On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 09:44:58PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Michael Niedermayer
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 8:40 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0 LTS vs 5.1 LTS
>
> On Mon, Apr 2
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > Do people prefer that 5.0 b
On 4/25/2022 2:19 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
Or something else ?
My understanding of the consensus wa
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
>> > Or something else ?
>>
>> My understandi
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
> > Or something else ?
>
> My understanding of the consensus was;
> - 5.0 in Dec/Jan
> - 5.1 in Jul with A
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
> Or something else ?
My understanding of the consensus was;
- 5.0 in Dec/Jan
- 5.1 in Jul with API additions, but no ABI/behavior breakage
- 6.0 in Dec 22 with ABI/API/behavior br
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Paul
> B Mahol
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 10:01 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0 LTS vs 5.1 LTS
>
> On Mon, Apr 25,
org>
> > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0 LTS vs 5.1 LTS
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
> > Or something else ?
>
> @Anton - I'm wondering how your multi-threading transformations
> to ffmpeg.c
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Michael Niedermayer
> Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2022 6:36 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0 LTS vs 5.1 LTS
>
> Hi all
>
> 2022年4月24日 00:36，Michael Niedermayer 写道：
>
> Hi all
>
> Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
> Or something else ?
I think 5.0 or 5.1 is ok.
Because LTS is just for stable, I am looking at maillist,
There have lots of patch will change lots of code every version,
So wha
On 2022-04-23 10:06 pm, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
Or something else ?
A LTS release should be prospectively designated.
That way, devs can prioritze their efforts and enterprise users can plan
a roadmap for deployment.
So,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:15 PM James Almer wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/23/2022 3:08 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:40 PM James Almer wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/23/2022 1:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
On 4/23/2022 3:08 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:40 PM James Almer wrote:
On 4/23/2022 1:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
Or something else ?
Thanks
5.0 lacks the new channel layout API, and making that
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:40 PM James Almer wrote:
>
> On 4/23/2022 1:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
> > Or something else ?
> >
> > Thanks
>
> 5.0 lacks the new channel layout API, and making that an LTS will give
>
On 4/23/2022 1:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
Or something else ?
Thanks
5.0 lacks the new channel layout API, and making that an LTS will give
projects less incentive to migrate, so IMO, 5.1 (or a newer one) should
be the
Hi all
Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
Or something else ?
Thanks
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Nations do behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives.
-- Abba Eban
signature.asc
Description: PGP signat
18 matches
Mail list logo
