2018-08-23 15:35 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: > On 8/23/18, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/2018 10:24 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> 2018-08-23 15:21 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: >>>>> On 8/23/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> 2018-08-23 15:08 GMT+02:00, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> From 100x real-time decoding to 138x real-time decoding for 320x240 >>>>>>> video. >>>>>> >>>>>> On which hardware did you test? >>>>> >>>>> That is highly confidental info. >>>> >>>> In that case this patch is not ok. >>> >>> Ugh, can you explain why? >> >> Christ, just say what CPU you used already. > > When you insist! > > Architecture: x86_64 > CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Sorry if you disagree but this is not a useful answer: The important question is (actually was, now that I confirmed what was claimed earlier) if you compiled for 32 or 64 bit. Yes, my original question wasn't much better: Sorry about it! Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
