On Sun, 19 Nov 2023, 14:05 Derek Buitenhuis, <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Followup question... > > On 11/1/2023 9:25 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > > This is certainly interesting considering we just had a giant thread > about not using > > or using SPI, with multiple people accused of having corporate interests. > > I noticed FFmpeg is on the NAB floor plan. > > This implies FFmpeg has signed a contract with NAB, as to my knowledge, > you are > not on the floor plan without doing that. > > There is one slight problem here... FFmpeg does not have a legal entity in > which > such a contract could have been signed. > > So who signed? The "anonymous" corproate entity, on behalf of FFmpeg, with > out > our consent? > > Pardon my French, but this is sketchy as all fuck. > In addition, the remaining costs of the booth, which in my experience total around twice as much as the floor space itself need to be paid by this corporate contributor. I would not find it acceptable for SPI to pay these costs. I do not feel donors would want their money spent on a corporate show in Las Vegas. Also no plan has been provided about who will actually be present on the booth. Ragards, Kieran Kunhya > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
