[FFmpeg-devel] root access voting

Hi At teh current videolan developer days there where several surprise votes on FFmpegs infractructure. And to the best of my knowledge no remote participation and no recording. So let me try to reply to the idea of the general assembly choosing who has root access. We have seen a raise of incr

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] root access voting

On 11/2/2024 4:34 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi At teh current videolan developer days there where several surprise votes on FFmpegs infractructure. And to the best of my knowledge no remote participation and no recording. So let me try to reply to the idea of the general assembly choosi

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] INSTALL: explain the circular dependency issue and solution

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- INSTALL.md | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/INSTALL.md b/INSTALL.md index 3b220bc6ff2..4398ca12fa1 100644 --- a/INSTALL.md +++ b/INSTALL.md @@ -15,3 +15,11 @@ NOTICE -- - Non system dependencies (e.g. libx264, libvpx) are

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] INSTALL: explain the circular dependency issue and solution

On 11/2/2024 2:24 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- INSTALL.md | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/INSTALL.md b/INSTALL.md index 3b220bc6ff2..4398ca12fa1 100644 --- a/INSTALL.md +++ b/INSTALL.md @@ -15,3 +15,11 @@ NOTICE --

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v6] avcodec/jpeg2000: Fix FF_DWT97_INT to pass the conformance testing defined in ISO/IEC 15444-4

The patch LTGM with the following nits: - the commit message width - an extra empty line in decode_refpass() Both can be fixed at merge time. A larger question, which is probably best left to later or never, is whether we care that the compression ratio has been changed for a given value of the

[FFmpeg-devel] Develop FFmpeg through your browser?

Hi Should we move to a different development system ? I dont know, but I belive we should carefully consider if we want to move to a gitlab like system that is a commercal / corporate and not community driven system that we can get stuck in. Companies get sold change owner/leader, and in no time g

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 00/19] fate: fix several dependencies

On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 02:09:16AM +0200, Nicolas Gaullier wrote: > It is impossible to double check every single test case. > With my default basic setup, fate-list is unchanged, which is a good start... > Nothing extraordinary, but here is a limited setup I used: > https://pastebin.com/GZ72Qz7r

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 11/15] avformat/flacdec:Return correct error-codes on read-failure

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:44:37AM +0100, Tomas Härdin wrote: > tis 2024-10-29 klockan 18:42 +0100 skrev Michael Niedermayer: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 03:50:05PM +0100, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > > Reasonable enough. Might want a sample > > > > > > Spotify comments > > > > > > Une

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] swscale/swscale_unscaled: add swscale/swscale_unscaled: add unscaled x2rgb10le to gbrp10

Signed-off-by: James Almer --- libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c | 74 +++ tests/ref/pixfmt/gbrp10-x2bgr10le | 2 +- tests/ref/pixfmt/gbrp10-x2rgb10le | 2 +- 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c b/libswscale/s

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v7] avcodec/jpeg2000: Fix FF_DWT97_INT to pass the conformance testing defined in ISO/IEC 15444-4

Fix for the integer version of the inverse 9-7 DWT processing (FF_DWT97_INT, https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10123), which is activated with `-flags +bitexact`. I went through the code path for the DWT 9-7 transform (integer) and improved precision to match conformance codestream. As a result, the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V6] Patch to add interlaced HEVC decoding to HEVCDEC

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:45:12PM -0500, Jose Santiago wrote: [...] > hevcdec.c | 24 +++ > hevcdec.h | 13 + > refs.c| 417 > -- > sei.c | 16 -- > sei.h | 129 ++- > 5 files changed, 574 insertions

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fftools/ffplay: fix crash when vk renderer is null

My patch formatting was broken by my email client, and I resent it, but it created a new thread in the mailing list. Please let me know if I should resent it as a reply on the same thread. 31 Oct 2024 19:54:51 Michael Niedermayer : > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 02:40:57PM +0100, Leandro Santiago wr

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fate/pixfmts: add an 8bits variant of the new tests

Signed-off-by: James Almer --- tests/fate-run.sh | 10 ++ tests/fate/pixfmt.mak | 28 tests/ref/pixfmt/gbrp-bgr24 | 2 ++ tests/ref/pixfmt/gbrp-gray| 2 ++ tests/ref/pixfmt/gbrp-monob | 2 ++ tests/ref/pixfmt/

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fate: use rawvideo muxer for filter and pixel format tests

On 10/31/2024 4:22 PM, James Almer wrote: Using NUT is not ideal as not all these pixel formats have a defined fourcc in the NUT spec, and we don't care about encapsulation, only actual pixel output. Will apply soon unless someone objects. OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital s

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/jpegxl_parser: check entropy_decoder_read_symbol return value

Hi On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 01:50:38PM +0100, Kacper Michajłow wrote: > Found by OSS-Fuzz. > > Signed-off-by: Kacper Michajłow > --- > libavcodec/jpegxl_parser.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) patch makes sense, ill leave to Leo Izen to apply, as its his code but