subject:"Re\: \[FFmpeg\-devel\] \[PATCH 0\/8\] AVX\-512 support \(v.1\)"

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/8] AVX-512 support (v.1)

2017-10-30 Thread Martin Vignali

Hello, > > The second is the v210enc function, it passes checkasm but > > it is not any faster. It is there to show that all the previous > > commits work correctly, namely: configure checks, cpuid > > detection, x86inc changes, checkasm. > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/8] AVX-512 support (v.1)

2017-10-30 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos

2017-10-30 14:08 GMT+01:00 James Darnley : > There are 2 commits here that I don't intend to be applied (now). > The first is the alignment increase reported by avutil. Why is that bad? > The second is the v210enc function, it passes checkasm but > it is not any faster. It is there to show tha