Le primidi 21 messidor, an CCXXIII, Marton Balint a écrit :
> I gave it a thought, and if we ensure that the decoding timestamp reaches
> outpoint instead of the presentation timestamp, can't we overcome the
> B-frame issue? It's a simple change and seems to do the right thing.
I am not sure if it
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Nicolas George wrote:
L'octidi 18 messidor, an CCXXIII, Marton Balint a écrit :
Yeah, i know. Actually I don't see how would it be possible to give a
stronger kind of guarantee efficiently and reliably to the user. That is why
I suppose this could be done by discarding th
L'octidi 18 messidor, an CCXXIII, Marton Balint a écrit :
> Yeah, i know. Actually I don't see how would it be possible to give a
> stronger kind of guarantee efficiently and reliably to the user. That is why
I suppose this could be done by discarding the packets beyond outpoint until
either all s
On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Nicolas George wrote:
L'octidi 18 messidor, an CCXXIII, Marton Balint a écrit :
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint
---
doc/demuxers.texi | 13 +
libavformat/concatdec.c | 22 --
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
L'octidi 18 messidor, an CCXXIII, Marton Balint a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Marton Balint
> ---
> doc/demuxers.texi | 13 +
> libavformat/concatdec.c | 22 --
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/demuxers.texi b/doc/demuxer
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint
---
doc/demuxers.texi | 13 +
libavformat/concatdec.c | 22 --
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/demuxers.texi b/doc/demuxers.texi
index 4bad1c8..4ba797e 100644
--- a/doc/demuxers.texi
+++ b/doc/d
