On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 04:41:49PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:03:01PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Anyways, the important thing here is to ensure t
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:03:01PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > Anyways, the important thing here is to ensure that
> > > code from other projects gets proper attribution.
> >
> > Then pl
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:03:01PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Anyways, the important thing here is to ensure that
> > code from other projects gets proper attribution.
>
> Then please send a patch that adds the attribution,
> remember that it is based
Aaron Boxer gmail.com> writes:
> Anyways, the important thing here is to ensure that
> code from other projects gets proper attribution.
Then please send a patch that adds the attribution,
remember that it is based on old libopenjpeg code,
Reimar already provided an appropriate line.
> I'm s
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Reimar Döffinger > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:50:06PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Ricardo Constantino
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 23 March 2016 at 22:35, Aaron Bo
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Reimar Döffinger <
> reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:50:06PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> >> > O
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:50:06PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Ricardo Constantino
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 23 March 2016 at 22:35, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > > > Back to my original point, what is the rea
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Michael Bradshaw
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Aaron Boxer
> wrote:
> > > > Hello Again,
> > > >
> > > > I took a look
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:35:20PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Michael Bradshaw wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > > Hello Again,
> > >
> > > I took a look at the FFmpeg j2k code. Now, I've worked with OpenJPEG for
> > > many ye
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
>
> Not having seen the specification I do have a question: Is it possible this
> code piece is in the spec? Many specs contain sample code or a description
> leading to very similar implementations.
>
> I think this is important to double
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Michael Bradshaw
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > > Hello Again,
> > >
> > > I took a look at the FFmpeg j2k code. Now, I've worked with OpenJPEG
> for
> > > many years
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:50:06PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Ricardo Constantino
> wrote:
>
> > On 23 March 2016 at 22:35, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > > Back to my original point, what is the reasoning not to just switch to
> > > OpenJPEG?
> > Both OpenJPEG 1 and 2
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:35:20PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Michael Bradshaw wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > > Hello Again,
> > >
> > > I took a look at the FFmpeg j2k code. Now, I've worked with OpenJPEG for
> > > many ye
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Ricardo Constantino
wrote:
> On 23 March 2016 at 22:35, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > Back to my original point, what is the reasoning not to just switch to
> > OpenJPEG?
> Both OpenJPEG 1 and 2 are supported to add as external libraries in
> FFmpeg. What do you mean by
On 23 March 2016 at 22:35, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> Back to my original point, what is the reasoning not to just switch to
> OpenJPEG?
Both OpenJPEG 1 and 2 are supported to add as external libraries in
FFmpeg. What do you mean by switching to OpenJPEG?
___
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Michael Bradshaw wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> > Hello Again,
> >
> > I took a look at the FFmpeg j2k code. Now, I've worked with OpenJPEG for
> > many years, and I would say at least 20% of the code in FFmpeg was either
> > dire
On 23 March 2016 at 21:22, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Reimar Döffinger gmx.de> writes:
>
> > If it is copied the authors will hopefully admit to it
> > (and hopefully be more careful about attribution in the
> > future).
>
> I of course agree with what you wrote but the original
> author of the j
Reimar Döffinger gmx.de> writes:
> If it is copied the authors will hopefully admit to it
> (and hopefully be more careful about attribution in the
> future).
I of course agree with what you wrote but the original
author of the jpeg 2000 codec was unreachable a few
weeks after he had submitt
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:24:47PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> Hello Again,
>
> I took a look at the FFmpeg j2k code. Now, I've worked with OpenJPEG for
> many years, and I would say at least 20% of the code in FFmpeg was either
> directly copied from OpenJPEG, or is very similar to OpenJPEG code.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> Hello Again,
>
> I took a look at the FFmpeg j2k code. Now, I've worked with OpenJPEG for
> many years, and I would say at least 20% of the code in FFmpeg was either
> directly copied from OpenJPEG, or is very similar to OpenJPEG code.
>
> I t
Hello Again,
I took a look at the FFmpeg j2k code. Now, I've worked with OpenJPEG for
many years, and I would say at least 20% of the code in FFmpeg was either
directly copied from OpenJPEG, or is very similar to OpenJPEG code.
I think the people who did the work on the FFmpeg codec would readily
21 matches
Mail list logo
