On 09/06/2025 07.55, Reino Wijnsma wrote:
Hello Mark,
Hello, Reino.
On 2025-06-08T19:27:20+0200, Mark Filipak
wrote:
I want archival quality.
On 2025-06-07T21:17:03+0200, Mark Filipak
wrote:
ffmpeg^
-i "c:\Ashra, Correlations [1979] chapters.txt"^
-i c:\01.WAV^
-i c:\02.WAV^
-i
Hello Mark,
On 2025-06-08T19:27:20+0200, Mark Filipak
wrote:
I want archival quality.
On 2025-06-07T21:17:03+0200, Mark Filipak
wrote:
ffmpeg^
-i "c:\Ashra, Correlations [1979] chapters.txt"^
-i c:\01.WAV^
-i c:\02.WAV^
-i c:\03.WAV^
-i c:\04.WAV^
-i c:\05.WAV^
-i c:\06.WAV^
On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 11:55 AM Reino Wijnsma wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> On 2025-06-08T19:27:20+0200, Mark Filipak
> wrote:
> > I want archival quality.
> On 2025-06-07T21:17:03+0200, Mark Filipak
> wrote:
> > ffmpeg^
> > -i "c:\Ashra, Correlations [1979] chapters.txt"^
> > -i c:\01.WAV^
> >
Am 08.06.25 um 21:53 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 08/06/2025 14.54, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:31 PM Mark Filipak <
Do you ever encode music, Paul? If so, what do you use?
FLAC only.
Yes, Z has convinced me. Thanks to both you and Z. I will use flac-in-m4a
boy where comes
Am 08.06.25 um 20:10 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 08/06/2025 13.52, Bernhard Döbler wrote:
Am 08.06.2025 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Filipak:
FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the
future.
What constitutes a standard?
That's a good question. To me, it's a construction d
Am 08.06.25 um 19:43 schrieb Mark Filipak:
On 08/06/2025 13.31, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:27 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command should I use?
I want archival quality.
In other circles, archival
On 08/06/2025 16.05, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/8/2025 12:50 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I will go with FLAC due to endorsement by the US National Archives
BTW it took me under 2 minutes to find that; a little more research before asserting things might be
productive.
z!
I apologize, Z. I was n
On 6/8/2025 12:50 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
I will go with FLAC due to endorsement by the US National Archives
BTW it took me under 2 minutes to find that; a little more research
before asserting things might be productive.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailin
On 08/06/2025 14.54, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:31 PM Mark Filipak <
Do you ever encode music, Paul? If so, what do you use?
FLAC only.
Yes, Z has convinced me. Thanks to both you and Z. I will use flac-in-m4a.
___
ffmpeg-user m
On 08/06/2025 14.50, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:10 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
Am 08.06.2025 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Filipak:
FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the
future.
It is, as already covered.
Th
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:31 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On 08/06/2025 14.26, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:18 PM Mark Filipak <
> > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/06/2025 13.51, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> >>> O
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:10 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
Am 08.06.2025 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Filipak:
FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the
future.
It is, as already covered.
The Internet Engineering Task Force is not a
On 08/06/2025 14.27, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:10 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
On 08/06/2025 13.52, Bernhard Döbler wrote:
Am 08.06.2025 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Filipak:
FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the
On 08/06/2025 14.26, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:18 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
On 08/06/2025 13.51, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:42 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
ffmpeg^
-i "c:\c
Well, I see one mistake I made...
Correction:
"(44.1 k-samples/sec/channel)*(16 bits/sample)=705.6 k-bits/second/channel"
was
"(41.1 k-samples/sec/channel)*(16 bits/sample)=657.6 k-bits/second/channel"
On 08/06/2025 04.47, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
On 08-06-2025 04:21, Mark Filipak wrote:
The scrip
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:10 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On 08/06/2025 13.52, Bernhard Döbler wrote:
> > Am 08.06.2025 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Filipak:
> >> FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the
> future.
> >
> > What constitutes
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 6:18 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On 08/06/2025 13.51, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:42 PM Mark Filipak <
> > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> >
> >> ffmpeg^
> >>-i "c:\chapters.txt"^
> >>-i
On 08/06/2025 13.51, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:42 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
ffmpeg^
-i "c:\chapters.txt"^
-i c:\01.WAV^
-i c:\02.WAV^
-i c:\03.WAV^
-i c:\04.WAV^
-i c:\05.WAV^
-i c:\06.WAV^
-i c:\07.WAV^
-i c
On 08/06/2025 13.52, Bernhard Döbler wrote:
Am 08.06.2025 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Filipak:
FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the future.
What constitutes a standard?
That's a good question. To me, it's a construction document from an authority
on the art.
The In
Hi Mark,
W dniu 2025-06-08 o 19:47, Mark Filipak pisze:
On 08/06/2025 13.31, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:27 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
In other circles, archival quality means lossless, thus FLAC and not AAC.
FLAC is not a standard. I d
On 08/06/2025 13.52, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/8/2025 10:50 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Thanks, Carl.
Who?? We've been over this before.
My email client says "Carl Zwanzig wrote:". I'm sorry I forgot that you object to "Carl". I'm just
trying to do the best I can. Please forgive me.
How do
On 6/8/2025 10:50 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
Thanks, Carl.
Who?? We've been over this before.
How do I do pcm-in-m4a?
You don't, you leave them in well-supported wav files.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.or
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:42 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> ffmpeg^
> -i "c:\chapters.txt"^
> -i c:\01.WAV^
> -i c:\02.WAV^
> -i c:\03.WAV^
> -i c:\04.WAV^
> -i c:\05.WAV^
> -i c:\06.WAV^
> -i c:\07.WAV^
> -i c:\08.WAV^
> -filter_complex
> "
Am 08.06.2025 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Filipak:
FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the
future.
What constitutes a standard?
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc9639.html
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://
On 08/06/2025 13.47, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 6/8/2025 10:43 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the future.
Leave them in PCM then, that'll be around forever. Want them to be smaller? gzip the files; sure,
you can't just play those directly,
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:47 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On 08/06/2025 13.31, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:27 PM Mark Filipak <
> > markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> >
> >> For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command shou
On 6/8/2025 10:43 AM, Mark Filipak wrote:
FLAC is not a standard. I don't trust that it will be around in the future.
Leave them in PCM then, that'll be around forever. Want them to be
smaller? gzip the files; sure, you can't just play those directly, but
'archival' doesn't necessarily also m
On 08/06/2025 13.31, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:27 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command should I use?
I want archival quality.
In other circles, archival quality means lossless, thus FLAC and not AAC
On 08/06/2025 13.31, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:27 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command should I use?
I want archival quality.
In other circles, archival quality means lossless, thus FLAC and not AAC
ffmpeg^
-i "c:\chapters.txt"^
-i c:\01.WAV^
-i c:\02.WAV^
-i c:\03.WAV^
-i c:\04.WAV^
-i c:\05.WAV^
-i c:\06.WAV^
-i c:\07.WAV^
-i c:\08.WAV^
-filter_complex
"[1:0][2:0][3:0][4:0][5:0][6:0][7:0][8:0]concat=n=8:v=0:a=1[out]"^
-map_metadata 0 -map "[out]"^
-c aac -b:a 657.6k^
"c:\Ashra
Hey, Paul.
On 08/06/2025 13.23, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:19 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command should I use?
There are numerous infos on web that native, ffmpeg AAC encoder is
sub-optimal on low bit
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:27 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command should I use?
>
> I want archival quality.
>
In other circles, archival quality means lossless, thus FLAC and not AAC.
> _
For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command should I use?
I want archival quality.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg
On 08-06-2025 18:59, Mark Filipak wrote:
On 08/06/2025 04.47, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
On 08-06-2025 04:21, Mark Filipak wrote:
The script above provoked this: "Too many bits 15269.442177 > 12288
per frame requested, clamping to max". Of course, I have no idea
what that's about. Do you? "Too ma
On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 5:19 PM Mark Filipak <
markfilipak.imdb-at-gmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command should I use?
>
There are numerous infos on web that native, ffmpeg AAC encoder is
sub-optimal on low bit-rates.
For above question, audio filter stack wi
For AAC encoding of pcm_s16le, what command should I use?
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubsc
On 08/06/2025 04.47, Ferdi Scholten wrote:
On 08-06-2025 04:21, Mark Filipak wrote:
The script above provoked this: "Too many bits 15269.442177 > 12288 per frame requested, clamping
to max". Of course, I have no idea what that's about. Do you? "Too many bits"?
Simple, the fixed bitrate you spec
On 08-06-2025 04:21, Mark Filipak wrote:
The script above provoked this: "Too many bits 15269.442177 > 12288
per frame requested, clamping to max". Of course, I have no idea what
that's about. Do you? "Too many bits"?
Simple, the fixed bitrate you specified is very much too high for the
au
Here's my latest script. It makes aac-in-m4a
ffmpeg^
-i "c:\chapters.txt"^
-i c:\01.WAV^
-i c:\02.WAV^
-i c:\03.WAV^
-i c:\04.WAV^
-i c:\05.WAV^
-i c:\06.WAV^
-i c:\07.WAV^
-i c:\08.WAV^
-filter_complex
"[1:0][2:0][3:0][4:0][5:0][6:0][7:0][8:0]concat=n=8:v=0:a=1[out]"^
-map_metadata 0
39 matches
Mail list logo
