Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 2.8.6 and others

2016-02-01 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
On 30.01.2016 02:28, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:49:54AM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> On 27.01.2016 23:20, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> ill make new point releases soon >>> if you want something backported, backport it now >>> >>> also should i add the concat/sub

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 2.8.6 and others

2016-01-31 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:20:44PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > ill make new point releases soon > if you want something backported, backport it now > > also should i add the concat/subfile_enable switch and have them > disabled by default or is it preferred to leave them as is

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 2.8.6 and others

2016-01-29 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:49:54AM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > On 27.01.2016 23:20, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > ill make new point releases soon > > if you want something backported, backport it now > > > > also should i add the concat/subfile_enable switch and have them > > disabled by d

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 2.8.6 and others

2016-01-29 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
On 27.01.2016 23:20, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > ill make new point releases soon > if you want something backported, backport it now > > also should i add the concat/subfile_enable switch and have them > disabled by default or is it preferred to leave them as is? I'd rather have the protocol_wh

[FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 2.8.6 and others

2016-01-27 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi all ill make new point releases soon if you want something backported, backport it now also should i add the concat/subfile_enable switch and have them disabled by default or is it preferred to leave them as is? Thanks -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0F