2018-08-23 15:58 GMT+02:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> 2018-08-23 15:35 GMT+02:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>> 2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
>>> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240
>>> video.
>>
>> On x86_64 I get an even better improvement, on x86_32
>> decoding ge
On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2018-08-23 16:00 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
>> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2018-08-23 15:35 GMT+02:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240
2018-08-23 16:00 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2018-08-23 15:35 GMT+02:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>>> 2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240
video.
>>>
>>> On x86_64 I get an even bet
On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2018-08-23 15:35 GMT+02:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>> 2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
>>> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240
>>> video.
>>
>> On x86_64 I get an even better improvement, on x86_32
>> decoding gets slower
2018-08-23 15:35 GMT+02:00, Carl Eugen Hoyos :
> 2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
>> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240
>> video.
>
> On x86_64 I get an even better improvement, on x86_32
> decoding gets slower by approximately 10%.
> Without the patch, de
Paul B Mahol wrote:
>Byte Order: Little Endian
I will check the mixed endian on my PDP-11 ;-)
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
2018-08-23 15:35 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
> On 8/23/18, James Almer wrote:
>> On 8/23/2018 10:24 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2018-08-23 15:21 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Ma
2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240 video.
On x86_64 I get an even better improvement, on x86_32
decoding gets slower by approximately 10%.
Without the patch, decoding is faster on x86_32 than
x86_64 here...
Testfile pro
On 8/23/18, James Almer wrote:
> On 8/23/2018 10:24 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2018-08-23 15:21 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
>> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x
2018-08-23 15:25 GMT+02:00, Nicolas George :
> Paul B Mahol (2018-08-23):
>> Ugh, can you explain why?
>
> Need provable claims.
What I meant was just that I would prefer to only test on other
platforms...
Not that it wouldn't make sense to add the tested platform
to the commit message though.
C
On 8/23/2018 10:24 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2018-08-23 15:21 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
>>> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240
> vi
Paul B Mahol (2018-08-23):
> Try it yourself
Your patch. Still not ok.
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On 8/23/18, Nicolas George wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (2018-08-23):
>> Ugh, can you explain why?
>
> Need provable claims.
Try it yourself, that is only way you will prove it to self.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/ma
Paul B Mahol (2018-08-23):
> Ugh, can you explain why?
Need provable claims.
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2018-08-23 15:21 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
>> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>> 2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240
video.
>>>
>>> On which hardware did you test?
>>
>>
2018-08-23 15:21 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
>>> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240
>>> video.
>>
>> On which hardware did you test?
>
> That is highly confidental info.
In that case
On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
>> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240 video.
>
> On which hardware did you test?
That is highly confidental info.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing
2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240 video.
On which hardware did you test?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/f
2018-04-03 13:38 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol :
> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
> ---
> libavcodec/utvideodec.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/utvideodec.c b/libavcodec/utvideodec.c
> index 82cb038ccd..99b37aa0f3 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/utvideodec.c
> +++ b/libavco
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 01:38:14PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol
> ---
> libavcodec/utvideodec.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/utvideodec.c b/libavcodec/utvideodec.c
> index 82cb038ccd..99b37aa0f3 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/utvideod
20 matches
Mail list logo
