Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] lavc/dsd_tablegen: speed up table generation

2015-12-30 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 08:56:48AM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> Tables are bit identical. >> Sample benchmark (Haswell, GNU/Linux+gcc): >> old: >> 814485 decicycles in dsd_ctables_tableinit, 512 runs, 0 skips >> >> new:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] lavc/dsd_tablegen: speed up table generation

2015-12-29 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 08:56:48AM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > Tables are bit identical. > Sample benchmark (Haswell, GNU/Linux+gcc): > old: > 814485 decicycles in dsd_ctables_tableinit, 512 runs, 0 skips > > new: > 356808 decicycles in dsd_ctable_tableinit, 512 runs, 0

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] lavc/dsd_tablegen: speed up table generation

2015-12-29 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
Tables are bit identical. Sample benchmark (Haswell, GNU/Linux+gcc): old: 814485 decicycles in dsd_ctables_tableinit, 512 runs, 0 skips new: 356808 decicycles in dsd_ctable_tableinit, 512 runs, 0 skips Binary size should essentially be identical, and is in fact identical on th