Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnuker <at> gmail.com> writes: > Anyone can go to fairs, mentor for GSoC, write on the MLs, etc. > Not everyone has the time.
This is true, I completely agree. I am not sure if I understand the relevance though: The list of people on the voters committee contains both people who have (a certain amount of) patches in FFmpeg but also people with no (or only a very small number of) commits. So I don't think this is related. > The committe was made to govern this project in case questions > (mainly technical) need to be resolved. Yes, probably. > And answering technical questions requires knowledge of the > codebase. Of course, this is why Thilo should be part of the committee. > The codebase changes over time. New features like codecpar were > added a bit more than a month ago. So someone who continuously > improves the codebase would also follow what happens in the > project and be qualified to make an answer. Yes. Note that I did mention Thilo fixed one of the codecpar regressions making him qualified under your conditions. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
