Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg at NAB 2024

2024-03-31 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 11/1/2023 9:25 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > This is certainly interesting considering we just had a giant thread about > not using > or using SPI, with multiple people accused of having corporate interests. Adding to the list of wtf NAB things: https://twitter.com/JanetGrecoBP/status/1773342

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg at NAB 2024

2023-11-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 9:46 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 02:26:22PM +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > [...] > > I would not find it acceptable for SPI to pay these costs. I do not feel > > donors would want their money spent on a corporate show in Las

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg at NAB 2024

2023-11-19 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 02:26:22PM +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote: [...] > I would not find it acceptable for SPI to pay these costs. I do not feel > donors would want their money spent on a corporate show in Las Vegas. all SPI refunds must be posted to the mailing list and approved b

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg at NAB 2024

2023-11-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023, 14:05 Derek Buitenhuis, wrote: > Hi, > > Followup question... > > On 11/1/2023 9:25 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > > This is certainly interesting considering we just had a giant thread > about not using > > or using SPI, with multiple people accused of having corporate intere

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg at NAB 2024

2023-11-19 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 11/19/2023 2:19 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-November/317196.html FFS. Here is the right link: http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-November/316603.html - Deek ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ff

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg at NAB 2024

2023-11-19 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 11/19/2023 2:05 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > So who signed? The "anonymous" corproate entity, on behalf of FFmpeg, with out > our consent? http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-November/317196.html Prob unrelated I am sure. - Derek ___ ffmp

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg at NAB 2024

2023-11-19 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
Hi, Followup question... On 11/1/2023 9:25 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > This is certainly interesting considering we just had a giant thread about > not using > or using SPI, with multiple people accused of having corporate interests. I noticed FFmpeg is on the NAB floor plan. This implies FF

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg at NAB 2024

2023-11-02 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Hi, FWIW, FFmpeg will most probably be granted a free community booth at the next SCaLE in 21x a month earlier also in South-Western USA. If this unfolds as it usually does, we will get confirmation in January. There are no hidden costs *there*. But of course it's a very different crowd of vis

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg at NAB 2024

2023-11-01 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 20:37, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel < ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > Hi, > > FFmpeg will have a booth at the next NAB from April 14th to 17th 2024 in > Las > Vegas [1]! > > We reiceived an anonymous corporate sponsorship for the booth, so there > are no > costs for the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg at NAB 2024

2023-11-01 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 11/1/2023 8:37 PM, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > We reiceived an anonymous corporate sponsorship for the booth, so there are > no > costs for the FFmpeg project to it (and no obligations, of course). This is certainly interesting considering we just had a giant thread about not us