On 9/22/22 10:59, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Scott Theisen (2022-09-16 19:41:43)
Ping; it still applies cleanly.
Missing motivation for this change. Is it faster, or why is the new code
better?


To make it easier to read.  `buf_end` is shorter than `frag->data + frag->data_size`.  Initialize `start` to `frag->data` so the calls to avpriv_find_start_code are the same.

I realize readability is an opinion, but I felt that saving the buffer end to a variable and tweaking the comments increased the readability of the code.

Regards,

Scott
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to