>
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael Niedermayer
> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 3:53 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] mov: support for mu
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:20:24PM +, Eran Kornblau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:28:16PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:51:00AM -0800, Sasi Inguva wrote:
> > > > patch looks good to me.
> > >
> > > applied
> >
> > maybe i asked already but it seems
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:28:16PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:51:00AM -0800, Sasi Inguva wrote:
> > > patch looks good to me.
> >
> > applied
>
> maybe i asked already but it seems the Author field of your commits is
> inconsistet in git
>
> some say:
> A
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:28:16PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:51:00AM -0800, Sasi Inguva wrote:
> > patch looks good to me.
>
> applied
maybe i asked already but it seems the Author field of your commits
is inconsistet in git
some say:
Author: erankor
some s
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:51:00AM -0800, Sasi Inguva wrote:
> patch looks good to me.
applied
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I know you won't believe me, but the highest form of Human Excellence is
to question oneself and others. -- Soc
> > > From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On
> Behalf Of Sasi Inguva
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:30 AM
> > > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
> > > >
; > > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:30 AM
> > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] mov: support for multiple edits and cenc
> > > decryption
> > >
> > > Can you add a fate test ? Rest looks
sions and patches
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] mov: support for multiple edits and cenc
> > decryption
> >
> > Can you add a fate test ? Rest looks fine to me.
> >
> Attached:
> 1. Fate test
> 2. The original patch
> 3. Sample file - needs to be uplo
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of Sasi
> Inguva
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:30 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] mov: support for multiple edits and
pkt->size);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -6248,7 +6334,7 @@ static int mov_seek_stream(AVFormatContext *s,
> AVStream *st, int64_t timestamp,
> sample = 0;
> if (sample < 0) /* not sure what to do */
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of Sasi
> Inguva
> Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 8:25 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] mov: support for multiple edits and
I agree . #4 makes the most sense.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Eran Kornblau
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We found today that this change:
> https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/ca6cae73db207f17a0d5507609de12
> 842d8f0ca3
> can break the decryption of MP4s encrypted with common encryption.
>
> I
Hi all,
We found today that this change:
https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/ca6cae73db207f17a0d5507609de12842d8f0ca3
can break the decryption of MP4s encrypted with common encryption.
I would like to submit a patch for that, but wanted to consult first about the
best approach.
The problem
13 matches
Mail list logo