On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:07:09 -0400 "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:15 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > I hope FFmpeg doesn't value speed over clean code. (Oh who am I > > kidding, the worst abuse is ok if it makes it 1% faster!) > > > I think this is unfair. Your statements suggests: > - that the slowdown is a direct effect of making the code cleaner; > - that any speedup to undo such slowdowns would automatically lead to ugly > code again. > > You have no evidence for either statement. Anton posted a double-digit > patchset, and although I'm sure the end result is cleaner (I have no > opinion), you'd need to figure out _which_ patch(es) made things slower and > _why_ (cosmetics? or unrelated?), before you can prove #1. All you have > right now is apples and pears. #2 is impossible to prove. Yeah, sorry for jumping to conclusions. And I suppose the correct way to call these commits is not "cosmetics" but "refactoring". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
