On 12/26/2017 1:52 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On 26 December 2017 at 16:35, Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 12/26/2017 4:10 PM, Nicolas George wrote: >>> I missed that. If the proposal was similar enough to what was sent >>> yesterday, then my objection does not stand, of course, sorry. >> >> The version on the ML then was different, and it never reached consensus at >> all on wording. I object for the reasons stated in my other mail. >> >> - Derek >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> > > You didn't even bother to read the patch? Your objections have been > addressed. > Since your new objection is invalid, I still intent to push it. > > Either give a valid objection or I'm pushing tomorrow night.
Don't give ultimatums, please. There is no hurry to push this patch. It's not fixing any problem nor being the solution to something that's blocked because of it. You can wait a bit before pushing. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
