2017-04-24 13:39 GMT+02:00 Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:57 AM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:46:38 +0200 >> Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > 2017-04-24 5:50 GMT+02:00 Aaron Levinson <alevi...@aracnet.com>: >> > > On 4/23/2017 7:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Should changes ported from libav (what we call merges) be >> > >> reviewed before being pushed? >> > > >> > > I've asked about this on IRC (#ffmpeg-devel). The overall >> > > consensus there, at least at the time I asked it, is there is an >> > > expectation that such changes have already been properly >> > > reviewed for libav, so they are likely to be okay for ffmpeg, >> > > and while some issues have crept into ffmpeg as a result >> > > of these merges, the merge process has gone smoothly >> > > overall. >> > >> > This does not sound correct to me. >> >> Are you joking?
No, definitely not. > What he meant was: it depends who does the merges, or rather, > what political faction (s)he is part of. > > Tsk, tsk. (Apart from the Coc, I don't remember if you agreed or not:) Please try to comment on technical issues (or at least stay with the facts), the insults are less useful for this conversation. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
