On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 08:56:48AM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> Tables are bit identical. >> Sample benchmark (Haswell, GNU/Linux+gcc): >> old: >> 814485 decicycles in dsd_ctables_tableinit, 512 runs, 0 skips >> >> new: >> 356808 decicycles in dsd_ctable_tableinit, 512 runs, 0 skips >> >> Binary size should essentially be identical, and is in fact identical on >> the configuration I tested on. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> >> --- >> libavcodec/dsd_tablegen.h | 19 ++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > probably ok
Seems like FATE does not test dsd, but I tested this offline. Pushed, thanks. > > [...] > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > Those who are best at talking, realize last or never when they are wrong. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
