On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:34 AM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 02.08.2020 um 23:16 schrieb Jan Ekström :
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:29 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:47 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
> >>>
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:08 PM Carl Eugen
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 9:34 AM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 02.08.2020 um 23:16 schrieb Jan Ekström :
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:29 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:47 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
> >>>
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:08 PM Carl Eugen H
> Am 02.08.2020 um 23:16 schrieb Jan Ekström :
>
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:29 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>
>>> Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:47 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
>>>
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:08 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb Jan
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:29 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
> Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:47 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:08 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > >
> > > Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
> > >
> > > > Additionally, the spec only mentions
On 8/2/2020 11:22 AM, Jan Ekström wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:44 PM Jan Ekström wrote:
>>
At this point I would not like to attempt to figure out how to skip
channel coding units in the AAC decoder
>>>
>>> Just throw them away?
>>>
>>
>> Very easy to say in words, but I am not sure
Jan Ekström (12020-08-02):
> I think I've seen it mentioned recently when I've been discussing this
> patch set, so I have a feeling we might see a new version of that at
> some point. We already had multiple channels which were outside of
> WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE (such as LFE2), so a more defining A
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:44 PM Jan Ekström wrote:
>
> > > At this point I would not like to attempt to figure out how to skip
> > > channel coding units in the AAC decoder
> >
> > Just throw them away?
> >
>
> Very easy to say in words, but I am not sure how simple this is in the
> code. That said
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 2:46 PM Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> On 6/16/20, Jan Ekström wrote:
> > Requires some extraneous top side and bottom front channels to be
> > defined.
> >
> > According to STD-B59v2, the defined channel layout is:
> > - FL
> > - FR
> > - FC
> > - LFE1
> > - BL
> > - BR
> > - FLc
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:42 PM James Almer wrote:
>
> On 8/1/2020 9:17 AM, Jan Ekström wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:08 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >>
> >> Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
> >>
> >>> Additionally, the spec only mentions stereo/5.1 for direct mapping,
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:29 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
> Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:47 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:08 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > >
> > > Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
> > >
> > > > Additionally, the spec only mentions
On 8/1/2020 9:17 AM, Jan Ekström wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:08 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>
>> Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
>>
>>> Additionally, the spec only mentions stereo/5.1 for direct mapping, so
>>> I've kept to 5.1 since we have the capability for that on
Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:47 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
>
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:08 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >
> > Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
> >
> > > Additionally, the spec only mentions stereo/5.1 for direct mapping, so
> > > I've kept to 5.1 since we have t
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:08 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
> Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
>
> > Additionally, the spec only mentions stereo/5.1 for direct mapping, so
> > I've kept to 5.1 since we have the capability for that one.
>
> And you still believe it would be a di
Am Sa., 1. Aug. 2020 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
> Additionally, the spec only mentions stereo/5.1 for direct mapping, so
> I've kept to 5.1 since we have the capability for that one.
And you still believe it would be a disadvantage if the decoder outputs
this 5.1 mapping by default if not
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 2:51 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
> Am Di., 16. Juni 2020 um 23:11 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
> >
> > Requires some extraneous top side and bottom front channels to be
> > defined.
> >
> > According to STD-B59v2, the defined channel layout is:
> > - FL
> > - FR
> > - FC
> > -
Am Di., 16. Juni 2020 um 23:11 Uhr schrieb Jan Ekström :
>
> Requires some extraneous top side and bottom front channels to be
> defined.
>
> According to STD-B59v2, the defined channel layout is:
> - FL
> - FR
> - FC
> - LFE1
> - BL
> - BR
> - FLc
> - FRc
> - BC
> - LFE2
> - SiL
> - SiR
No way t
On 6/16/20, Jan Ekström wrote:
> Requires some extraneous top side and bottom front channels to be
> defined.
>
> According to STD-B59v2, the defined channel layout is:
> - FL
> - FR
> - FC
> - LFE1
> - BL
> - BR
> - FLc
> - FRc
> - BC
> - LFE2
> - SiL
> - SiR
> - TpFL
> - TpFR
> - TpFC
> - TpC
>
Requires some extraneous top side and bottom front channels to be
defined.
According to STD-B59v2, the defined channel layout is:
- FL
- FR
- FC
- LFE1
- BL
- BR
- FLc
- FRc
- BC
- LFE2
- SiL
- SiR
- TpFL
- TpFR
- TpFC
- TpC
- TpBL
- TpBR
- TpSiL
- TpSiR
- TpBC
- BtFC
- BtFL
- BtFR
---
doc/APIcha
Requires some extraneous top side and bottom front channels to be
defined.
According to STD-B59v2, the defined channel layout is:
- FL
- FR
- FC
- LFE1
- BL
- BR
- FLc
- FRc
- BC
- LFE2
- SiL
- SiR
- TpFL
- TpFR
- TpFC
- TpC
- TpBL
- TpBR
- TpSiL
- TpSiR
- TpBC
- BtFC
- BtFL
- BtFR
---
doc/APIcha
19 matches
Mail list logo
