On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>>
SDL_CreateMutex can fail:
https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_Cre
On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
SDL_CreateMutex can fail:
https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
This patch makes creation more robust in one instance.
Signed-off-by: Gane
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>> SDL_CreateMutex can fail:
>> https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
>> This patch makes creation more robust in one instance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> ---
>> ffplay.c
On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
SDL_CreateMutex can fail:
https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
This patch makes creation more robust in one instance.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
ffplay.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ffplay.c b/ffplay.c
SDL_CreateMutex can fail:
https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
This patch makes creation more robust in one instance.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
ffplay.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ffplay.c b/ffplay.c
index c5a7895..84bd6ee 100644
--- a/ffplay.c
+++