On Wed, 3 May 2017, wm4 wrote:
>>> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6323
Rather tricky to fix, so I didn't. The problem is that the filter graph
remains unconfigured, so it can't know about unconnected outputs. It
remains unconfigured because the first input file is connected to two
filters (on
On Mon, 1 May 2017 15:29:22 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 5/1/2017 3:13 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, wm4 wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:14:15 +0200 (CEST)
> >> Marton Balint wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> > On Mon,
On Mon, 1 May 2017 15:29:22 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 5/1/2017 3:13 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, wm4 wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:14:15 +0200 (CEST)
> >> Marton Balint wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> > On Mon,
On 5/1/2017 3:13 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, wm4 wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:14:15 +0200 (CEST)
>> Marton Balint wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:23:16AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>>> >> We have recently b
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, wm4 wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:14:15 +0200 (CEST)
Marton Balint wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:23:16AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> We have recently been able to go through six hundred or so commits in a
>> month
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:33:29AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 4/24/2017 3:27 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:23:16AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> >> On 4/23/2017 11:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> Should changes ported from libav (what we
On 4/24/2017 3:27 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:23:16AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 4/23/2017 11:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges) be reviewed
>>> before being pushed?
>>
>> The lot of merges
i apologize in advance for replying to this email and not carls, but
be assured i am replying to both carl and wm4 here.
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:13:32 +0200, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:00:41 +0200
> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > 2017-04-24 15:38 GMT+02:00 wm4 :
> > > On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:14:15 +0200 (CEST)
Marton Balint wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:23:16AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>
> >> We have recently been able to go through six hundred or so commits in a
> >> month or two this way after bein
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:19:00 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 4/24/2017 4:08 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:27:45 +0200
> > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:23:16AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> >>> On 4/23/2017 11:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
On 4/24/2017 4:08 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:27:45 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:23:16AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>>> On 4/23/2017 11:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges)
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:23:16AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
We have recently been able to go through six hundred or so commits in a
month or two this way after being stuck for the longest time by a few of
those big API changes. If we start requ
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:27:45 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:23:16AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > On 4/23/2017 11:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges) be reviewed
> > > before being push
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:23:16AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 4/23/2017 11:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges) be reviewed
> > before being pushed?
>
> The lot of merges are simple things like "Fix this bug that was alrea
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:00:41 +0200
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-04-24 15:38 GMT+02:00 wm4 :
> > On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:23:20 +0200
> > Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >
> >> 2017-04-24 13:39 GMT+02:00 Ronald S. Bultje :
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:57 AM, wm4 wrote:
> >> >
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 20:50:38 -0700
Aaron Levinson wrote:
> properly review some of the ported changes on ffmpeg-devel. For
> example, I submitted a patch to fix a bug with QuickSync interlaced
> video to ffmpeg-devel on 4/13/2017. The change mostly reverted some of
> the QSV code in ffmpeg b
On 4/24/2017 12:50 AM, Aaron Levinson wrote:
> For example, I submitted a patch to fix a bug with QuickSync interlaced
> video to ffmpeg-devel on 4/13/2017. The change mostly reverted some of
> the QSV code in ffmpeg back to an earlier state. Interlaced video QSV
> encoding used to work in ffmpeg
On 4/23/2017 11:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges) be reviewed
> before being pushed?
The lot of merges are simple things like "Fix this bug that was already
fixed in ffmpeg months ago", "K&R", etc. Lately we are even no-oping a
g
2017-04-24 15:38 GMT+02:00 wm4 :
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:23:20 +0200
> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>> 2017-04-24 13:39 GMT+02:00 Ronald S. Bultje :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:57 AM, wm4 wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:46:38 +0200
>> >> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> >> > 20
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:23:20 +0200
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-04-24 13:39 GMT+02:00 Ronald S. Bultje :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:57 AM, wm4 wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:46:38 +0200
> >> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >> > 2017-04-24 5:50 GMT+02:00 Aaron Levinson :
2017-04-24 13:39 GMT+02:00 Ronald S. Bultje :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:57 AM, wm4 wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:46:38 +0200
>> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> > 2017-04-24 5:50 GMT+02:00 Aaron Levinson :
>> > > On 4/23/2017 7:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Should cha
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:57 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:46:38 +0200
> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > 2017-04-24 5:50 GMT+02:00 Aaron Levinson :
> > > On 4/23/2017 7:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges) be reviewed
>
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:46:38 +0200
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-04-24 5:50 GMT+02:00 Aaron Levinson :
> > On 4/23/2017 7:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>
> >> Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges) be reviewed
> >> before being pushed?
> >
> > I've asked about this on
2017-04-24 5:50 GMT+02:00 Aaron Levinson :
> On 4/23/2017 7:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>> Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges) be reviewed
>> before being pushed?
>
> I've asked about this on IRC (#ffmpeg-devel). The overall consensus there,
> at least at the time I ask
On 4/23/2017 7:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges) be reviewed
before being pushed?
I've asked about this on IRC (#ffmpeg-devel). The overall consensus
there, at least at the time I asked it, is there is an expectation that
such ch
Hi all
Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges) be reviewed
before being pushed?
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the
dead. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digit
26 matches
Mail list logo
