On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:52:31AM +0100, bzk0...@aol.com wrote:
> The problem with 4:2:0 (which we are currently using
> for most content) is that it is still too heavy on the
> CPU load to make streaming of many videos in parallel
> completely smooth, which is our primary requirement.
>
> Simply
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:24:56 +0100
René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Friday November 14 2014 18:47:53 bzk0...@aol.com wrote:
>
> >We need Hap encoded videos to use them with a video compositing / VJing
> >software on MacOS, Modul8 (http://www.modul8.ch/). When using lots of
>
> Really, MacOS?
> (Mac
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:34:57 +0100
Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > Are you sure this compression format makes any sense whatsoever?
> > You get a 1:6 compression (exactly, compared to RGB888), but
> > also horrible compression artefacts.
> > Simply going to half the resolution in x and y with YUV420
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:59:45PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:43:25PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:37:47PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:19:26PM +0100, bzk0...@aol.com wrote:
> > > > Dear ffmpeg deve
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:43:25PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:37:47PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:19:26PM +0100, bzk0...@aol.com wrote:
> > > Dear ffmpeg developers,
> > >
> > > is there any (planned) support for the Hap video code
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:37:47PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:19:26PM +0100, bzk0...@aol.com wrote:
> > Dear ffmpeg developers,
> >
> > is there any (planned) support for the Hap video codec in ffmpeg?
> >
> > https://github.com/vidvox/hap
> >
> > The implementat
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:19:26PM +0100, bzk0...@aol.com wrote:
> Dear ffmpeg developers,
>
> is there any (planned) support for the Hap video codec in ffmpeg?
>
> https://github.com/vidvox/hap
>
> The implementation for Windows and Mac is available freely under a
> permissive license.
Where i
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:56:11 + (UTC)
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> aol.com> writes:
>
> > is there any (planned) support for the Hap
> > video codec in ffmpeg?
>
> Could you elaborate a little on the use-case?
> I am curious what hardware does not allow to
> playback the usual codecs but al
aol.com> writes:
> is there any (planned) support for the Hap
> video codec in ffmpeg?
Could you elaborate a little on the use-case?
I am curious what hardware does not allow to
playback the usual codecs but allows SSD
upgrades.
Carl Eugen
___
ff
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:19:26PM +0100, bzk0...@aol.com wrote:
> Dear ffmpeg developers,
>
> is there any (planned) support for the Hap video codec in ffmpeg?
i dont know of anyone working on it but that doesnt say much ...
do you want to work on implementing / porting it to FFmpeg ?
>
> ht
Dear ffmpeg developers,
is there any (planned) support for the Hap video codec in ffmpeg?
https://github.com/vidvox/hap
The implementation for Windows and Mac is available freely under a
permissive license.
If not, does anyone know of any other means of encoding with Hap under
Linux?
Thanks in
11 matches
Mail list logo
