On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 09:44:58PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > >> >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> >> > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ? > >> >> > Or something else ? > >> >> > >> >> My understanding of the consensus was; > >> >> - 5.0 in Dec/Jan > >> >> - 5.1 in Jul with API additions, but no ABI/behavior breakage > >> > > >> > yes > >> > >> OK. > >> > >> >> - 6.0 in Dec 22 with ABI/API/behavior breakage and while 5.1 becomes LTS > >> > > >> > we could give 5.1 an LTS "tag" when its released already > >> > >> I would mention it, tbh. > >> > >> > also thers the possibility that by december we have nothing that really > >> > benefits from a ABI/API/behavior breakage. > >> > If that happens people might prefer 5.2 over 6.0 i dont know. > >> > >> I think it would be clearer to accustom people that we have one big > >> potential change every year, at the same date. > > > > thats not a bad idea. Still bumping the sonames of the libs when there is > > no reason is not really nice. I dont know if we will have a reason in > > december > > A major number does not mean major soname bump if not needed. > This is release numbers.
indeed thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Elect your leaders based on what they did after the last election, not based on what they say before an election.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
