name.
And WHAT then happens with the original file, when write creates ANOTHER file
???
NOTHING
Another i
Am 18.08.24 um 00:30 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 17.08.24 um 23:07 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 17.08.24 um 22:10 schrieb Bouke / Videotoolshed:
The user input is parsed as ‘if file exists and not -y in line, abort’
FFmpeg CLI does not abort in that case, it outputs a question to system out
strea
Am 18.08.24 um 00:26 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 17.08.24 um 21:53 schrieb Ulf Zibis:
but there is no delete action
You can spin it however you like. The logic around the ‘-y’ option requires an
extra additional OS call, in this case querying the existence of the file,
before it is overwritt
1 - 100 of 1165 matches
Mail list logo