On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:07:09 -0400
"Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:15 PM, wm4 wrote:
>
> > I hope FFmpeg doesn't value speed over clean code. (Oh who am I
> > kidding, the worst abuse is ok if it makes it 1% faster!)
>
>
> I think this is unfair. Your statement
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:15 PM, wm4 wrote:
> I hope FFmpeg doesn't value speed over clean code. (Oh who am I
> kidding, the worst abuse is ok if it makes it 1% faster!)
I think this is unfair. Your statements suggests:
- that the slowdown is a direct effect of making the code cleaner;
-
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:11:34 +0200
Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> On 3/22/15, wm4 wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:12:04 +0100
> > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> >> Hi anton, everyone else
> >
> > I appreciate that you contacted the author of these patches as well.
> >
> >> the "cosmetic" commits f
On 3/22/15, wm4 wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:12:04 +0100
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
>> Hi anton, everyone else
>
> I appreciate that you contacted the author of these patches as well.
>
>> the "cosmetic" commits from yesterday
>> (665e0c10a63d31dd6c7b1fba14db074625d54614..fa7c08d5e192aea77
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:12:04 +0100
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi anton, everyone else
I appreciate that you contacted the author of these patches as well.
> the "cosmetic" commits from yesterday
> (665e0c10a63d31dd6c7b1fba14db074625d54614..fa7c08d5e192aea77fdfb7f52c44c196a3ba4452)
> /
> (d8a
Hi anton, everyone else
the "cosmetic" commits from yesterday
(665e0c10a63d31dd6c7b1fba14db074625d54614..fa7c08d5e192aea77fdfb7f52c44c196a3ba4452)
/
(d8a45d2d49f54fde042b195f9d5859251252493d..c28ed1d743443e783537d279ae721be3bbdf7646)
cause a ~1% speed loss in the H.264 decoder which is probably
