On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Ricardo Constantino <wiia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 March 2016 at 22:35, Aaron Boxer <boxe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Back to my original point, what is the reasoning not to just switch to > > OpenJPEG? > Both OpenJPEG 1 and 2 are supported to add as external libraries in > FFmpeg. What do you mean by switching to OpenJPEG? > I mean abandoning FFmpeg j2k codec, which seems to be a less-featureful copy of OpenJPEG, and putting resources into fixing OpenJPEG issues and making it better. Since OpenJPEG has a much broader user community, this would help both FFmpeg users and many others. I'm not going to post any more on this topic - it is getting a bit boring and seems to be raising some people's blood pressure. But, I think the code attribution issue needs to be dealt with by someone. Bye, Aaron > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
