On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 01:32:54AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
> This question needs to be awnsered before the next release because
> the ABI would b
Le primidi 11 prairial, an CCXXIV, Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> Please state clearly if you agree to add AVClass&AVOption to
> AVCodecParameters or if you disagree about adding it or if you dont
> care either way
Since it is necessary to break the tie, I express clearly that I am against,
becau
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:07:22PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 01:32:54AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> > resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
> > Thi
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 01:32:54AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
> This question needs to be awnsered before the next release because
> the ABI would b
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 01:32:54AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
> This question needs to be awnsered before the next release because
> the ABI would b
On Sun, 29 May 2016 01:32:54 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
> This question needs to be awnsered before the next release because
> the ABI would be bro
Le primidi 11 prairial, an CCXXIV, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit :
> Probably, yes. Is it just Thilo or are others missing also? What were the
> criteria again?
There are no criteria. There were criteria for the initial list, but after
that the list evolves by co-optation.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Geor
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 09:39:58PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Thilo,
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Thilo Borgmann
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > [...]
> > >>
> > >> The vote will end 1 week from now, simple 50% majority (Yes vs no)
> > >> I dont really know who shou
On Sonntag, 29. Mai 2016 16:45:26 CEST Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Thilo Borgmann
> wrote:
>
> > Am 29.05.16 um 01:32 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> > > resolve if AVClass
Am 30.05.16 um 14:15 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> Rostislav Pehlivanov gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Anyone can go to fairs, mentor for GSoC, write on the MLs, etc.
>> Not everyone has the time.
>
> This is true, I completely agree.
> I am not sure if I understand the relevance though: The list of
>
Rostislav Pehlivanov gmail.com> writes:
> Anyone can go to fairs, mentor for GSoC, write on the MLs, etc.
> Not everyone has the time.
This is true, I completely agree.
I am not sure if I understand the relevance though: The list of
people on the voters committee contains both people who have
On 30 May 2016 at 12:20, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Rostislav Pehlivanov gmail.com> writes:
>
> > We agreed the committee should contain only active contributors.
> > The members that were added later were added because they were
> > slightly below the threshold but had done much during the last
Rostislav Pehlivanov gmail.com> writes:
> We agreed the committee should contain only active contributors.
> The members that were added later were added because they were
> slightly below the threshold but had done much during the last
> few months.
>
> In short, no.
Thilo has presented FFm
On 30 May 2016 at 10:34, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Am 30.05.16 um 03:39 schrieb Ronald S. Bultje:
> > Hi Thilo,
> >
> > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Thilo Borgmann
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> [...]
>
> The vote will end 1 week from now, simple 50% majority (Yes vs
Am 30.05.16 um 03:39 schrieb Ronald S. Bultje:
> Hi Thilo,
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Thilo Borgmann
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> [...]
The vote will end 1 week from now, simple 50% majority (Yes vs no)
I dont really know who should be eligible for voting, so
Hi Thilo,
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Thilo Borgmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > [...]
> >>
> >> The vote will end 1 week from now, simple 50% majority (Yes vs no)
> >> I dont really know who should be eligible for voting, so i suggest
> >> everyone from the vote comittee but iam
Hi,
> [...]
>>
>> The vote will end 1 week from now, simple 50% majority (Yes vs no)
>> I dont really know who should be eligible for voting, so i suggest
>> everyone from the vote comittee but iam happy with anything, just
>> stating somethng ...
>>
>
> I am in
On 5/29/2016 6:30 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On May 29, 2016 4:59 PM, "James Almer" wrote:
>>
>> On 5/29/2016 5:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>>>
On Sun, 29 May 2016, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi,
On May 29, 2016 4:59 PM, "James Almer" wrote:
>
> On 5/29/2016 5:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 29 May 2016, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>>
> >>> It was suggested in the IRC meetin
Hi,
On May 29, 2016 5:01 PM, "Marton Balint" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 29 May 2016, James Almer wrote:
>
>> On 5/29/2016 5:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>>>
On Sun, 29 May 2016, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2016, James Almer wrote:
On 5/29/2016 5:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2016, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
resolve if AVClass & AVO
On 5/29/2016 5:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 29 May 2016, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>>
>>> It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
>>> resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be a
Hi,
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 29 May 2016, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> Hi
>>
>> It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
>> resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
>> This question needs to be awnsere
Hi,
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Thilo Borgmann
wrote:
> Am 29.05.16 um 01:32 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
> > Hi
> >
> > It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> > resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
> > This question needs to be awns
Am 29.05.16 um 01:32 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
> Hi
>
> It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
> This question needs to be awnsered before the next release because
> the ABI would be broken if its add
On Sun, 29 May 2016, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
This question needs to be awnsered before the next release because
the ABI would be broken if its added afterw
Hi,
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
> This question needs to be awnsered before the next release because
> the ABI would be broken i
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> Hi
>
> It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
> This question needs to be awnsered before the next release because
> the ABI would be broken
On 29 May 2016 at 00:32, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> It was suggested in the IRC meeting today that i start a vote to
> resolve if AVClass & AVOption should be added to AVCodecParameters
> This question needs to be awnsered before the next release because
> the ABI would be broken if its
Clément Bœsch pkh.me> writes:
> I'm OK with adding an AVClass* on top of AVCodecParameters.
+1
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 01:32:54AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
[...]
> Please state clearly if you agree to add AVClass&AVOption to
> AVCodecParameters or if you disagree about adding it or if you dont
> care either way
I'm OK with adding an AVClass* on top of AVCodecParameters.
Regards,
-
31 matches
Mail list logo
