On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:25:45 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 12/25/2017 2:53 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > diff --git a/libavresample/avresample.h b/libavresample/avresample.h
> > index 193443e2a6..57889c572c 100644
> > --- a/libavresample/avresample.h
> > +++ b/libavresample/avresample.h
> >
On 12/25/2017 2:53 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> diff --git a/libavresample/avresample.h b/libavresample/avresample.h
> index 193443e2a6..57889c572c 100644
> --- a/libavresample/avresample.h
> +++ b/libavresample/avresample.h
> @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@
>
> #define AVRESAMPLE_MAX_CHANNELS 32
>
On 12/25/2017 5:53 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility
> with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the FFmpeg project and duplicated
> functionality provided by libswresample.
>
> In order to improve consistency and reduce attack
On 26 December 2017 at 16:57, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 12/26/2017 4:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > You didn't even bother to read the patch? Your objections have been
> > addressed.
> > Since your new objection is invalid, I still intent to push it.
>
> I said wording, which others ha
On 12/26/2017 5:03 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Derek Buitenhuis (2017-12-26):
>> It would be nice if this community moved away from the "aggressive asshole"
>> style of development, as seen here, but after so many years, that just
>> seems impossible. Normal people get pushed away by aggressive ass
Derek Buitenhuis (2017-12-26):
> It would be nice if this community moved away from the "aggressive asshole"
> style of development, as seen here, but after so many years, that just
> seems impossible. Normal people get pushed away by aggressive assholes.
I agree on the idea. Maybe start by not ca
On 12/26/2017 4:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> You didn't even bother to read the patch? Your objections have been
> addressed.
> Since your new objection is invalid, I still intent to push it.
I said wording, which others had issues with, and were *not* addressed until
v2 of the patch yeste
On 12/26/2017 1:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 26 December 2017 at 16:35, Derek Buitenhuis
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/26/2017 4:10 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
>>> I missed that. If the proposal was similar enough to what was sent
>>> yesterday, then my objection does not stand, of course, sorry.
On 26 December 2017 at 16:35, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 12/26/2017 4:10 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> > I missed that. If the proposal was similar enough to what was sent
> > yesterday, then my objection does not stand, of course, sorry.
>
> The version on the ML then was different, and it never
On 12/26/2017 4:10 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> I missed that. If the proposal was similar enough to what was sent
> yesterday, then my objection does not stand, of course, sorry.
The version on the ML then was different, and it never reached consensus at
all on wording. I object for the reasons st
On 12/26/2017 3:54 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> This has been on the ML for over a month. No one disagreed then. No one was
> on vacation then.
I agree with Nicholas, sending a new, different version of a patch, *on
Christmas Day*,
and pushing on Boxing Day if nobody has objections, is not O
Rostislav Pehlivanov (2017-12-26):
> This has been on the ML for over a month. No one disagreed then. No one was
> on vacation then.
I missed that. If the proposal was similar enough to what was sent
yesterday, then my objection does not stand, of course, sorry.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
s
On 26 December 2017 at 15:47, Nicolas George wrote:
> Rostislav Pehlivanov (2017-12-26):
> > I'll push this tonight if there are no more objections.
>
> Way too soon. For a patch that sensitive, leaving a week for people to
> voice their concerns and raise objections that you may not have thought
Rostislav Pehlivanov (2017-12-26):
> I'll push this tonight if there are no more objections.
Way too soon. For a patch that sensitive, leaving a week for people to
voice their concerns and raise objections that you may not have thought
of seems like a reasonable minimum. Plus we are on vacation pe
On 25 December 2017 at 17:53, Rostislav Pehlivanov
wrote:
> Deprecate the entire library. Merged years ago to provide compatibility
> with Libav, it remained unmaintained by the FFmpeg project and duplicated
> functionality provided by libswresample.
>
> In order to improve consistency and reduce
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:57:31AM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
[...]
> > What you call "dead project" did basically all of the hardware
> > transcoding improvements that were merged into ffmpeg. How very
> > insincere of you.
> >
>
> Didn't mean dead as an offense, just as an honest fact. H
On 25 December 2017 at 11:03, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 10:44:40 +
> Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
>
> > On 25 December 2017 at 06:50, wm4 wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 02:12:38 +
> > > Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> > > > -
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 10:44:40 +
Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 25 December 2017 at 06:50, wm4 wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 02:12:38 +
> > Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> > > ---
> > > doc/APIchanges | 5 +
> > > liba
On 25 December 2017 at 06:50, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 02:12:38 +
> Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> > ---
> > doc/APIchanges | 5 +
> > libavresample/avresample.h | 30 +-
> > 2 files changed, 30 i
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 02:12:38 +
Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> ---
> doc/APIchanges | 5 +
> libavresample/avresample.h | 30 +-
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/APIchan
On 25.11.2017 18:31, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 11/25/2017 2:40 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
Maybe "libavresample is not maintained by the FFmpeg project and will be
dropped at the next major bump. Please use libswresample instead."
And it probably needs a longer explanation somewhere (website/news
On 11/25/2017 2:40 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> Maybe "libavresample is not maintained by the FFmpeg project and will be
> dropped at the next major bump. Please use libswresample instead."
>
> And it probably needs a longer explanation somewhere (website/news/...)
All API functions should be prope
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:58:16PM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/libavresample/utils.c b/libavresample/utils.c
> index b4fb906556..3e629fe901 100644
> --- a/libavresample/utils.c
> +++ b/libavresample/utils.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ int avresample_open(AVAudioResampleContext *
On 17 November 2017 at 17:53, James Almer wrote:
> On 11/17/2017 12:58 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> > ---
> > doc/APIchanges| 5 +
> > libavresample/utils.c | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/APIchanges
On 17 November 2017 at 17:51, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-11-17 16:58 GMT+01:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov :
>
> > +2017-xx-xx - xxx - lavr 4.0.0 - avresample.h
> > + Deprecate the entire library. It was unmaintained and redundant
> > + as libswresample did everything it did better, faster, wi
On 11/17/2017 12:58 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> ---
> doc/APIchanges| 5 +
> libavresample/utils.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges
> index d336f6ce22..22c7b5a0d0 100644
> --- a/do
2017-11-17 16:58 GMT+01:00 Rostislav Pehlivanov :
> +2017-xx-xx - xxx - lavr 4.0.0 - avresample.h
> + Deprecate the entire library. It was unmaintained and redundant
> + as libswresample did everything it did better, faster, with more
> + control and with a better, slightly higher level API
27 matches
Mail list logo
