On 9/22/22 10:59, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Scott Theisen (2022-09-16 19:41:43)
Ping; it still applies cleanly.
Missing motivation for this change. Is it faster, or why is the new code
better?
To make it easier to read. `buf_end` is shorter than `frag->data +
frag->data_size`. Initiali
Quoting Scott Theisen (2022-09-16 19:41:43)
> Ping; it still applies cleanly.
Missing motivation for this change. Is it faster, or why is the new code
better?
--
Anton Khirnov
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mai
Ping; it still applies cleanly.
-Scott Theisen
On 5/15/22 14:50, Scott Theisen wrote:
Ping; it still applies cleanly.
-Scott Theisen
On 2/8/22 15:32, Scott Theisen wrote:
Also add a few clarifying comments.
---
libavcodec/cbs_mpeg2.c | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+),
Ping; it still applies cleanly.
-Scott Theisen
On 2/8/22 15:32, Scott Theisen wrote:
Also add a few clarifying comments.
---
libavcodec/cbs_mpeg2.c | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/cbs_mpeg2.c b/libavcodec/cbs_mpeg2.c
index 33bd3