2017-10-30 14:08 GMT+01:00 James Darnley <jdarn...@obe.tv>:

> There are 2 commits here that I don't intend to be applied (now).

> The first is the alignment increase reported by avutil.

Why is that bad?

> The second is the v210enc function, it passes checkasm but
> it is not any faster.  It is there to show that all the previous
> commits work correctly, namely: configure checks, cpuid
> detection, x86inc changes, checkasm.

Sound like very good reasons to actually commit.

Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to